You haven't edited United DUghters of the Confederacy before, yet you suddenly show up supporting an IP who was obviously about to be blocked. You don't edit any related pages that I can see. Why shouldn't we assume the IP is yours? You do know that some Administrators can check your Ip, don't you? I can. I'd really like a response. Note that I am also considering blocking you if you continue to ignore and just delete messages on this page. Doug Weller talk 20:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check my IP, I am in no way related to them. I found that article through recent changes. You are coming off incredibly hostile, i'm sorry if I have harmed you in some way. I'm not used to communicating on here so hopefully I am doing this correctly. HanotLo (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i'll take your word. I still don't understand why when 3 editors reverted the IP you restored it. You haven't harmed me, but rather or not you intended it you joined in an edit war. My attitude would have been otherwise had you not done that as well as not responded to the other messages you've received. Pardon my wording, the letter that is between e and g isn't working on my keyboard right now. Doug Weller talk 20:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm used to ignoring messages. I'm still getting used to editing here.HanotLo (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of military vehicles of World War II, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 21:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alfie, I'm not sure what you're talking about. I reverted vandalism by 210.55.186.173. I've had to revert their edits multiple times now, just look at the edit history of the List of military vehicles of World War II page HanotLo (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

God dammit, Twinkle. I deserve a trout for this one. My bad. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 21:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly urge you to slow down in your editing. Much of what you are doing is fine, but you are making a large number of mistakes, some of which have been mentioned to you in messages here, but I have found more in your editing history. To give just one example, assuming that this edit was not deliberate vandalism, it was the result of very hasty and careless editing. Slowing down a bit may result in slightly fewer good edits, but that small sacrifice will be more than made up for if you stop making bad edits because you are being too hasty to check your edits carefully. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JamesBWatson, thank you for your message and I will slow down my editing. Just so you know, that edit to the Uma Thurman article was deliberate vandalism. That was the first day I created my account and I was mainly screwing around, to be clear I haven't deliberately done that since. If there are any other mistakes you feel i'm making please don't hesitate to tell me. Thanks again, HanotLo (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]