Notice: American Politics - DS Alert. (TW) Tag: contentious topics alert |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
: Thanks, [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]], its still a work in progress. The DYK process is a bit daunting, but if I can think of a good blurb from the article, I'll give it a shot. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 06:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC) |
: Thanks, [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]], its still a work in progress. The DYK process is a bit daunting, but if I can think of a good blurb from the article, I'll give it a shot. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 06:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
== May 2018 == |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 22:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:39, 21 May 2018
| Some thoughts: | |
|---|---|
"To avoid unkind criticism: say nothing, be nothing, do nothing."
|
"There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy." |
A goat for you!
Welcome to the retirement home.
7&6=thirteen (☎) 23:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
First Ladies - Article for Deletion
Hey Netoholic,
I was hoping you might chime in on this discussion being had in regards to deleting a page for the upcoming Netflix film First Ladies. I created a draft earlier today due to the fact that there is no word that the film has actually begun filming. Noticed later in the day that someone had went ahead and created a article in the mainspace. Hope to get your input in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Ladies (film). Thanks, BoogerD (talk) 01:25, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Heya BoogerD. I'm going to sit out that one, since I think you know which direction I'd go on it and I don't want to run afoul of WP:Canvassing. You might want to give that a read. It gives some good advice on how to neutrally gather attention to discussions like that, such as avoiding posts to individual users (especially those that you suspect will go along with you) in favor of simple, neutral posts to WikiProject pages. I think it'll go you want anyway. Take care. -- Netoholic @ 04:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Netoholic, and thank you for your contributions! I noticed your article Passing on the Right and I think it’s a good candidate for Did You Know. DYK is the easiest and funnest way to get your creation on to the Main Page and in front of the eyeballs of 17 million people. Learn all about it here "DYK for Newbies." I'd like to take this opportunity to invite you to join other people who enjoy editing conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where you can can meet new colleagues and get answers to burning questions. I hope to see you there! – Lionel(talk) 06:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Lionelt, its still a work in progress. The DYK process is a bit daunting, but if I can think of a good blurb from the article, I'll give it a shot. -- Netoholic @ 06:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 - MrX 🖋 22:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)