Archives

/Lucky 6.9 talk archive 1 /Lucky 6.9 talk archive 2 /Lucky 6.9 talk archive 3 /Lucky 6.9 talk archive 4 (current)

Hello! Please leave a message at the bottom of the page. Also: Please note that I do a lot of new pages patrolling. If I've deleted your work and you have a concern, I'll gladly discuss the issue. Abusive posts will be ignored and subsequently rolled back, so please keep it civil. Thanks!

My page for Eastside Fury Percussion Ensemble was deleted. I removed the requested materials by User:Lucky 6.9 in regards to instructor bios. The remaining content is specifically for providing additional information to a subcategory of the Winter Gurad International page. See Independent World Percussion. I think I sumbitted the deletion review right? [1]

Hey. I guess I wasn't shocked to find that A wiki article I wrote about my music project was deleted. However, I'm not sure your grounds for destroying what I'd worked on today justifiable. You called it vandalsim, but gave no reason for doing so. I thought the point of website was to provide information and when I tried to do so this happened. Anyways, I'm not sure if this is the area where complaints are voiced but since I couldnt find any other place to do so, I figured this would work.

Its a real movement. I have documented it in no less than four reliable published sources: Texas Public Radio, San Antonio Current, San Antonio Express-News and MySpace. I think this is some kind of plot to censor articles about San Antonio because of a regional prejudice. I want to know why Keep San Antonio Lame is deleted and Keep Austin Weird is allowed to stay up.

Adding this on. I really want to know why. I see no reason why KSAL is any less legitimate than Keep Austin Weird. The Keep Austin Weird page even goes so far as to describe local "weird" people. How is that more reliable?

I was originally told that KSAL was deleted because it lacked reliable sourcing. MySpace notwithstanding my other sources are public radio and two different local newspapers. Isn't that good enough?

Twice now I have tried to create a page about the Underground Football League and twice you have deleted it for now apparent reason other than it being "inappropriate" everything on the site was 100% factual and legitimate, there was nothing crude or vulgar or "inappropriate" anywhere on the page and you could cross reference everything on the page with the UFL's website (which i am the creater/owner/operator of). So yeah if you could give me a real reason (as in not a vague one) and ways to keep the page from being deleted in the future that would be appreciated.

I have started working on this page and you keep deleting it for some reason. It is about a movie released in 2004. You let other movies be entered on this site and I don't understand why you won't allow this one.

Perl Object-Oriented Persistence << there's a worldwide audience for that? Why hasn't this been deleted? I fail to see it's worldwide appeal and marketability. I would be curious to see the number of hits this has generated and then leaving a UFL page up for a similar amount of time and checking its hits...i think i'm just going to keep reposting my UFl site until i get banned and then i'll try wading through wikipedia's enormous sea of unnecessary red tape for an appeal. But yeah get back to me about the millions of people interested in Perl Object-Oriented Persistence.

According to the Wikipedia:Notability (people) article, one of the criteria for inclusion is a "A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following" and "Name recognition" all of which Dreadhead has in the Indianapolis Colts community. The Dreadhead appears in the team's opening video, in the program and on the big screen as "AAA - Fan of Game," in addition to his weekly occurences on the big screen in RCA Dome. In the Indianapolis community, the Dreadhead has been recognized on countless occasions, and in his former college community of Muncie, IN. He has also appeared on several Colts Caravan promotional tour stops, recognizable as such.

You have previously warned (twice) the user Jshama, and he was recently banned by Academic Challenger. One of the "vandalizing actions" was his edit of Dragostea din tei. The edit merely consisted of adding the lyrics of the song. If this was somehow inappropriate, it still does not seem to be vandilizing. [Differences]. I would like to know if this block was inappropriate so that I may appeal to Academic Challenger to repeal the block. --Naruttebayo

You once stated that you went to Club 33. May I inquire as to how you got in? Are you a member, or did a member allow you the privilege? Just curious. Gracias. --Ali'i 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It sounds like you had a great time. Next time I'm in California, I plan on being there. Might I add that you seem like a nice, genuine person... unlike many here at WP, no offense. Keep up the good work. I've heard Kerry is a great person from others as well. Now I just have to learn to play the harpsichord and I'll be set. Mahalo. --Ali'i 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky - This page you recently deleted has been recreated by same author. As there does not seem to be a word of English on the page I was going to tag it, but checked contributor first and saw your comments.--Bilbo B 13:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Here's another barnstar for you for all of your newpage vandal watching. Diez2 03:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you liked your break. :) Hope I've kept your talk page sane; these past few days have been odd. oO -WarthogDemon 06:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Lucky, (i had a name change) I'm in talks with him, hope to restore it soon. In the meantime can I request your input to the Safiyya bint Huyayy article. Please read the talk page on the current edit war issue. Safiyya was a jewish girl who was taken by Mohammad as a concubine. You can read the article and it tells you the story in all the bloody detail black on white, yet when I put on the lead paragraph that she was a concubine it was reverted by another editor a number of times, and this has gone on. Please comment on the talk page there. FrummerThanThou 07:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it.. why redirect the El-Manial article to Cairo? --Ahmed 07:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh... I guess the Districts of Cairo template will need some work. --Ahmed 07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The send me a link to where i can post a 'personal message' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OllieQueen (talk • contribs) 19:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the help. Is there any way to make the title of the new article Serbius though? (Rather than User: OllieQueen)

sorry, i'm confused. i am trying to request a deletion review for better than. can't figure out why you deleted it in the first place though, it's a contemporary philosophical principle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kismetologist (talk • contribs) 19:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

lucky...i got the information and the essay from the philosophical source...ie 'messenger' or speaker for the movement The Fellowship of Fortuna. The speaker created this philosophy Better Than. It is new, so i don't believe it would be widely referenced except on the fellowship of fortuna site which i liked to. i received the essay (unpublished) from the source himself. what do you suggest here? i think it is an important philosophy and the background, i believe is important too.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of fortuna (philosophy). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of better than. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

I wonder do you even check the integrity of the sources which are being refered in the above mentioned article? In the category of Further Reading, where does this highly controversial person comes called Rober Spencer? I know you will not agree. But just look at the wiki article jihad and look at the contents of jihad watch website. Consider my references to be my arguments (please). Have a look at this video and tell me whats wrong here? how is this media totally unreliable. The same thing is applied to jihad watch by comparing to the wiki article Jihad.

My key point is, why dont you consider the integrity and controversy of the sources being refered?

Your arguments are welcomed. But I just want to make you see few references in comparison. VirtualEye 08:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking around and I saw you offered to nominate him for adminship. I've done the same thing.diff Great minds think alike, eh? When he feels ready to test his luck with going into the supply closet to get the mop and bucket, make sure you let me co-nominate him. Happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 18:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to expand details on Old Newingtonians who are Olympians and medallists so I was listing their Olympic achivements and intended to add further biographical material but now I can't. How would you suggest i go about this.--Sbrandons 04:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought thats what stubs are for? so people can expand the article. DarkCastle 04:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. DarkCastle 04:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i am kind of confused, I am new at this, but I just made a page for a church located in wylie, texas: Jesus Name Pentecostal Church The Refuge, and I was wondering why it was deleted. I really put a lot of work into it, and its a real church, and it was instantly deleted. please help or explain. thanks.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athepirate08 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I've asked an admin on this already and he was unsure but said "maybe" on it, so I'd like another admin's opinion. I'm considering making an article for a small ghost town in Colorado. Emphasis on small. I can't find it in an atlas. I've googled the town and most of the google hits are from the movie Red Dawn that was filmed there. I did find coordinates of the place and at least one or two places listing it as a mining town in the past. The town is Calumet, Colorado if you wish to do the search yourself. My question is, if I have the coordinates, list the source, note the movie, and find some reliable reference of it being a mining town it'll still be a stubby article. Would it be a notable article? -WarthogDemon 07:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the Spell for Chamelion movie page I creaed? - Peregrinefisher 07:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to guess it's because you delete a bunch of bad pages, and mine was caught in the net somehow. If you're deleting so many you can't answer, I understand, otherwise reply here. - Peregrinefisher 08:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just searched for my page about my band I posted the other night to find it was gone...Why?, we are semi-legitimate and I want to get the word out there for us to try and maybe get discovered. So please, tell me why. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keithwich63 (talk • contribs).

Hi. Thanks for patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism and erroneous new pages. I'm wondering if you could review your decision to delete my stub on the Alburnus Maior NGO. It's notable in terms of its successful advocacy for suspending the Rosia Montana mining project: a proposal to build the largest open-pit gold mine in Europe. Google search link -- 41,300 results.

Thanks Jackk 15:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much Appreciated! Thanks for your time.

Jackk 16:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i am working on rewriting the text that i submitted, that was ony a placeholder while i did some research on the companies background. it is not an advertisement. as i am not related to this company other than being a customer. i am putting this page up because i was reading the page about the australian christian channel and noticed that there was no info on this company which funds it. Thanks, god bless bdrenenrt

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Halo2Leagues.com. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by CBTS Pennywise1 (talk • contribs).

The other day I decided to have the article Lynn Harless deleted, as I didn't have as much info on her as I though. (Originally I thought she was a band member, but after finding I was incorrect I had nothing more to say other than her managing of bands and her being Justin Timberlake's mom.) And now I'm wondering if I should change these four people into redirects:

• Amanda Latona
• Danay Ferrer
• Jenny Morris (singer)
• Veronica Finn

I'm considering this because they seem to be two stubby. (However the other two members have more of a history than just being in Innosense.) Not sure if I should keep them as is or go along with that. Part of this is because of a nasty vandal incidence, so I'm a bit biased, so I'd like to know what you think. :) -WarthogDemon 02:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or shouldn't I be asking? >_> Forgive me if that's the case. -WarthogDemon 00:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Sorry 'bout that. I looked at a couple and they seemed to be of sufficient length. I usually take the single-sentence entries and convert them. - Lucky 6.9 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was the 1st lady to vote in the USA after 1807.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by James possamai (talk • contribs) 16:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Hi they are trying to delete the renetto article you reinstated. What is your take, is his reason even valid?

FrummerThanThou 17:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lucky

thanks for your guidance on the fortuna (philosophy) entry. I have rewritten the entry on your recommendation and added lots more external links which will prove the notability and scope of the philosophy. Should i run this by you or just post it?

I'm curious as to why the page on Tommy Girvin was deleted. Gringo300 21:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on gathering information on Tommy Girvin. I think i should probably provide some links as references, too. Gringo300 00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/* Jodi Foster voice */ Was that fast? That looked fast... Wow. - 152.91.9.144 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was oblique to the point of obfuscation... What I meant was you appear to have deleted that page within two seconds of my having tagged it for deletion. I was impressed with your alacrity, and the "Jodi Foster" thing was a quote from Maverick (film) with respect to a quick-draw gunslinger. So, umm, yeah... Keep up the good work. - 152.91.9.144 03:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for an opinion here: [2] and I'm wondering if you missed it or if I shouldn't be asking questions on talk pages like that. >_>; -WarthogDemon 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) Seems one of them was just marked an AfD. I'll just see what happens to it and then consider the same actions for the other pages I mentioned. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lucky 6.9. I know that you're too busy on vandal reverting, and deleting non-notable articles. Anyways, I just want you to explain how could I arrange my template boxes on my user page. In my opinion, most of wikipedian uses babel to arrange the templates on their user page. I know that some templates has been moved into other names, deleted, or some templates doesn't work on babels like such template User who is birthday is May 14, and favourite color is Blue. Could you please help me on this? I'm having trouble to arrange templates on my user page. Cheers! Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 16:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this is BobafettH23. On Kingalex56, on the link of; Why The @#$% I was banned, an ip address (82.7.125.98) vandalized that page by writing "fuck you", and erasing some stuff. Let me know when the matter has been taken of. Thanks. BobafettH23 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did your retirement last? Brainhell 01:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your contributions and your help in my quest to keep Wikipedia a Clean and Reliable source for Information. I've seen your name pop up quite often in the recent changes article and you've been deleting a lot of articles that I've been marking. I want to let you know your actions are not going unnoticed and I appreciate every little thing you do for the WikiCommunity. I thank you, and Beg you to have a great day. Take it easy, and If it's easy, take it twice!

• No, Thank You!

I very much appreciate your contributions to wikipedia and admire your dedication to the site. I think it's great that you of all people are an Admin, because you uphold and defend all that is good in Wikipedia. I appreciate all your work and the fact that you even had time to respond to me. Though I am likely not a well enough established member of Wikipedia to award you a Barnstar, I most certainly will remember to do so later. I often do see your name pop up on the Recent changes log, and I smile every time I do, because I know someone is working just as hard as I am to keep Wikipedia a great public databank of credible, reliable information.

With Deep Respect and gratitude Carlo V. Sexron 02:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron[reply]

P.s.

Though I haven't yet given you a barnstar, I can at least throw this back at you!

Thank You! You ARE appreciated!

Carlo V. Sexron 02:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron[reply]

• Honored

I thank you very much for your kind words and again taking time out of your day to communicate with me and respond to my message. I would be more than ecstatic to continue helping Wikipedia be a finer site than it already is. It's nice to know that someone is watching my work too! And I thank you for that! It makes every movement seem to go further and bit by bit, I like to think that we are both doing our parts for the community.

With Sincere Respect and Joy Carlo V. Sexron 03:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron[reply]

• [[user:Flowerykewlstuffz123]]

Can you please do somethiing about this user? It seems like they've only created useless nonsense and is trying to defend two articles s/he made with No sources. Although I admit I did use the 'spam' tag on them, I think it was effective in getting the point through that they are basically articles that are going to get deleted anyway. He made a page for slang that NO ONE in the world uses, only his school, which should have been merged with his school anyway.

• Thanks For the Encouragement

I'm sure you get a lot of that as an Admin, I think I really needed that because I thought there would be no Justice to that. Until my dreams come true and there is a Template:Db-crap tag, I guess db-vandalism and db-nonsense will have to fill the gap.

• Keep Up the Good Work!

Hang in there, Wikipedia Loves you!

I appreciate all the hard work and effort you give to the Wikipedia Community!

Trying to relieve some stress and pressure, Carlo V. Sexron 11:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron[reply]

Someone whom I am fairly certain is a sockpuppet of User:MinervaSimpson and User:MrBullockx is back as User:Systemex. -WarthogDemon 02:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how it goes when listing Sockpuppets but I believe it should be a sockpuppet of MrBullockx (that was made first). -WarthogDemon 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, sorry. One more thing. Should MinervaSimpson have the same message? It only says there that the user is simply blocked indefinite; no sock puppet message. Sorry bout that. ^_^; -WarthogDemon 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The choice is yours of course, but I find it slightly suspicious that he mentioned User:Wooty, the one who placed the sockpuppet block on User:MinervaSimpson. Oo -WarthogDemon 03:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey lucky....thanks for all the help. I think the revise will show more background etc to the movement/philosophy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kismetologist (talk • contribs).

Hello may i ask why you deleted my article? Nareklm 03:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well i was still in the process of making it. Nareklm 03:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well it was Smbat III, if you check the delete log i think its that. Nareklm 03:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :-D Nareklm 03:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lucky 6.9, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Lucky 6.9]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086^{Talk | Contribs} 04:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both, as in adding the category and the userbox? You don't need to. Just putting the userbox automatically adds you to the category! James086^{Talk | Contribs} 10:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Popark.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i created an entry for Billy Wright the poet who was featured in the recent issue of Words Dance and also has published his own works and it was immediately deleted. why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.158.103.247 (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Lucky 6.9, have this barnstar for all your hard work salting articles that are patent nonsense/recreated hoaxes/non-notable biographies etc., and for your anti-vandalism work! SunStar Nettalk 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you delete, and then salt User:SunStar Net/Thisisapatentnonsensepage at my request?? Glad you like the barnstar! --SunStar Net^talk 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please salt it for me. Keep the good work up new page patrolling.... see my NPP exploits at

User:SunStar Net/Pages I tagged for speedy deletion, and feel free to review me at Wikipedia:Editor review/SunStar Net 2.

Thanks, --SunStar Net^talk 00:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You left a message to me about the Norman Window page i made and said: "Using sockpuppet accounts to repost nonsense is a blockable offense. Please do not attempt to do so again. Thank you. - Lucky 6.9 04:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)"

First of all, Im sorry if i was posting nonsense, I'll be sure to cite works and sources next time Second of all, i would just like to make it clear that i did not make a sockpuppet account, if you check your logs, you can see the IPs are different for the 2 posts and the my IP from this message will confirm i did not write the article the second time, only the first time. Thanks

He's just put up a controversial article as a Featured Candidate. (Just like MrBullockx. Might want to have checkuser for all 3.) The article is here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/New antisemitism. -WarthogDemon 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I've reblocked Systemex following confirmation he was a sockpuppet. the wub "?!" 23:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Optigan35011.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi lucky, i posted the revised fortuna (philosophy) article with the added references etc, but it was taken down with no reason given. i don't know how to access why took it down either....would you have any direction to give me? i don't want to just put it up again and get slapped you know...thanks so much lucky...i know your probably busy busy

He is a real person worthy of a page. If you have a valid reason for repeatedly deleting it, please give it to me rather than constantly removing what I post. kthanksbye Nbruschi 02:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the reverts, I did not see what you wrote on my page until just now. Now that there is an article page I will work on expanding it. Thanks for your help and sorry for the trouble. Nbruschi 02:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry again for the confusion. Nbruschi 03:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so why can't that sentence be the start of an article? Other people who are knowledgable or currently researching can add to it Rhthpr

One more thing... you or your bot deleted my first question on your talk page, so why can't I blank out my own talk page? Rhthpr 08:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no bot... -WarthogDemon 08:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, one evening I had the idea to check your logs for any articles that get recreated, and retag them. I was pratically editing non-stop for about 20 minutes. Needless to say, I have a small idea of the chaos you have to deal with. Continue with the good work as well! *Salutes.* :) -WarthogDemon 08:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]