Content deleted Content added
→Take note: reply to a fan club member Tags: Reverted Reply |
Removing this nonsense. Tags: Manual revert Reverted 2017 wikitext editor |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::::I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. [[User:Nemov|Nemov]] ([[User talk:Nemov#top|talk]]) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
:::::I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. [[User:Nemov|Nemov]] ([[User talk:Nemov#top|talk]]) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::::: Did you see [[Talk:Jean Sibelius|the Sibelius discussion]], where I asked how many more RfCs we'll need (which was almost exactly a year ago). Sorry if repetition, - my memory ... and then past midnight ;) - It was with [[Islossningen i Uleå älv|a Sibelius composition]] that I illustrated hopes. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 23:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
:::::: Did you see [[Talk:Jean Sibelius|the Sibelius discussion]], where I asked how many more RfCs we'll need (which was almost exactly a year ago). Sorry if repetition, - my memory ... and then past midnight ;) - It was with [[Islossningen i Uleå älv|a Sibelius composition]] that I illustrated hopes. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 23:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Take note == |
|||
I'm not going diff hunting, apologise: {{green|"Ah, the "temperament of an artist defense" for an editor with multiple blocks for bad behavior and continued hostility to others. Some of these arguments read like WP:FANCLUB. No wonder SchroCat has gotten away with this behavior for so long. Nemov (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)"}} - or, they may just be a group of well-intentioned, civil people who hold a different opinion to you. And if nice, civil comments from nice, civil editors reads like a WP:FANCLUB to you, what might the club be called that contains a group of people who appear to be bullying a hugely productive editor whose only desire is to improve the project? [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD|2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD|talk]]) 17:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Your block/edit record speaks for itself. I'm not going to waste any more valuable time on your problematic Wikipedia behavior. If other editors want to twist themselves into logic pretzels defending your incivility they should be prepared to defend their choices. I've said my piece on the issue and my conscious is clear. Hopefully you learn to be a non-disruptive member of the community, but history suggests that is unlikely. [[User:Nemov|Nemov]] ([[User talk:Nemov#top|talk]]) 17:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::My block record? I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not SchroCat. Those in glass houses shouldn't cast stones, is my point. It smacks of utter hypocrisy criticising someone for "incivility", whilst you casually throw around incivilities by accusing others of being a "fanclub". Permit me to say, but you're not coming out of that discussion looking very good at all. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD|2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD|talk]]) 17:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::If you're not SchroCat then this is embarrassing, you're defending an uncivil editor with a long track record and calling for civility. This is your "this isn't a [[WP:FANCLUB]]" defense? Please leave me alone with this anonymous nonsense. [[User:Nemov|Nemov]] ([[User talk:Nemov#top|talk]]) 18:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:13, 15 December 2022
Check user?
A part of me still thinks that the IP(s) might be someone pretending to be SchroCat. But, if it really is him? then, he's lost my support. GoodDay (talk) 22:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Based on the content he was discussing I have no reason to believe it's a different user. He's been super active on a few articles under discussion and it's been super confusing for users coming in who don't know who it is and then add the hostility angle and it's a huge headache. Nemov (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I remember Stanley Kubrick in 2015, when I was taken to AE (arbitration enforcement) because I dared to ask the question if [really] the principal editors should decide about infobox or not. I was told not to do it again. The whole discussion is worth reading, but for users with little time, the summary of the close should do. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- All that stuff is over my head. This really isn't a content dispute situation it's an editor conduct problem. Nemov (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked the future arbitrators, and they saw (almost) nothing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. Nemov (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Did you see the Sibelius discussion, where I asked how many more RfCs we'll need (which was almost exactly a year ago). Sorry if repetition, - my memory ... and then past midnight ;) - It was with a Sibelius composition that I illustrated hopes. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. Nemov (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked the future arbitrators, and they saw (almost) nothing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- All that stuff is over my head. This really isn't a content dispute situation it's an editor conduct problem. Nemov (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I remember Stanley Kubrick in 2015, when I was taken to AE (arbitration enforcement) because I dared to ask the question if [really] the principal editors should decide about infobox or not. I was told not to do it again. The whole discussion is worth reading, but for users with little time, the summary of the close should do. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)