Just an FYI, the directions for multiple users on one account direct people to SPI. If they're supposed to go somewhere else, the directions are far from clear. Might be something to raise with the other SPI folks. Thanks! Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you have blocked that bot. But I have no intention to run it here before I get an approval. This is my first bot and those contributions are my first bot contributions. So if you can please unblock that. I am not going to run that here. You saw that it's last contribution is at 24 July. So if you kindly... --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 13:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked. Please do not edit outside your userspace (or the bot's) without getting approval from the bot approvals group. Also note that welcoming bots have repeatedly been rejected by the community. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many many thanks to you. Also thanks for the information about welcoming bot's.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 15:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our July backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the August blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See here. They seem to be quite young, so it seems pretty important to revdelete it. I'd contact someone via email or IRC, but I don't have an email address set, and I'm not sure how to use IRC, and, based on your contribs page, you seem active at the moment. --SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 21:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) If you mean their real name, revdelete wouldn't work because it's in every revision. The whole page would need deleted. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They seem online at the moment, and I've asked them to remove it from their current user page, which might make it possible to delete it without deleting every revision. --SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 21:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it myself. --SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 21:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it rises to the level of needing revision deletion. The user has nowhere posted his/her age or any other identifying information. If you do find such issues, you should request oversight privately rather than post on my talkpage, which is somewhat widely watched. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Reaper Eternal. Just so you know, FiveSidedFistagon has returned again, this time as Flatus I (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) ([1], [2]). Isn't it time to give him a block? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, Floquenbeam's got it. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:37, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And now he's come back as Flatus II (talk · contribs), Flatus III (talk · contribs), Flatus IV (talk · contribs), Flatus V (talk · contribs), Flatus VI (talk · contribs) (all blocked by Elockid (talk · contribs)), Flatus VII (talk · contribs), Flatus VIII (talk · contribs), Flatus IX (talk · contribs), and Flatus X (talk · contribs) (blocked by myself). Sigh. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, I have started a ban proposal on this individual at AN. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think that will stop him? WP:RBI. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:RBI is best, but if he is community banned, his edits can be reverted on sight. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]