Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Kebman (talk | contribs)
Line 79: Line 79:
:Thank you for your thoughts and feelings on the matters. They shall be summarily ignored. Have a nice day. --[[User:Kebman|Kebman]] ([[User talk:Kebman#top|talk]]) 06:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
:Thank you for your thoughts and feelings on the matters. They shall be summarily ignored. Have a nice day. --[[User:Kebman|Kebman]] ([[User talk:Kebman#top|talk]]) 06:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
::Kebman, "summarily ignoring" [[User:Jayjg]]'s note is less cute than insightful. You were just reverted on [[Talk:Islamophobia]] by {{U|Objective3000}}, and your rant on [[Talk:FrontPage Magazine]] is equally unencyclopedic. Please review [[WP:NOTFORUM]] and [[WP:NOTHERE]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
::Kebman, "summarily ignoring" [[User:Jayjg]]'s note is less cute than insightful. You were just reverted on [[Talk:Islamophobia]] by {{U|Objective3000}}, and your rant on [[Talk:FrontPage Magazine]] is equally unencyclopedic. Please review [[WP:NOTFORUM]] and [[WP:NOTHERE]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
:::Doing a bit of the old '''censorship''' are we? Well, I didn't think highly of you before, so I guess I'll think even lower of you now. As for "unencyclopedic", it refers to the article, not discussions on how to improve it - and it is in dire need of improvement. But instead of improving it, or even discussing ''how or if'' it can be improved, you choose to "revert", or in effect censor, criticism and suggestions. In contrast to you, I was ready to stand bare chested with the public arguments being made. You, on the other hand, are so embarassed at the criticisme that you'd rather hide it than answer it. I smell bias and cowardice. I smell hypocrisy. --[[User:Kebman|Kebman]] ([[User talk:Kebman#top|talk]]) 09:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:52, 12 May 2019

Welcome!

Hello, Kebman! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

User Age

@I dream of horses: So I think there is another user with the same name that is also mine, and that I may have registered over it, or it was overwritten, or whatever. That's how I lost my contributions. Or rather, my previous account. I think it was either KEBman or kebman. This is of course Kebman. :p Would be fun to get my real account back, if at all possible. --Kebman (talk) 03:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found the root of the problem. My old account has indeed been renamed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kebman~enwiki If I could get it back, I'd be really happy.--Kebman (talk) 04:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wonder if there's a solution to this? -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see it before, but this is the talk-page of my actual account. Wish I could get access to it again, as I think this is due to the account merger. I was also booted from the Norwegian user page during this process, and thus I've also lost contribs there as well. :/ KEBman (talk) 18:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And now I even found my old password. I think it was due to mixups of different accounts on different projects, and problems with large and small letters to boot. Confusing! :D Kebman (talk) 13:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Barbara Lerner Spectre are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thoughts and feelings on the matters. They shall be summarily ignored. Have a nice day. --Kebman (talk) 06:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kebman, "summarily ignoring" User:Jayjg's note is less cute than insightful. You were just reverted on Talk:Islamophobia by Objective3000, and your rant on Talk:FrontPage Magazine is equally unencyclopedic. Please review WP:NOTFORUM and WP:NOTHERE. Drmies (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doing a bit of the old censorship are we? Well, I didn't think highly of you before, so I guess I'll think even lower of you now. As for "unencyclopedic", it refers to the article, not discussions on how to improve it - and it is in dire need of improvement. But instead of improving it, or even discussing how or if it can be improved, you choose to "revert", or in effect censor, criticism and suggestions. In contrast to you, I was ready to stand bare chested with the public arguments being made. You, on the other hand, are so embarassed at the criticisme that you'd rather hide it than answer it. I smell bias and cowardice. I smell hypocrisy. --Kebman (talk) 09:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply