NOTE: IF YOU POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE WITHOUT A SIGNATURE, YOUR POST WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.

Rick, I don't understand what your problem is. The reason for the redirect, as you said, "I have redirected Ourcolony to OurColony.net, as an attempt to evade the VfD. Delete both, not notable. RickK 03:09, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)"

This is simply not true.

It was not an attempt, and couldn't possibly ever be one, unless somehow Uvulabob27 built a time machine and went back to Apr 8th and created the page.

And what consensus? I see two people saying that it was an evasion tactic and one of them is you. When did two people create a consensus?

I understand you are on a "crusade" to keep wikipedia clean, but you need to learn that sometimes it's okay to sit back, look at the evidence and think that maybe the assumption you made was incorrect.

There is no reason why the two pages cannot be merged. And since Ourcolony is older, why not let it stand, allow the decission to delete OurColony.net come to a solution, and then decide what the best course of action is.

Jonamerica

Rick, I'd be happier to have a VfD on both pages than to have the redirect. The redirect makes no sense whatsoever. The two pages should be merged into one and this matter will go away.

Jonamerica 16:20, Thursday, June 20, 2024 (UTC) 16:20

You can't see his face, because its' covered in pie. What is the gamma correction of your monitor set to? t3hX

I understand your reservations about Ourcolony, but the reasons you gave for redirecting Ourcolony to OurColony.net seem mistaken. I don't want to start an edit war over this, so can I ask you to restore Ourcolony and put it up on VfD separately if you feel strongly about it? Rl 09:27, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi there! About this RfC... you are presently the only one endorsing InShaneee's summary. However, I must point out that the 'evidence' he used about a conflict between Kappa and myself was posted without my knowledge, and is in fact incorrect. Would you please visit the RfC page and consider if these added facts are grounds for revising your position? Yours, Radiant_* 11:03, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)