There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:AC/DS, "Editors issuing alerts are expected to ensure that no editor receives more than one alert per area of conflict per year. Any editor who issues alerts disruptively may be sanctioned." In Special:Diff/1081348446, you posted a discretionary sanctions alert for the "Eastern Europe or the Balkans" topic area on User talk:Elinruby, when there was already an alert dated 24 March 2022 for the same topic area at User talk:Elinruby § Discretionary sanctions alert. Please take care not to send repeat alerts to the same editor within one year of the most recent alert for the same topic area. Additionally, discretionary sanctions alerts are bi-directional; when another editor sends you a discretionary sanctions alert, both they and you become aware of the topic area. There is no need to alert someone who has just alerted you. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 23:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• A per the ANI discussion, your edits are indistinguishable from trolling. I could quote WP:battleground and several other links, but in the end it doesn't matter. You aren't here to build an encyclopedia, so frankly, I don't care what you're here for. It's incompatible with our goals. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. I was an observer of his arguments and they were reasonables and well structured. How come you can indefinitely ban someone without not only discussing the ban and proving the ill intent/harm, but not even going through the minimal effort to explain how did his actions warrant such an extreme sanction? This is a very disgusting behavior that can only serve to create echo chambers of which must I presume you want to be master of? I want to know if there is an appeal procedure to expose this kind of tyrannical and puerile behavior. 96.20.197.194 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]