Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Capit (talk | contribs)
Capit (talk | contribs)
I resent the personal attack and public banner on my page from you
Line 62: Line 62:
Could you tell me what you are referring to? I attacked someone? Don't you think if you are going to accuse me of something you should tell me more specifically what it is? [[User:Capit|Capit]] 18:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Could you tell me what you are referring to? I attacked someone? Don't you think if you are going to accuse me of something you should tell me more specifically what it is? [[User:Capit|Capit]] 18:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Who are you anyway? This doesn't feel like a very friendly place, contrary to all those Wikipedia policies. [[User:Capit|Capit]] 18:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Who are you anyway? This doesn't feel like a very friendly place, contrary to all those Wikipedia policies. [[User:Capit|Capit]] 18:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

== I resent the personal attack and public banner on my page from you ==

Below is a copy of the message I sent to a person (I have no idea who he is) who removed the public banner you put on my page, calling me a derogatory name and making accusations. I don't know you either and why you should want to personally attack me and make accusations.

This is my talk page, and an ugly page it is:

===NPA===
Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks --> [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite|&laquo;<small>Talk</small>&raquo;]] 02:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

:Sockpuppets are banned users to try to login under a different name. At one point there was a users [[User:SirIsaacBrock]] who was very very bad, and annoyed a lot of people. I guess because of your comments on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School]] [[User:Hipocrite]] has reason to think you were a sockpuppet.

:Sorry that you've had a bad initial reaction. Things will go smoother if you read through some of the policy above, especially [[Wikipedia:Etiquette]].

:I'll remove the template, as you comment on [[Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)]] seems to indicate that your not a sockpuppet (sockpuppets generally know what a sockpuppet is). If you have other problems like this the best place to metion them is [[WP:ANB]] --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 19:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


'''My reply which I am keeping a record of due to the hostility around here:'''

First I am told that they are prejudiced against having information about high schools here -- which seems nasty right there.

Next I get a nasty note on my page from someone I do not know. Then I get a banner and I am told I am a sockpuppet by someone (not you). And now your are involved and I have no idea who you or the other persons even are.

I got involved with Wikipedia because I was told there was extreme hostitity toward high schools and that it was very necessary for me to vote to defend them. I can only believe that this is true and that my interest in high schools is the reason the guy called User:Hipocrite is attacking me and calling me a sockpuppet, which, I gather, is a slur and an ugly thing to accuss someone of -- not only accuse me but put a big banner on my personal page and publically label me.

This does not engender good feelings in me about Wikipedia and I am beginning to understand all the hostility that is around. [[User:Capit|Capit]] 19:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


::User was able to quote and link policy on their 6th edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kent-Meridian_High_School&diff=next&oldid=63842167], was using insider-terms on their 9th [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kent-Meridian_High_School&diff=prev&oldid=63846886], and knew about their user page on their 5th. Obviously a sock, I suspect SIB given that user becaume abusive following around editors who opposed SIB, but no need for a tag. If this incarnation of whichever user it is ceases all disruptive behavior, they will certainly be welcome here. If user insists on getting involved disruptively on a going forward basis, their tenure will be short. It's their call. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite|&laquo;<small>Talk</small>&raquo;]] 19:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:02, 22 July 2006

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/May06. Sections without timestamps are not archived

User talk:Hipocrite/devnul

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive1

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive2

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive3

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive4

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive5

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jun06


Please comment on plagiarism

Thanks. Here you go. ____G_o_o_d____

I noticed that you pout a suspected sockpuppet of SirIssacBrock notice on Capit's page. Any reason in particular? Metros232 17:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing comments

Moved to User talk:Hipocrite/devnul, complaining user blocked for harassment. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi there! Thanks for your encouraging words. It was nice to read supportive comments, and I'll be sure to remember them moving foward. Thanks again for everything :-) --HappyCamper 03:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

restoring a page blanking is not 3rr

kthxbye. SchmuckyTheCat 00:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: DU

Good find on the WEBCommentary link! - CheNuevara 14:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ED AfD

Please check out the new additions on the talk page. You've been asked there to comment on several options. rootology 15:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment requested

I asked this and you didn't answer. What do you think of this article about ED, wikifur's as compared to the various versions at wikipedia? Keep in mind ED bashes furries more than wikipedia. Hardvice 23:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for kind words and help with Dance Portal! Annaxt 14:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

another article heavily unsourced/failing

Just wanted to draw your attention to Uncyclopedia. I started to address problems with it on a couple edits, but your eye is more finely tuned for policy vio stuff than mine yet. Would you mind taking a swing at it? I will shortly do more when I have more time. rootology 01:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just got my message from you accusing me of personal attack....

Could you tell me what you are referring to? I attacked someone? Don't you think if you are going to accuse me of something you should tell me more specifically what it is? Capit 18:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) P.S. Who are you anyway? This doesn't feel like a very friendly place, contrary to all those Wikipedia policies. Capit 18:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I resent the personal attack and public banner on my page from you

Below is a copy of the message I sent to a person (I have no idea who he is) who removed the public banner you put on my page, calling me a derogatory name and making accusations. I don't know you either and why you should want to personally attack me and make accusations.

This is my talk page, and an ugly page it is:

NPA

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hipocrite - «Talk» 02:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets are banned users to try to login under a different name. At one point there was a users User:SirIsaacBrock who was very very bad, and annoyed a lot of people. I guess because of your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School User:Hipocrite has reason to think you were a sockpuppet.
Sorry that you've had a bad initial reaction. Things will go smoother if you read through some of the policy above, especially Wikipedia:Etiquette.
I'll remove the template, as you comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) seems to indicate that your not a sockpuppet (sockpuppets generally know what a sockpuppet is). If you have other problems like this the best place to metion them is WP:ANB --Salix alba (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


My reply which I am keeping a record of due to the hostility around here:

First I am told that they are prejudiced against having information about high schools here -- which seems nasty right there.

Next I get a nasty note on my page from someone I do not know. Then I get a banner and I am told I am a sockpuppet by someone (not you). And now your are involved and I have no idea who you or the other persons even are.

I got involved with Wikipedia because I was told there was extreme hostitity toward high schools and that it was very necessary for me to vote to defend them. I can only believe that this is true and that my interest in high schools is the reason the guy called User:Hipocrite is attacking me and calling me a sockpuppet, which, I gather, is a slur and an ugly thing to accuss someone of -- not only accuse me but put a big banner on my personal page and publically label me.

This does not engender good feelings in me about Wikipedia and I am beginning to understand all the hostility that is around. Capit 19:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


User was able to quote and link policy on their 6th edit [1], was using insider-terms on their 9th [2], and knew about their user page on their 5th. Obviously a sock, I suspect SIB given that user becaume abusive following around editors who opposed SIB, but no need for a tag. If this incarnation of whichever user it is ceases all disruptive behavior, they will certainly be welcome here. If user insists on getting involved disruptively on a going forward basis, their tenure will be short. It's their call. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply