Template:Abandon hope

• November 2, 2005 - December 28, 2005 User talk:Phroziac/Archive5
• September 29, 2005 - November 2, 2005 User talk:Phroziac/Archive4
• September 17, 2005 - September 29, 2005 User talk:Phroziac/Archive3
• August 17, 2005 - September 17, 2005 User talk:Phroziac/Archive2
• The beginning - August 17, 2005 User talk:Phroziac/Archive1

Thanks for updating Template:NoMultiLicense. Unfortunately, what you have put is an earlier, rejected proposal of mine. As you can see at Template_talk:NoMultiLicense, the (supposedly) better version is:

I am content with licensing my contributions only under the [[GNU Free Documentation License|GFDL]]. I believe that introducing other incompatible licenses complicates the legal situation of Wikipedia, so I choose not to do it.

Therefore I ask you to update with the text given here. BTW Maybe there should be a comma between "other" and "incompatible", I dunno, haven't got across to punctuation in my English classes :( . Or maybe you just happen to like the old version better? Sorry for the wasted time... and please answer here. --logixoul 22:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Sorry. Fixed now. :D I don't think there should be a comma there. --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 22:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--logixoul 22:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Phroziac, You appear to be promoting advocacy in Arbcomm. I'd ask you then to consider participating as an advocate in the Price Anderson case. We (Zen and I) want to protect the right to include unpopular facts (Being well-sourced) about the documented risks of nuclear power and the plan to hold taxpayers accountable for safety violations by the industry. Your fellow immoralist Katefan0 and Co. having failed to convince two mediators on the merits have initiated an Arbcom (citing several contents disputes as foundation). I'd like to provide an adequate defense without getting pulled in to an entertaining if unproductive fishing expedition. - it occurred to me that the ADA program might spare the Arbcom an unnecessary mud-wrestle. Best, Benjamin Gatti 04:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't post anymore of your anti-Semitic crap on my talk page Battlefield 10:14, 30 December 2005 (UTC) (User is responding to my {{test}} waring)[reply]

This user is giving me a somewhat hard time with comments such as the one above. User has already made a few rather disruptive edits ([1], [2], [3]) and seems to be a newbie hence I ask for you could explain him as he wont listen to me. I also like a temporary protection on Category:Anti-Semitic people during the vote. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 14:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Essjay has already taken care of this. User seems disruptive and uncivil. :/ --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 15:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

♥ CHOKORETTO? --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

mmmmm --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 16:14, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby award you these wings as they represent your character best, glad you are still with us. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Kawaii. :) --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 16:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby second this, and hope that I can work with from you now on in the future. Feel free to visit my talkpage, I am almost always online and I try to respond promptly. :) -MegamanZero|Talk 15:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wish you and your family a prosperous and happy New Year 2006! We shall surely remain actively involved in the Project Wikipedia. --Bhadani 16:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 22:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm involved in a what you could call a copyvio revert war. The user that kept removing the tag has finally registered and added a reason why he thinks it's not a copyvio. I'm still not convinced this is the case and would like some advice on how to proceed. For now I've posted a reply and both the article's and the user's talk page, but did not re-add the copyvio tag. Hirudo 21:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Pandit Bhajan Sopori Hirudo 22:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance Hirudo 23:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For last year's words belong to last year's language

And next year's words await another voice.

And to make an end is to make a beginning.

T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"

Happy New Year! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Phroziac, I wish to offer my gratitude for supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with the final tally of 65/4/3. If you would ever desire my assistance in anything, or wish to give me feedback on any actions I take, feel free to let me know. Cheers! Elle vécut heureusement toujours dorénavant (Be eudaimonic!) 08:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, girl! Thanks again for all the support at the R/C wiki. See you there! Best, Lucky 6.9 01:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Diggin' the new signature! I need to fancy mine up a bit. - Lucky 6.9 04:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like a advocate in resolving a dispite with Kelly_Martin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), regarding Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kelly Martin and taking further action if needbe. If you are prepared to help me form a case, please let me know! Thanks! Ian¹³_ID:540053 10:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The toolserver MySQL database is lagging by 29617 seconds, and you've had a query running for 2 days 12 hours 25 minutes 29 seconds. It kinda looks like you might have a script running a broken query. Please look into it for us. :) --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 19:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry... --AllyUnion (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious though, what were you doing that was taking so long? :) --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 01:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was attempting an inner join with pagelinks, which apparently is a bad idea. The results through pagelinks is too much. It apparently doesn't take much to query the database to generate a table of redirects only, but it takes forever to get references for a redirect page in pagelinks... --AllyUnion (talk) 01:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Phrozaic. I saw this WikiProject and can't quite figure it out. Is it just anyone who wants to write an encyclopedia? If so, isn't this almost everyone? If you could respond at my talk page, I would appreciate it. Thanks. --Think Fast 22:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. --Think Fast 22:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay -- its not encyclopaedic, but it sure gave me a chuckle. Thanks. -- Shinmawa 02:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you move an article that's on afd, could you please create a redirect from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewTitle to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OldTitle instead of moving the afd discussion? My bot can account for redirected afd discussions automatically, but it can't detect moved ones, and there isn't really an easy way to make it do so. —Cryptic (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phroziac, sorry to bomb your page, but I don`t know how to send a message. Just wanted to thank you for asking nicely and let you know I will quit with the vandalizm (I hit condi rice`s page). Condi certainly deserves it, but you`re right, that`s not what wiki is about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.178.146.249 (talk • contribs) 10:53, January 8, 2006 (UTC)

I'm happy for them to vote the way they want to vote. It's good to see where they stand. Everyking 04:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, hi there. Apparently, i'm not allowed to vote for arbCom because i'm not an admin.. In which case.. why the heck does the message appear for all users and not just admins? and/or why doesn't it say that at the top of the page? (Cyrius said i've not got suffrage) Wierd. Anyway, good luck!

Mr Spum 09:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping cool down, but sadly enough, I'm afraid I don't think it would actually help reach an eventual resolution. On the other hand, I'm curious to know if sysops are granted discretionary power to block certain users without going through all those procedures. — Instantnood 22:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]