NOTE: IF YOU ARE ANONYMOUS, AND POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE, YOU WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.'

Thanks for replying re: IP blocking, I understand your predicament! --PopUpPirate 23:32, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Either the original index will be restored, or I will simply add a totally brand new index since Wikipedia policy, guidelines, and style guides state point blank that Lists are NOT redundant because of your stupid categories, that are just plain, wrong, incomplete, confusing, and next to impossible to use. Wikipedia, by current vfd on the Buddha Index is total farce.

I also have a private dictionary on alternative medicine on my website which happens to very be public. Wikipedia just likes to trash alternative medicine which happens to be used by half the planet while writing tons of trash articles like tampons. You people without a life don't even realize that dozens and dozens of web sites are selling advertisement on mirror copies of Wikipedia.

STOP trashing the perfectly valid topic of alternative medicine.

I want this index restored. -- John Gohde 06:53, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

PS: Even though the INDEX has been page protected the view source option was nice enough to actually give me the entire source in wiki format. Now, I wont have to write a program to convert the data. This data will make a good start on a lot bigger index of medicial topics. Just thought that you should know this so that all you little people can go on wasting more of your life making redirects and doing other stupid adminstrative stuff, while the bigger picture of destroying the project on alternative medicine goes on unchallenged, so that other business people can get rich off all the slaves at Wikipedia. -- John Gohde 07:49, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This popped up on my Watchlist and I experienced the nasal equivalent of a coffee enema. Please arrange to annotate your edit summaries to make it quite clear that you are quoting or naming something rather than being uncharacteristically abusive to someone (no matter how much they might deserve it…). Cheers wipingly, HAND --Phil | Talk 11:52, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, sorry i am kind of new to Wikipedia - anyways, you have deleted my Michael Dudikoff page because you said image was copyrighted?; info was actually written by me from several sources and image is not off the page you provided --Tigry 03:11, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps you could tell me to what you are referring?Dan w 07:21, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps you could try editing instead of simply deleting?Dan w 07:32, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I am fairly new to wiki, yet I understand that fair use may apply to my quoting directly from source to explain one of thier own publications. Please review the above fair use article before removing others contributions.Dan w 07:56, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Did you review the article on fair use? The size has little to do with it. I am quoting the source to expalin a book the source wrote. From the horse's mouth? Dan w 08:04, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cant we just track his ip and ban it, dosent deserve a human conotation, via that? --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:42, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Humm that sucks, well maybe we should ask one? --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:49, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

isp's yeah, uless its like a dos attackm they could care less. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:55, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Stalking"'s a strong and negatively charged word, but you are on my watchlist of users whose edits I like to check, if that's what you mean. The Recycling Troll 09:32, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

John Gohde has made no secret of the fact that he is MNH. He had a ban from the arbcom. The ban ended, and he came back. So he is now a user in good standing. Snowspinner 14:45, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)