Content deleted Content added
→MDPI: r |
Just Step Sideways (talk | contribs) →ARCA: new section |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
I distinctly recall that [[MDPI]] is considered to be a questionable source. Is that still so? [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F&title=Special%3ALinkSearch It seems to be widely used]. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 19:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC) |
I distinctly recall that [[MDPI]] is considered to be a questionable source. Is that still so? [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F&title=Special%3ALinkSearch It seems to be widely used]. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 19:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
: I think it is no better than OMICS. I will have a look at some of the cites. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 19:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC) |
: I think it is no better than OMICS. I will have a look at some of the cites. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 19:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
== ARCA == |
|||
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Michael Hardy]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration guide]] may be of use. |
|||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbitration CA notice --> [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 20:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:50, 25 September 2018
←
- A request for adminship is open for discussion.
- Negative DYK hooks and the BLP policy
- 2024 RfA review, phase II
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
MDPI
Greetings,
I distinctly recall that MDPI is considered to be a questionable source. Is that still so? It seems to be widely used. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I think it is no better than OMICS. I will have a look at some of the cites. Guy (Help!) 19:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
ARCA
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Michael Hardy and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Beeblebrox (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)