Hello, Inexpiable, and Welcome to Wikipedia! As you have just started editing, I hope you find the following selection of links helpful and that they provide you with some ideas for how to get the best out of Wikipedia. Happy editing! Fæ (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Guide for younger editors Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles Request departments How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Darrell Lunsford. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. I have userfied your recently deleted article to User:Inexpiable/Sandbox. You may find it helpful to raise it for for comment at WP:RFF. Fæ (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Nobody is doubting the truth of this, but an article should provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I think a police memorial website is hardly an objective source. Youtube is not acceptable as a reference, and in fact you should not have links to Youtube videos on wikipedia. That leaves the NY Times, which is fine as a reference, but there are two problems.

• Please see this policy.
• The newspaper article (and for that matter the memorial site) did not support everything in your article. If you are adding your own interpretation, that is OR

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made these changes. Some are MoS (times, marijuana isn't a proper noun), some pov — we can't know he was overwhelmed by the smell of marijuana, some factual — I don't think that even in Texas that the police can convict and imprison suspects without legal process. Look what I've done to the NY Times ref; using [url description] makes your refs look much more professional and easier to read than a bare url. Incidentally, why don't you give the murderers' names? If you're happy with the changes, then post it again, without Youtube, I won't delete it.Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Banned From Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.2.119 (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Banned From Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Put to sleep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! A belated Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site by creating Banned from Television. However, the section titled "Controversy" had to be removed, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Butch Laswell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airborne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Pasqualone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for adding categories to Murder of Joey Fischer and Murder of Mark Kilroy. I hope you enjoy the virtual coffee! MX (☎ • ✎) 16:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is a new category that I created. FYI, in case you know any articles that need it: [[Category:School shootings committed by adults]] Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 12:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I sincerely appreciate the well editing and referenced information you’ve given on the article, Murder of Blair Adams. If you can do me a favor, can you add a photo of Adams for the article, I would gladly appreciate it. Thanks. -ATJ Averagetennesseejoe (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that you were the main creator of the 1998 Cúa hostage crisis article, thank you for creating it! I started translating it into Spanish even though I planned to do it months ago. I'm leaving this message because two other hostage crisis happened in Venezuela in previous years: the San Roman Tragedy in 1995 and the Terrazas del Ávila kidnapping in 1996. The main differences between these situations is that in these first two the rescue operations failed, resulting in the deaths of the hostages. I'm planning to create the articles in Spanish and I would be pleased of also translating them into English, so I thought you might be interested in helping. Cheers! --Jamez42 (talk) 05:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed a couple of the 2018 additions you put in were 9/11 related, but the instructions at the head of the list suggest they belong not there but at Emergency workers killed in the September 11 attacks. Dorsetonian (talk) 12:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. You have new messages at Dorsetonian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Inexpiable, thanks for creating Claresholm highway massacre!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please correct the close paraphrasing in this article. It can be seen as the highlighted text shown by this tool

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel V. Jones, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KCBS and KCAL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. You have new messages at MartinezMD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent edits to The Jeremy Kyle Show have incorrect uses of tense; our Manual of Style states that Wikipedia articles are always written in present tense, unless they discuss subjects who are deceased, that no longer meaningfully exist, or events that have previously occurred. Articles discussing products or works are always written in present tense, even if they are discontinued, as the discontinuation of a product or work does not always mean that it no longer exists in any form.

For more information about writing articles in the correct tense, please see the relevant sections Manual of style and our guide to Writing better articles If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. (This applies to TV shows which still exist even if they're no longer been aired. See MOS:TVLEAD and Talk:The Jeremy Kyle Show#Stop changing lead from "is" to "was".) Thank you. – Hounder4 13:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Smoke Dawg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smoke Dawg. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TwinTurbo (talk) 17:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you added an entry to the List of fugitives from justice who are no longer sought. Do you think that you could add some more? You can find plenty here: Category:Fugitives. There are many entries who can be added and I just can't do it all by myself. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add William Walters to List of fugitives from justice who are no longer sought. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. You have new messages at MartinezMD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You made an edit to the List of offenders executed in the United States in 2020-article, reverting an edit that removed John Henry Ramirez from the "List of offenders scheduled to be executed in the United States in 2020"-section and changed the number of currently scheduled executions and the number of people whose executions had been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Here is a tweet about John Henry Ramirez's execution having been cancelled. Can that be used as a source? Heart of Destruction (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, shouldn't John Henry Ramirez be removed from the "2020"-section of the List of offenders scheduled to be executed in the United States-article and added to said article's "List of offenders previously scheduled to be executed"-section? Heart of Destruction (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inexpiable. You have new messages at MartinezMD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160815002647/http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/death_row/dr_info/hall.jpg for Orlando Cordelia Hall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.207.10 (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed that List of fugitives from justice who are no longer sought be deleted. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of offenders executed in the United States in 2021, is not ready for the mainsapce. When you feel it is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Formerly wanted fugitives and Category:Fugitives formerly wanted by Sri Lanka have been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of people with surname Lee

added links pointing to Dennis Lee, Don Lee, Daniel Lee, David Lee and Dorothy Lee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually i was just translating articles from an other wiki KoreanDragon (talk) 23:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The pages created contain the correct information with the correct sources coming directly from the International Federation (check my page contributions), of which there are also a number of additional sources added. Hence, I do not understand that it is immediately returned as a draft. The page contains sufficient and short information that can be refilled later. The page has been created with all due care, as well as all other pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evan6065 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend. I've been talk page stalking Idreeshussain123 since encountering his articles in the new pages queue. He's adding articles to mainspace again, such as 2021 Myanmar protests. I just cleaned up some of the damage he caused there. You may want to look at his talk page, he actually added a list of more articles he plans to make. It may be time for ANI. I think his edits are in good faith, but he has some CIR issues. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Inexpiable. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 05:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 04:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Anthony Sowell, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 03:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darryl, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Darryl Hill and Daryl Mitchell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So let me get this right, you've twice removed an edit from the list of Serial Killers, because the serial killer doesn't have his own wiki page, even though he is a serial killer?

"There is currently no Wikipedia page for that particular serial killer and there is no pending draft. The list is already reasonably long, if we started adding serial killers to the list without a Wikipedia page then the list would go on forever."

There are plenty of lists on Wikipedia which lists something that doesn't have it's own Wiki page. As for the length of the list, if it gets too big then why not make it into more than one page. I've not looked but I bet the person I added isn't back on the list which will make the list incomplete.

Smithy53 (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you think that you could help me add some entries to missing person's lists? I have my hands completely full with editing and could really use some help, and would be very thankful to get any help. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Worthington (surname)

added links pointing to Thomas Worthington, John Worthington, George Worthington and Fred Worthington

Palmer (surname)

added a link pointing to Eugene Palmer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out this article that is up for deletion William Edward Willoughby. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joseph Edward Duncan, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 23:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Frazier Glenn Miller Jr., which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this article in draftspace Draft:Sardar (upcoming film). Thanks for helping me in my last article Sulthan (2021 film), because of that I knew to follow the procedure. Thanks. Kirubar (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings sir, Few days ago I created Draft:Malaysia to Amnesia, which was rejected on two occasions. Now some reviewer approves and tagged notable Malaysia to Amnesia and moved it to mainspace. You can compare those two and give a better publishing. Thank you. Kirubar (talk) 08:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - thanks for the reminder on John Eldon Smith. You were right that it was in dire need up updating. I have updated his article; I would appreciate it if you let me know if there need to be any changes made. I also updated the article for capital punishment in Alaska. Also, if you know of any similar death penalty-related articles that I haven't found and listed on my profile, I would love to edit those as well. Thank you! Afddiary (talk) 11:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Inexpiable:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

• Rohittrix (talk · contribs)
  • $1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Do India’s largest financial newspapers don’t quality as “reliable sources”? I fail to understand if the reputed news sites are not considered to be reputed enough for Wikipedia?

Rohittrix (talk) 08:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into Billie's case now that you've mentioned it

Also thank you for linking/improving my articles, I'm a law student and one of my modules is centred around Wikipedia, I had never edited an article before so I really appreciate your tips. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandolawian (talk • contribs) 00:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freeman family murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pontiac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to have a look at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 1#Ella French where there has been a comment about the validity of most entries at List of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty in the United States, of which you have been a major recent contributor. Jay ^(Talk) 10:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Inexpiable,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Thanks so much for all your work related to crime articles. Your efforts are appreciated. Damien Linnane (talk) 22:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I want to apologize for that weird edit, I was counting from the Terre Haute list and added the 2 at ADX to the math and I got 43, unfortunately the other 2 I forgot to count were in the "Former Death Row" list which are currently awaiting a retrial (total of 3 inmates counting Dzhokhar Tsarnaev).

Thank you for helping me catch my mistake.

Thomasthedarkenguine (talk) 22:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't have an alibi! He has immediate family that agreed to testify he was home, which DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS his gf Analise"s testimony that he was on the south side. 2600:1007:B0D6:DD67:2C9B:ECFD:F890:DAA0 (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2600:1007:B0D6:DD67:2C9B:ECFD:F890:DAA0: Did I create the article? No. Take up your issues with the author or add it to the talk page of the article for discussion. Thank you. Inexpiable (talk) 12:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Can you help me add that fact that Henry Montgomery from Montgomery v. Louisiana was just paroled i am having trouble with the edit as it keeps getting reverted and as you just succesfully edited this page Payne v. Tennessee could you edit Montgomery v. Louisiana for me please?--Afjnsd (talk) 20:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inexpiable, just a quick FYI and I won't bother you again. This user is almost certainly a sockpuppet of Cadeken (talk · contribs), a prolific sock master who has edited similar pages with numerous sockpuppets. The editing pattern is identical. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken/Archive. They will deny it, as Cadeken socks always have. If they continue editing I'll make a report at WP:SPI. Sundayclose (talk) 20:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Hey thanks for alerting me. I'm aware of who he is and suspected it as well. I've read over the archive history and recognize some of the names on the list. Very annoying edits he's been making, especially the serial killer stuff which has already been confirmed as wrong and incorrect. Although, some of his edits have been genuine, even if they are poorly sourced and worded. I don't know what the policy is regarding sockpuppets making edits and if they should all be reverted even if some are technically correct. I think the best thing to do though is report him at SPI. He's clearly going to keep going based on his edit history, why he would bother to I have no idea, but he seems determined not to stop unfortunately. The Montgomery edit he wants me to make is genuine though so I don't really know what to do in regards to that. Are you happy for me to add the correct info in regards to that case and source and word it properly into the article? In the mean time I would report him at SPI so it's done with or else he'll keep on going and this back and forth editing will never end. Regards. Inexpiable (talk) 21:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just made an SPI report. Sundayclose (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Good stuff. I have updated the Montgomery page though in regards to the latest developments in that case with proper sources and formatting, otherwise I'm sure he'll just keep editing it on other accounts in the future. If the information is going to be added it may as well be done properly and reliably. Inexpiable (talk) 22:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Inexpiable, Thank you for your recent edits to Deaths in September 1996. The comment regarding this edit deserved a proper answer. That's why I opened a new topic on the talk page. I hope I explained the removed entries well and would welcome any comments. Regards Mill 1 (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to help with my new Samuel Cooper article, WRAL made an excellent compilation all of their articles about the case, including his defense team's and the prosecution's arguments.

https://www.wral.com/news/local/asset_gallery/7282521/

Lightiggy (talk) 00:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The categories for Robert Alton Harris label him a serial killer, but he's not present on the American serial killer list. Not sure if he should be labeled a serial killer or not. Lightiggy (talk) 16:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: Thanks. I've removed the categories from the page. He is definitely not a serial killer. Inexpiable (talk) 17:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have access to Newspapers.com, so can you help with Leroy Keith. I'm trying to cite the fates of his accomplices, Louis Johnson and 16-year-old Joseph Reinthaler. From what I can see in the previews, Louis Johnson was convicted of first degree murder in Ohio, but avoided execution after the jury in his case recommended mercy. Reinthaler was tried as a juvenile and sentenced to an indeterminate term in the Ohio Reform School. In addition, an Akron Beacon Journal page dated April 26, 1959, titled "Life Was Always Cheap To Keith" has what appears to be a much clearer version of the current image on his wiki page, so I'd greatly appreciate you replacing it with that, if you can.

Lightiggy (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: You need to send me the link if you want this done, I can't find it. Inexpiable (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: Found it: [1] Inexpiable (talk) 12:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article on serial killer Frederick Charles Wood says he tried to commit suicide the day before he was sentenced for the Lowman murder. could you find it for me, since you have a newspapers.com subscription?

The article is dated Friday, March 12, 1943, and the information is on page 9 of the Star-Gazette, located in Elmira, New York. Lightiggy (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: Done you can find it here: [2]. Inexpiable (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found a link with several unlisted serial killers. Anthony Joe LaRette, executed in 1995, confessed to over a dozen other murders.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/remember-these-notable-st-louis-area-serial-killers/collection_b73d74ac-2927-5c19-af89-1cfaa8919a0e.html#1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightiggy (talk • contribs) 02:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Glennon Engleman a serial killer? He had 5-7+ victims over a span of decades. Lightiggy (talk) 15:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is George Hassell a serial killer? He confessed to a 1917 quadruple murder of family members. Lightiggy (talk) 02:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my edit for Jaturun Siripongs? I added a source saying he had no last words. Did you not see it? Lightiggy (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provided clippings from newspapers.com from the Fort Worth Star Telegram on the sentencing of Lisa Rene's killers?. The article is dated September 22, 1996. It list the specific charges some of the men accepted guilty pleas for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightiggy (talk • contribs) 19:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: I'm afraid my subscription has now expired so I no longer have access to it. Consider signing up for a month if you plan on creating more articles or updating others. Inexpiable (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Charles Coleman be listed as a serial killer. It says "despite killing at least three people, he was never convicted of the murder of Seward's wife and his conviction for Lewis' murder was overturned." The implication I get from this text is that he definitely murdered three people, even if he was executed with only one murder conviction standing. So, shouldn't Coleman be considered a serial killer? Lightiggy (talk) 04:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: No because two of those kills were together. Serial killer definition is three or more murders at different times/locations. Unless you can find a source that specifically lists them as a serial killer that's the definition. Inexpiable (talk) 09:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What makes Beardslee different from John Ruthell Henry? Henry is listed as a serial killer, and he did almost the exact same thing as Beardslee: Commit a single murder, serve time for it, and then commit a double murder after being released. Lightiggy (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I'd say Indiana murderer Kevin Aaron Conner is a serial killer. I was considering writing an article for him, but decided not to. Conner killed three people on the same day in 1988, one of them in a different location. Shortly before his execution in 2005, Conner also confessed to killing a fellow death row inmate, Jerry Thompson, in 2002. Oddly enough, I believe Thompson himself is a suspected serial killer. He was convicted of murdering three people in 1991 over exactly one month, two at the same time. Using the definition you gave, Thompson isn't a confirmed serial killer, but it looks like he was also charged with murdering a couple later that year, but those murder charges were dropped.

Lightiggy (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I have to make one last request for a newspapers.com clipping about Lisa Rene. The page is from the Fort Worth Star Telegram and is dated September 10, 1996, on page 51. The caption reads "Judge decries 'heinous crime', but notes cooperation in plea agreement". The article is about the sentencing of Demetrius Hall, Holloway, and Beckley, and the judge's very harsh words for the trio, especially Beckley. In the previews, the judge told Beckley he deserved to be executed and that he likely would've gotten a death sentence had he not cooperated.

Lightiggy (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have access to newspapers.com, and I wanted to know if you could clip an image of Darnell Collins from https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/476508390/. I am making an article on him and my subscription to newspapers.com has expired.

Rexxx7777 (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you do an article on John Francis Roche? I'd do it myself, but I don't have newspapers.com access, and there are hardly any other sources. Lightiggy (talk) 01:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about Owen Feener? Owen "Mickey" Feener is a suspected Canadian serial killer. He is suspected of up to eight murders from the 1950s to 1960. At the time of his arrest, police found the photos of eight missing or dead women and girls on his car. Feener was convicted of murdering one of them, his girlfriend, K. Chouinor, sentenced to death, and hanged on June 13, 1961, at the age of 23. Newspapers reports at the time state shortly before his execution, Feener confessed to another murder, that of Dolly Woods, whose photo was also found on his car. Feener became one of the last men to be executed in Canada before capital punishment was abolished. This is all of the information I could find since I don't have a newspapers.com subscription, but it looks like Feener's daughter wrote a blog titled "The Man I Never Knew". I would appreciate if someone wrote an article about Feener. Lightiggy (talk) 00:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you remove the age of people involved in the event at the time? It makes reading and understanding relations so much easier because one doesn't need to reference each person's date of birth and do mental math every time the article mentions a specific date. Let alone the fact the paragraph talks about late teens/early adults, a serious distinction in court.

Also the young age of Patton's death is interesting (I couldn't find more information on the cause of death although admittedly I haven't dug deep and far enough). His date of birth is not mentioned in the article so one cannot even do the math.

It would make a lot of sense if you reverted your edit. 2604:3D08:7386:200:8CD5:FEAE:FC28:5554 (talk) 08:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because it really isn't needed. Furthermore, having ages in brackets is poor MOS. Talk to me on your main account in future please rather than hiding behind an ip. Inexpiable (talk) 15:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the new Malik Samartaney article, ignore the copyvio matches from r/TrueCrime. I am responsible for that post.

Lightiggy (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be far more cautious when accepting articles dealing with living people - specifically this draft which you accepted that is a msasive blp violation and violation of WP:V as well as WP:CRIME, not to mention full of WP:OR. CUPIDICAE💕 17:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to comment that I've already G7'd that article… I've lost confidence in creating articles… — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 18:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James W. Hutchins was initially CHARGED with murder. He was only convicted of manslaughter after claiming self-defense. Stop removing it. Literally all of it is sourced. That said, I've removed the parts saying he was a serial killer and added several more sources which talk about the 1954 killing.

Lightiggy (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: Now it is, it wasn't before though. You must source every sentence, which you did not do with the Wesley Ira Purkey page. Your edit here: [3] "The company which Purkey worked for, Reddi Root'r, later agreed to pay Bales's family $500,000 to settle a negligence lawsuit over their failure to perform a background check on him." You provided no source for such a claim which is why I reverted that as well. The source needs to be at the end of the sentence. And if it's used multiple times you need to give it a ref name and resource it throughout the article. Inexpiable (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added sources for Purkey, too Lightiggy (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightiggy: Good, interesting find. But please also start using wording like "who had", "he had", rather than who'd, he'd, etc. Only use apostrophe's when it's in quoted text. So please change this sentence and any others that also use this wording style: "Hutchins, who'd been hitchhiking while he was AWOL, killed Weibel after the driver picked him up in New Mexico." Inexpiable (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it for you: [4] but please be aware of this from now on. Inexpiable (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One more request, can you please clip this?

Rexxx7777 (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rexxx7777: Here: [5]

Inexpiable (talk) 07:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Great Reviewer Award
	Appreciate reviewing my article :) FlantasyFlan (talk) 23:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anatomy of Crime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just primary sources or YouTube uploads

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dustin Honken.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're changing wording in articles from words that ARE in the source, to words that AREN'T in the source. There is no possible justification for this that makes sense, and leaving some weird threatening message on my talk page isn't cover for that. Knock it off. And cease posting on my talk page. If you have a problem, go to the article talk page. Wes sideman (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wes sideman: You are refusing to gain consensus which is a vilation of Wikipedia policy. The talk page edits are from the Red warn program. Cease and decist or I'm reporting you. Inexpiable (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. The status quo on the article was "crack house" before TheXuitts changed it. In a dispute, go back to the status quo until the discussion is finished. Report all you want, it'll just boomerang on you because you're so clearly on the wrong here. Wes sideman (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No because he reverted your edit and I am reverting yours. You are violating WP:3RR Inexpiable (talk) 21:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wes sideman (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) Yes! I was hoping you were chasing the elusive boomerang on our MMORPG. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've also started a report regarding Inexpiable and Gabrielle103 being connected. Wes sideman (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wes sideman: Feel free to check the IP's. It will come back clean. I am not a sock puppeteer and to make such an accusation is extremely derogatory and you are merely trying to discredit me! I am based in the UK. Maybe you are just in the wrong and other users agree with me? I've edited for over 10 years with over 20,000 edits and made multiple articles. Do you really think I'm going to throw it all away over such a ridiculous argument? I honestly have no idea why you care so much about the words "drug" and "crack" it is actually laughable. But I have made my arguments over at the false report you made about me which proves you have been involved in an ongoing edit war with another user, NOT MYSELF, since 2020. You are the one clearly in the wrong here. Inexpiable (talk) 22:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They also opened a sockpuppet investigation about you here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Inexpiable if you want to make your arguments there too. Gabrielle103 (talk) 23:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]