Have edited on Wikipedia with a previous account (or IP edits)? Wikipedia allows alternate accounts but has rules for how one should use an alternate account [1]. Springee (talk) 12:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is my first and only account on Wikipedia. Are you asking this because of our disagreement on Owens? Interesting. NikolaosFanaris (talk) 12:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have once again violated the edit limits on the Candance Owens article. Self revert or I will take this to 3RRN. Springee (talk) 13:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I perceive your edits as clear vandalism. Cited content was removed for no reason and without consensus. If you disagree with Ukraine or words against LGBT, bring it up in the discussion page. NikolaosFanaris (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've acknowledged receipt of the DS notifications related to BLP's so you KNOW this isn't true. But feel free to read WP:VANDNOT if you want a more full explanation of how obviously you are incorrect. You've been here for months; the "I'm new" excuse isn't going to shield you if you are trying to enforce your preferred version of contentious content on a BLP. The default is 100% to exclude this until there is crystal clear consensus to include (which you obviously do not have). VQuakr (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The DS notice says nothing about the definition of Vandalism. Please review the notice before citing it. SPECIFICO talk 13:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of 3RRN discussion: [2]

Hi there. I noticed you may be having some disagreements with other editors and I would like to take a moment to let you know that it's OK to regularly take a step back, especially when certain things do not seem to make sense. I say this because when I was starting out on wiki I also had editors that I disagreed with, but I also met some that were kind, patient and very giving with their time. Even though I did not always agree with them, they are a big part of why I still edit to this day. One thing they imparted upon me is that on political articles it is essential to consistently maintain WP:AGF, especially considering we are interacting via the written word. Luckily, most of the time we can go back and rectify or reconcile things after the fact, and though that never changes the past, it can help guide us to a better path moving forward. There are editors that have been doing this for a very long time, but not many that can stomach politically oriented topics because of it's ability to eat away at our faith. Maybe this is helpful, maybe not. I usually do not have any answers, but I'm always happy to talk about the questions. Cheers. DN (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DN. Much appreciated x NikolaosFanaris (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Just wanted to offer some support. These things happen a lot on high profile articles, as well as, to some of the best of us. Do try to enjoy your time away and try to come back with a fresh (hopefully somewhat positive) perspective. I tend to believe that you meant well and I'm not entirely clear as to how this all happened so quickly, but the point is always to learn from it and move in new directions. Don't let it get you down, these things usually take a lot of time and A LOT of RS. Cheers. DN (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back after a few days of rest. A lot of vandals are trying to insult others. Just take a deep breath and ignore them. You are really welcomed PAVLOV (talk) 10:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you PAVLOV! Breaks certainly help :) NikolaosFanaris (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greeks for the Fatherland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for this but I was left with no choice despite my efforts to de-escalate the situation, by a) explaining and b) warning you several times that such behavior is against the rules.

Please kindly remove each and every personal attack against me here. This includes but, is not limited to, accusations about being 'affiliated with the party', 'trying to mislead', 'lying' and anything else that is damaging to my reputation and is not based on evidence.

Please read Wikipedia:No personal attacks and in particular: "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Also you may want to check 'Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence.'

In the absence of any action, further measures will be taken.