Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hi I have started a discussion in the talk page for that (unnecessary) article for a speedy deletion request and feel free to join if you want. However I may just really delete and just merge it with main 2019 PTS article instead. Typhoon2013 (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Typhoon2013: That content has too many issues to be merged... the whole thing needs rewritten and sourced. Noah^Talk 10:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Category 1 Pacific hurricanes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hurricane Noah! Sorry I missed your PM. I definitely understand your thinking when it comes to the username you reported, Force thirteen. However, I also think that it's too ambiguous to rule it as a violation of Wikipedia's username policy and justify taking administrative action. However, if a user with a borderline or questionable username start causing disruption or adding vandalism to the project, such usernames can be factored into the decision to block the account sooner. Keep an eye on things, and please do not hesitate to let me know if the user starts causing disruption or other issues, and I'll be happy to look into the matter further. Thanks again for the message, and I wish you a great day and happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: Please see Force Thirteen... In this case, the user name looks as if it is impersonating the Force Thirteen company/organization. Noah^Talk 02:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Noah - Ohhhhh!!! I thought you believed the username to be a UPOL violation because it might be referring to.... never mind... LOL. You might be correct with your thoughts regarding the username of this account, but I don't see any edits that establish this to be true to a reasonable degree of certainty. We should watch the user and wait for them to make additional edits so that their username becomes more clear. If this happens, and the user's edits begin to demonstrate that their username is intended to represent that company, please let me know and I'll be happy to look into this further. Until we have a more clear idea of what the username intends to represent, we should default ourselves to the assumption of good faith until clear edits, logs, data, and evidence is found that clearly shows otherwise. ;-) Please don't hesitate to reach out to me if I can be of any assistance to you with anything else, and I'll be more than happy to help. :-) Thanks again for the message, and I apologize for being AFK when you reached out to me; otherwise I would've got back to right away. Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]