Hello, Okmrman, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! QuicoleJR (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am just here to let you know that you archived 2 topics on the talk page Talk:Karl Jacobs that should not have been archived, they were important because they gave reasoning for some decisions regarding the article and comments within the article mention to check the talk page for further information (mainly about his place of birth). I have un-archived them so they are back on the main page but I also wanted to ask you to not archive everything, especially since the talk page is relatively small and didn't need archiving. I would recommend reading the help page Help:Archiving a talk page for more information on when to archive, and it suggests archiving after a page exceeds 75.000 bytes (Talk:Karl Jacobs hadn't exceeded 8.000 bytes). All the best! WanderingMorpheme 21:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop messing with talk page archiving? You've disrupted dozens of talk pages with unnecessary auto-archiving configurations that were done wrong and not necessary. Automatic archiving should not be configured just because a talk page has old topics. It is for talk page that are under regular discussion that need archiving to keep size down. This is disruptive. Stop. -- ferret (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Okmrman,

You have only been editing for a few weeks and I don't think you have enough editing experience to know when redirects or articles warrant deletion. Please stop nominating pages for deletion consideration until you have more experience on the project. I don't think you know what you are doing or are familar with BEFORE. If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I contest your non-admin closure of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Holy Chao. To me, three opinions are not WP:SNOW. I request that the RfD be open for at least a week, and that another user have a look at it after that.

Therefore, I request that you undo your non-admin closure as soon as possible. Thanks in advance.

Thanks in advance. Veverve (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure i will let u revert it Okmrman (talk) 16:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am also looking at the other closures at only four days. I think all these should be reopened. And, truthfully, you should be the one to reopen them, otherwise it could look like edit warring or close to it. Please do so. Thanks. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]