Archived discussions

'/archive01 < December 2009 Hello Sir,

For your kind info Air India operates a scheduled flight AI621 to Mumbai from Bangalore. I have flown in this very flight, so that is why I made the change. If u don't believe go to the Air India website itself. I also have a photo of an Air India flight at the Bangalore Airport. I took this photo when I was travelling to Hyderabad. SO sir kindly update yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek191288 (talk • contribs) 07:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I thought I was just helping the article. I didn't know that constituted vandalism. - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I see you archived! :-) Much better. Zaps93 (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• HA! yes I did... But i totally cheated and did a copy-paste job! Jasepl (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One user removed these flights from the articles and NWA.com still show the flights still operating but I have restored them. Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 22:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on it! Jasepl (talk) 04:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We got it fixed already. The user seemed to have found the flights on Flightaware already as DAL754/DAL782 and realized his mistake beacuse he thought the flight did not carry the DL code. But I would keep an eye just in case others continue to remove it. Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 04:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss whether or not Jet Blue provides service to Rutland, Vermont at Talk:Rutland Southern Vermont Regional Airport. --Jc3s5h (talk) 19:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "familarise myself?"ZHoover123 05:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZHoover123 (talk • contribs)

No I don't need English language lessons but thanks! Listen, everytime I write something on Wikipedia, I ALWAYS use four ~'s but I don't know why it always proceeds as unsigned? ZHoover123 05:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

The IP came to my talk page with this, so I have reported it here. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 19:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One user made this weird change to Delta at SGN. He added LAX as a destination but DL has no traffic rights from SGN to NRT without passenger originating to/from the US and it is DL302 SGN-NRT-LAX. However, I could not book SGN-NRT on NWA.com or on Delta.com; made a hidden note for it. But however, the flight has a plane change at Narita. Can you try and fix the hidden note or some sort or should we add Ho Chi Minh City as a destination (and also remove it from NRT page) for LAX since DL has no such traffic rights from NRT and SGN? Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 07:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the second part of your explanation is best, that we list LAX as a destination from SGN (on an exceptional basis, because we can't just leave out Delta altogether). We should also remove SGN from the Narita dest list. Jasepl (talk) 08:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tafa Air. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. kedadial 08:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jasepl. You have new messages at Kedadi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

kedadial 09:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Air India still flies to Bangalore. I even have the picture of an Air India flight scheduled to depart to mumbai at the Bangalore Airport. CHeck the Air India website itself. Try booking a flight from Bangalore to Mumbai or Singapore. If the particular flight is operated be Indian Airlines, then the code for the flight will be AI 9***. for example AI 9110 is IC 110, a flight operated by Indian Airlines with a code share agreement with Air India . But AI 621/ 620 are not operated by Indian Airlines and so is AI 444 / 445 Bangalore-Singapore-Bangalore. Also check the Bengaluru International Airport website if u are not clear. Bangalore is a destination of the AIR INDIA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek191288 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have checked the GDS and can only confirm that Dar Es Salaam, Kuala Lumpur, Lahore and Islamabad are being launched as they are bookable. Should we put airlineroute's source [1]in temporarily to avoid this accurate information being removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferminio (talk • contribs) 22:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is currently discussed on my talk page and at WP:Airports. Feel free to contribute. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: User:Kavs8 is currently re-reverting your edits. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are re-re-reverting. But this edit-warring is not a solution either. Do you have any idea how to solve this problem? Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - I only reverted the Thompson flights to Irish airports, because these are not scheduled charters, nor can one buy simply a seat on the flight. I explained that in the edit summary too. And gave Kavs (who's been a major headache in the past as well) a 3RR warning. I think the best way forward is to wait for others to contribute at the project talk page, and also suggest in the discussion that only scheduled charters (where one can buy only a seat instead of the whole package) should be listed. Let's make that part of the guidelines, after discussing with others. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lies book now at www.firstchoiceairways.co.uk bookable flights from Dublin, Cork, Shannon etc.. i will continue edit war as you have violated wikipedia policy. --Kavs8 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 18:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jasepl, i see that you joined the report on this edit war. I dare say that I am not familiar with such a report, especially I do not know which references for Kavs8's behavior to give. Can you assist me? Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• By the way, that link Kavs8 keeps touting as proof of the claim does show that a handful of flights are indeed bookable from Dublin and Cork. I checked out a couple and each one clearly stated “Operated by Monarch Airlines" or "Operated by Iberworld". And M-O-N-A-R-C-H does not equal T-H-O-M-P-S-O-N! Jasepl (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be picky, but It's spelt Thomson :) Sorry. By the way. I agree with Jasepl. Zaps93 (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is from albania, clearly will be reverting anything he wants, as north kosovo, be careful he is not allowed to, also check his ip, previously suspended many times no doubt, but his reverts make no sense, escpet silly explanations! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wajdada (talk • contribs) 01:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you created my user page without my knowledge. Do a Check User first and then accuse. i am complaining in the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents of your habits of falsely accusing other new users as sock puppets. (Rhp26 (talk) 17:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

While I don't echo what Wardark said here, I do sort of agree that you shouldn't continue to accuse of sockpuppetry if you aren't going to take it to SPI. If you do take it to SPI, please let me know. tedder (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just put that tag on there. And will take it up. Trust me, it will pass the quacks-like-a-duck test with flying colours (just like before). Thanks for the heads up, Jasepl (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the ANI should work as a WP:PLAXICO. tedder (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are making a fool of yourself (Rhp26 (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, SON OF A BITCH. I AM BACKKKKKK.........lolzzzzzzzzzz (Rhp26 (talk) 05:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

A quick question here, over the past couple of months I have noticed that a majority of the airport pages went from having divided airlines and destinations to a single table format. May I ask you why you changed all of these to that format? I would like to input that I dislike this new format as it's harder to read when it's not spread out. Also if your trying to find airlines that are in the same terminal it is now a pain to look through and find those. If you are like me who is into Flight Simulator the old format (divided by terminals) was very nice as it was easy to read and made life easier. I am not bashing you so please do not take this the wrong way, I am just trying to figure out why all of this was changed. --BTVB6Flyer (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. basically, the multiple table format was used before the code was developed which allowed for listing airlines, destinations and terminals (if needed) in a single column, in a standard format. There is a discussion at WP:Airports / WP:Airlines where it was determined that the single table way is what will be followed across airport articles. It might be in the talk archives of those articles by now. I'll try to look for it as well. Jasepl (talk) 04:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]