Sorry to bother you just before the weekend, but I have a feeling that User talk:Yemote is probably User talk:Burnham (limited to the same articles, have similar obsessions, and edit styles) who you dealt with previously as a sockpuppet. Thanks, Rsloch (talk) 18:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Burnham is not blocked and doesn't appear to be a sockpuppet. Are these the right users? Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how I messed that up. OK let's try it this way. I may be wrong but the similarities between the two warrant a quick check using your Wiki superpowersRsloch (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked Yemote (talk · contribs) as a sockpuppet of Serafin (talk · contribs). Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now using this IP. Rather persistent this one. Rsloch (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- I should of course have invited you to comment here. There's just a bit of reading and threads on the talk page to get up to speed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but he's a nice guy, though not by our standards I suppose. For the record, that IP was me, from out in the sticks. Drmies (talk) 22:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you claiming the IP I blocked was you, or the other one? I'm pretty certain the IP I blocked was Badmachine (talk · contribs) editing while logged out. If you're claiming that was you, I'm highly disappointed that you would log out to post abusive commentary about Ironholds. Whatever, Drmies. :-( Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe he means he was the gentleman talking to Badmachine. Personally I find someone loses the right to be referred to as a "nice guy" when they spend months stalking and harassing a large chunk of my social circle, but that's just me. Ironholds (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was Badmachine alright. I guess he doesn't like you very much, Ironholds, but what you just told me is news to me. I just knew about his joy of watching penises and the kerfuffle over his user page, which was deemed too autobiographical. Badmachine has a past and a beating heart, like most of us. No, Reaper, I wasn't posting abusive commentary--you should know me better than that. Ironholds, I have no personal connection to Badmachine or contact information (I don't believe in that weird email address), but I'm going to try and ask him to consider not bothering you anymore. For now all I can do is apologize on his behalf. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK! That makes me feel better. When you commented on "that IP", I assumed you were on my talk page because the IP block had affected your account. Good luck with convincing Badmachine to not harass editors—see encyclopediadramatica.se/Special:Contributions/Hipcrime. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you obviously have confused the words "harass" with "expose". 184.8.114.208 (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reaper, I don't like any kind of harassment. I'm getting a little bit of it myself these days via email. I am in no position to judge where the borderline between "harass" and "expose" lies, but I did tell Badmachine (surprise, found his email address in a message from one or two years ago) where I stand: in a nutshell, personal stuff is off the table. (And IRC, from what I know of it) is just an invitation to letting loose without proper restraint: whoever fits that shoe can put it on.) He's not a monster, as far as I'm concerned. No one here is a monster, as far as I'm concerned. People have done things they maybe shouldn't have, sure. I am probably one of those, I'll be the first to acknowledge. Thanks, and take it easy, Drmies (talk) 18:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. While eliminating some vandalism from two user names Nutash Hira and Nutash loves Hira I stumbled on the user you have previously banned for abusing multiple accounts. I thought I'd bring these two to your attention. Capitalismojo (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, I blocked those two too. Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:04, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that an editor has been placing exactly the same or very similar text on multiple articles. I've suggested to that editor that they should seek a consensus before doing so. The editor is continuing along as before. Any thoughts about how to handle that? Are there better things for a Saturday afternoon?Rsloch (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC) I suspect this sentence is about me. I am simply adding info about Holocaust to sections covering Second World War(for example in Silesia article in history overview). User Rsloch seems to be interested in removing information about Nazi atrocities and claimed there was no Nazi genocide in Silesia(which goes against any mainstream history). --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted Mohammad Dawood (Bagram detainee) as an uncontested {{prod}}. I request userification please.

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 23:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]