Welcome to my talk page : )

Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.

Start a new talk topic.

Archives: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Aloha. The May 2008 issue of the Hawaiʻi WikiProject newsletter has been published. To change your delivery options or unsubscribe, visit this link. Mahalo nui loa. WikiProject Hawaiʻi 17:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not engage in disruptive and/or unseemly conduct like you did here - please also ensure you do not (in the future) attempt to intimidate an editor by threatening to retaliate, if they continue to pursue the dispute resolution process. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, is this a joke? I'm not finding it funny. --MPerel 19:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not a joke. Perhaps your frivolous claim of bad faith assumptions in reply is?

The WQA page does not exist only to endorse people's comments - however, it does not exist to make threats of any sort, let alone this (If you don't stop pursuing the DR process against him, then I will consider pursuing it against you for your problematic behavior (even though I would not if you drop it)). That is retaliatory - plain and simple. The DR process does not exist for such a purpose. Therefore, you have been warned - there is no assumption of bad faith. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply here. --MPerel 20:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MPerel, you shouldnt take trolling seriously. Just revert gratuitous 'warnings' and be done. Dont feed it. That user in question is also as we speak, endorsing a "mudsling and run" of me on tha same board. That board seems to be some kind of gathering place of all those whose POV pushing gets busted or something. Cheers. Sarvagnya 22:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His behavior toward me certainly did take me by surprise. In my nearly four years tenure here, I’ve never had anyone aggressively threaten me this way, particularly since it was unprovoked. His threats can't be taken too seriously, however, as a brief perusal of his contributions reveals a history consisting solely of hanging out on dispute talk pages stirring up trouble inflaming disputing editors, and then handing out ominous sounding warnings. I can’t even see where he’s actually edited any articles, so he has nil credibility in judging editors. --MPerel 08:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) Watch your words or he and his friends may haul you up on that board for "incivility". Truth be said, you sized him up quite accurately. I've seen him from up close for as long as he's been an editor and I dont recall any contributions of his to article space or talk page discussion worth mention. His beef with me is that I busted his screed on Carnatic music sourced to patently non-RS and now he seems to have made it his life's mission to go around socializing on any and sundry 'boards', masquerading as an "uninvolved editor" and ostensibly, one "with experience". That he does, when he's not posing as the 'leader' of the dysfunctional "Article rating team" of the WP:INDIA project. Also curiously, WP:CIVIL seems to have become the last refuge of those who get their POV pushing busted. Sarvagnya 18:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Unfortunately, all three flickr images lack the free licensing Wikipedia prefers, but you might be able to contact the copyright holder directly and ask them if it would be ok to use one on Wikipedia with a license we can use. My guess is that the author of this photo might be willing to change the CC licensing (it's presently tagged as Noncommercial-No Derivative, which we can't use), but I'm not sure about the other two. Let me know if I can help in any way. Viriditas (talk) 00:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]