Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Dear, You made an edit on the said article and modified the sourced contents. Have you gone through the given sources before making an attempt to edit. Just do it and also refer the talk page of the said article where I have given a line from from the source. For your easy reference I have mentioned the related page no. too. Thanks.--MahenSingha (Talk)

Yo man could you please go over to the Al-khalid tank and talk page and clear up all the confusion there.

sir reference to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fakhar_Abbas

i am contacting you to help to revive this article please note the person has done a lot in different fields but he is quite media shy and don't want to be named for his achievements regarding the complaints about references here are few articles within Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22fakhar-i-abbas%22&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=5wg4hahw6m7r2haav0bu1r6yi

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Fakhar_Abbas.html

and also here are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMGLg1Ja_Qw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFIrA7TULxA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLfhCosAPbw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smS2r_WYQRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WuyUnJX0QU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spklHufXs5Y

https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&oq=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&aqs=chrome..69i57.11151j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

i can provide more if required please help restoring this page or let me know what else they require

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

1. Courcelles (submissions)
2. Kosack (submissions)
3. Kees08 (submissions)
4. SounderBruce (submissions)
5. Cas Liber (submissions)
6. Nova Crystallis (submissions)
7. Iazyges (submissions)
8. Ceranthor (submissions)

All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

• Cas Liber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
• Courcelles (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
• Kosack (submissions) wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
• Cartoon network freak (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
• Usernameunique (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
• Zanhe (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
• Aoba47 (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
• Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
• MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
• Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
• Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
• Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

Hi H now channel is closed and move to Publisher website HTV : health, taste, vitality. its also owned by ziauddin group. I request to you please move this wiki page on HTV.

Thank You

SEO Team Lead HTV.

You can view it here: Template:Did you know nominations/Zara Abid.

I encourage you to nominate future articles you create, expand 5x in size, or improve to GA, as most of the content in DYK is from North America and Europe. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The Squirrel Conspiracy. Feel free to let me know if there's anything I could help with. Mar4d (talk) 09:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistani people of Zimbabwean descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Mar4d, thank you for your message on my talk page. I appreciate you letting me know that you created the article and in the future, I will certainly try to expand it. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 20:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Mar4d, thank you for your recent creation of Pathans in India. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 20:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anupam That's very kind, thanks! Actually this article could have been written a long time ago; but it took us until 2020. Better late than never I guess :) Hopefully future readers will be able to benefit from the information compiled in it over the years to come. Mar4d (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mar4d, you're very welcome! I added a section on "Education" to the article today, which I hope you like. Additionally, you might find this article to be helpful as you expand the article. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 19:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anupam Thank you. I hope to be able to go through the source and add anything of value to the article if I'm able to. Best regards, Mar4d (talk) 19:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistani silent films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pakistani Federation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Pakistani Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  19:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir, i wanted to ask why do we have a separate article for each and every person who belongs to PTM? Although i agree that Manzoor Pashteen, Mohsin Dawar and Ali wazir should be given space at wikipedia but why do we have for each and every member of PTM ? Like here [[1]] the list includes even those people who have no contribution or any impact except for Manzoor pashteen's name. Do you think they should be nominated for deletion as many of these people are just common people supporting a movement. Some of them were part of ANP and PMAP and never had articles associated to them but it seems like there is an ill intention behind long articles on these people. I would appreciate your insight on this as i see too many articles written related to this movement by only one user.

Example: [[2]] [[3]]

I think this is based on some agenda. Kami2018 (talk) 06:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kami2018. Please refer to WP:GNG and WP:RS to get a better idea of what is considered notable, and what references are suitable. If you feel there are any specific articles which do not fulfil this criteria, you are free to nominate them for deletion and follow the process. Best regards, Mar4d (talk) 11:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sozo Water Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability for this water park. No references other than its own web-site and searches yield advertisements, trip Advisor, social media but nothing of any substance. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sozo Water Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sozo Water Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mar4d! Hope you read this in best of the health. I want to discuss very important issue with you, user:Alishernavoi (interested in Karachi-related articles) is making disruptive edits on article of Lahore. He is reverting my edits again and again just to add the blurry Lahorecollage3. To avoid edit war, I came here to request you to involve as a Pakistani administrator.

The image of Lahorecollage3 consists of:

• Central library which is not a proper representation of city and should be moved to the education section.
• Shadowy picture of Badshahi mosque that shows just half of the mosque in collage.

After realizing this, I changed the images of infobox by adding better image of Badshahi mosque instead of the shadowy image and added image of renowned Kalma Underpass instead of Central library.

Now, I request you to view the both versions yourself and decide what suits better.

• My version of infobox images [4]
• Alishernavoi's version [5]

I also requested the user to come to the talkpage if he has any issues with the changes for the betterment of the article. [6]

Innocent Paki (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Innocent Paki. I am not an administrator. I have looked at the discussion on your talk page, and to be honest, Alishernavoi has made a fair point too. Your best bet would be to take this to the Lahore talk page and try to discuss with Alishernavoi there - I see there's already a section from April - or convince them why you want the collage to be changed. If both of you fail to reach a mutual understanding, you can always opt for an WP:RFC and invite input from uninvolved editors. Not much else help I can offer unfortunately. And in case you don't end up gaining consensus, sometimes it's better to WP:DROPTHESTICK and move on. The montage is not a big deal to be edit warring over, and the current one looks just fine too even if it's not changed. Kind regards, Mar4d (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mar4d! Yes, I totally agree that Alishernavoi has also made a fair point too and that is why I wanna discuss the issue on the talk page and settle it with mutual cooperation. All I want was to seek guidance from you which you have given. Thank you so much for sparing your precious time. Innocent Paki (talk) 20:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have closed your appeal of your topic ban at WP:AE as having a consensus to lift it. I have logged the succesful appeal at the AELOG for 2018. You are no longer topic banned. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: Appreciated, thanks. Mar4d (talk) 05:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed a request about an arbitration decision where you had participated. You can view it here. Shashank5988 (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]