Netmonger (I prefer to respond only on this talk page for discussions you open here; Kindly check back for replies)
Click here to leave me a message Send me a personal email Refresh this page Go to my main userpage
Archives Archive 1

Additional information RaveenS 17:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice work, if you need any help on this please let me know ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 11:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I have listed a lot information about her in external links. I want to add information about her biography, her family, the normality of her life in the midst of war, the taking of the jaffna peninsula, the chemmani mass graves investigation becuse of her death. Her family massacre, the people who took her cause including Sinhalese and the response of the government which a model of a responsible behaviour by a responsible government. I really want to bring all aspects of the case. In effect move from being about KK but about the case itself, what it represents to SL to as a model that is needed so badly now.RaveenS 17:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The content of the RfC is now in your userspace at User:Netmonger/RfC.

I don't believe in process for process sake, but I'd caution against simply reopening the existing case in case people who do believe in process accuse you of breaking that process (unless you can handle that!). I'd also caution against moving people's signature if they have signed in the wrong place (you should get them to do it themselves) and, if you ask them to move their signature, ensure you explain why so they know what they're doing and you can't be accused of "campaigning".

All of this is just advice, so please take it as such and ignore/adopt/improve as you see fit!

To relist the RfC, move it back to the old address but ensure that you or someone else tells everyone involved it has opened there.

Hope this helps. 〈REDVEЯS〉 12:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks sir, I have decided not to re-list the case, though the editor has again violated, WP:SPAM, WP:AGF and WP:STALK. If at all I were to re-list it, I would do it after consulting the other editors, who endorsed my statement and certified it. Thanks for your help. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 20:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi I saw the rating for Colombo. Personally I have to agree that some work is needed on it. Do you want to start working together to improve it and then have it rated again?
I've got some great pictures that we could incorporate. Also, stuff like the intro need to be re-written completely to improve it per WP:Mos. What do you think? --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 18:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Great, I agree with you, the article needs lot of reference comparing with other city articles, the problem is we dont have many books written about Colombo, the section and the length of the article meets the requirements of Manual of style, but there are issues with capitalization of the titles/subtitles. The grammar also needs to be improved and some statements are POV without reference and with some NPOV is questionable, Do u think we need any more pictures than we already have? It will be great if I can have few people working with me on the article, this article I believe can easily make it to the Featured article status, and could be the first Sri Lankan related article to be featured. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 05:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry it took so long to reply, but I was expecting you to reply on my talk page. I didn't see the note on the top of this page. My mistake.

I have midterms these days so I'm kind of busy, but about the pictures, I think we should include some pictures of the skyline in the infobox. And maybe we should vary the sizes and positions of the ones already there to improve the aesthetics instead of just having them along the right side. What do you think?

Yeah i agree the grammar is quite poor in some places and we need to fix that. And also need to try and make the text a little more professional.

Also i was wondering whether you knew the exact population of Colombo City. It says Colombo MC pop is 642,163, here and 377,396 here. I'm sure I'm missing something, but do you know what exactly it is? --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 18:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Dundee is a good example about the pics. They're all relevant to the adjoining section they're in and are nicely formatted. --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 18:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm repeatedly bugging your talk page aren't I? :)

Just made some changes to the History sections. Got most of the stuff from the references that were already there. I'm pretty sure I must be making a bunch of errors so please go ahead and make any corrections if you can.

About the images I guess it may be best to first get done writing the article and then worry about them and formatting and stuff. What do you think? --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 05:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

So far you have done a great job, please continue with the same vigor :-) , We need lot more references.. there are very few books about Colombo, I agree with you on the pictures, it need not be along the right side of the article, Dundee indeed is a good example of how pictures are used. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 05:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please take part in the mediation Talk:Muhammad/Mediation‎ to solve this dispute. I am leaving this message here because you have shown interest in this on Muhammad talk page. Wassalam. --- ALM 11:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 11:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Assalam-o-Alliakum, Once again your voice is required at Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion, looks like we might have a consensus there which is good. --- ALM 20:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I have tried to resolve the conflict by creating a neutral article that is composed of both the articles without any attributions othersiwse we will alaways have edit wars. Hope you would support my attempt at harmonious editing withoiut further need to resort to edit warsRaveenS 15:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Great Article RaveenS, Do u want me to add this to the template (Sri Lankan Conflict)? I think it should be included in the see also section what do you suggest? ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 06:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

One down many more neutral one like this to go it was already linked in the template as assassinations attributed to the gov.t and LTTe will automatically redirected to this one, like you said you can delete those and add this like you say in just one placeRaveenS 15:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

OK looks like a edit war situation, I will let SLR handle it for the time being then I will take it to mediation later:-))) meanwhile you can make your view heard on [1] Thanks RaveenS 18:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Hello Netmonger, this barnstar is awarded for your ingenuity in coming with the Sri Lankan conflict template that resolved a lots of conflicts RaveenS 17:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You voiced your opinion in the original straw poll which has caused some confusion. Please do the same in a new version, Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion_.28untainted.29, which should be clear and allow us to better assess consensus. gren グレン 22:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Please sign if any of these things applies to your understanding of this issue. Please put you name under all of the options you think would be acceptable. You can sign all or none of these, I'm hoping this will give us a more-fine grained understanding of the issue. [2]

Hi Netmonger!

I looked up the file you mentioned - I got it as a sound file. MediaWiki displays an image to show that a sound file has been uploaded. Was that what you were seeing? The actual link should provide a clickable sound file... although uploads of this type to Wikimedia's site won't play directly in Wikipedia - they need to be uploaded to Wikipedia or better still to Commons - assuming in the latter case that you have copyright clearance for the file.

Hope this helps and happy editing! 〈REDVEЯS〉 19:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Do you have any sources on that ? RaveenS 13:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes I do

• [3]
• [4]
• [5]
• [6]

there are few others that you required to have subscription available at

• [7]
• [8]

hope these would be of help ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 11:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, can we write an article on that ? do you think it is notable enough ?RaveenS 22:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

It surely is notable enough.. Please go ahead and create an article.. I really dont have the time for it right now.. sorry ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 08:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I will and in the process I found notable, verfiable and neutral articles for Mawanella riots in 2002 against muslimsRiots_and_pogroms_in_Sri_Lanka#2002_anti-Muslim_riots. I think we have enough material to write about that. RaveenS 23:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thats good, that riot requires coverage, most of the information related to it was suppressed by the government at that time. Especially they suppressed the destroying of a Masjid by certain racist Sinhalese and urinating on the Masjid ablution pool, this information could've started another war in this country. These days I am busy with some other research work, so I am not at all active in wikipedia, I like you to create these articles, later I can contribute to improve them. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 07:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from World Trade Center. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RJASE1 ^Talk 18:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on World Trade Center. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. RJASE1 ^Talk 18:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Well I generally stick to 1RR in this particular case I reverted twice, because the other editor is not bothered to explain his revert would you be kind as to post the same message there please. thanks ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 18:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Holy Sheep, you are one of them aren't you.. :0) I am giving up.. good luck with censoring.. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 18:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually, you reverted at least 3 times. And if 9/11 conspiracy theories had been there before, it was 4. But, if you're going to stop, I'm not going to report. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Dear Netmonger,

I am the original user of Rajsingam & DoDoBirds and shared the passwords with three of my friends as I am busy with my book "German Memories in Asia". As I have some problems over a few edits on Sri Lanka Conflict with them, I think one of them is posting various people which might damage my reputation.

I am not responsible these acts.

I apologize for my carelessness, which caused you, inconvenience.

Rajkumar Kanagasingam 08:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Could you tell me the friends you were sharing your password with? Is it true that RaveenS is the one brought up the idea of "Netmonger is Arsath" it's very disheartening to hear something like that, because this literally is back stabbing. Answering my questions would help you clear your name. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 08:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

They are my schoolmates. Mostly we used to communicate via e-mail. These days they are very angry I am not that strong enough defending Tamil issues. Raveen gave some idea that "Netmonger might be Arsath" and I shared with my friends.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 08:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)