Cannabis Ruderalis

TomSawyer (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TomSawyer (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:09, 1 March 2005

I suck your Cock!'


Thanks for replying re: IP blocking, I understand your predicament! --PopUpPirate 23:32, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

The index was deleted for bogus reasons.

Either the original index will be restored, or I will simply add a totally brand new index since Wikipedia policy, guidelines, and style guides state point blank that Lists are NOT redundant because of your stupid categories, that are just plain, wrong, incomplete, confusing, and next to impossible to use. Wikipedia, by current vfd on the Buddha Index is total farce.

I also have a private dictionary on alternative medicine on my website which happens to very be public. Wikipedia just likes to trash alternative medicine which happens to be used by half the planet while writing tons of trash articles like tampons. You people without a life don't even realize that dozens and dozens of web sites are selling advertisement on mirror copies of Wikipedia.

STOP trashing the perfectly valid topic of alternative medicine.

I want this index restored. -- John Gohde 06:53, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

PS: Even though the INDEX has been page protected the view source option was nice enough to actually give me the entire source in wiki format. Now, I wont have to write a program to convert the data. This data will make a good start on a lot bigger index of medicial topics. Just thought that you should know this so that all you little people can go on wasting more of your life making redirects and doing other stupid adminstrative stuff, while the bigger picture of destroying the project on alternative medicine goes on unchallenged, so that other business people can get rich off all the slaves at Wikipedia. -- John Gohde 07:49, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You owe me a fresh keyboard and a nice hot cup of coffee

This popped up on my Watchlist and I experienced the nasal equivalent of a coffee enema. Please arrange to annotate your edit summaries to make it quite clear that you are quoting or naming something rather than being uncharacteristically abusive to someone (no matter how much they might deserve it…). Cheers wipingly, HAND --Phil | Talk 11:52, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

You just keep digging yourself deeper and deeper..

You don't even have the courage to argue your case? You are banning innocent users for your powertrip. Please justify it or stop banning people. Trampled 23:33, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Leave a Reply