Hi Haldir Marchwarden! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stjepan Mohorovičić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Croatia
Hi, Haldir Marchwarden, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Croatia! WikiProject Croatia is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Croatia and the Croats. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Croatia currently covers a total of 17,589 articles and 8,181 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

Daß Wölf 19:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you've written a nice article there! I've just made a few corrections for you: we mostly use British English for articles about Croatia, also interlanguage links shouldn't be directly used in the article text, use the {{ill}} template, like this: {{ill|Croatian page name here|hr}}. You should also consider nominating the articles you make for the Did you know section (although translations like this aren't eligible, the text must be new). Cheers, Daß Wölf 19:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wölf, thank you so much for your message and invitation! I will indeed check out the Croatian project. Best wishes.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 22:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Siqin Gaowa Homecoming.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the messages Whpq. I attempted a reply to keep at least File:Siqin Gaowa Homecoming.png. Shouldn't it be considered suitable for the infobox, maybe I can move it from the ib and incorporate it in the article.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 23:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would not meet WP:NFCC#8. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image -- Whpq (talk) 00:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to expand the article quite a bit, and I will treat Homecoming too. I should've expanded the article first... If the image is deleted before I finish, may I re upload it? And, anyway, is it possible to keep the image inside the infobox? Thanks.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 00:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the image must meet all of the non-free content criteria at the time it is used. The file won't be deleted for 2 days. -- Whpq (talk) 00:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, got it, thanks--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 09:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Siqin Gaowa.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Yan Huizhu opera singer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Mate Balota stamp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Požega City Theater, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969:, okay, I'll check it out and improve it asap.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 10:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Once you add the refs, you can ping me to take another look. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Okay, thanks =).--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Dear Onel, perhaps the Požega City Theater is good to go now.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haldir Marchwarden, looks good. Nice job. Have moved it to mainspace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Alright, thanks.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 12:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sino-Roman relations into China–Italy relations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa thanks for the message. I will now proceed to do as described for China-Italy relations. I might've done this in the past with some other article but I can't remember which...--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 16:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please refrain from making unfounded accusations against other editors. It's about this edit - diff. Content removal was adequately explained. Please, read the edit summary. --Renat 13:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry RenatUK, I wasn't aiming at your edit, but at the last edit which I reverted, the one removing content from the lead. I used the same justification for all edits simply to write something and get there; I also used the wrong word (which I later changed), because even that edit was explained, it just wasn't a valid justification in that case. Again, sorry for the misunderstanding.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 13:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Le Lettere logo svg.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Virgilio Giotti on Il Zibaldone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ruggero Rovan self portrait.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Haldir Marchwarden, thank you for your working on the new article Nökör. I've noticed that you followed one of the sources, the Brtiannica article, very closely. It's okay to quote briefly form sources but we should, in most circumstances, summarise sources in our own words. Best and happy editing, Modussiccandi (talk) 21:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Modussiccandi, thanks for the advice; okay, I will try and do it. Also thanks for editing the article for me.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robertsky. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more of your recent additions to the page Bai Shan because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do remember to source for the English titles in the Filmography table as well. – robertsky (talk) 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks; I'm going to translated it soon.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Haldir Marchwarden! One of the nice things about Wikipedia is that there's someone who likes doing almost anything. It took me a while to believe that there were actually people who enjoy correcting the spacing in reference formatting, but it is so! They probably find it odd that I enjoy the stuff I do, too. So if you just do the tasks you like, and others do the same, almost everything will get done. You are a volunteer, doing this for fun. That said, we help one another. Feel free to post to my talk page, if you run across anything where it might be helpful to you. HLHJ (talk) 04:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks for the gift.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 09:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. If you want to talk to me somewhere other than my talk page, ping and I'll see it. Good luck! HLHJ (talk) 00:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Luni Editrice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I created the page in good faith, but I understand that it might look that way (the company is not a major); I'm just a little bit sorry for the time lost, but if you want to delete it it's fine.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 08:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Luni Editrice logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Lesko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The One.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Il patto Mussolini Salata.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anna Lesko has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed Francesco Carrara (archaeologist). Thanks very much for creating this and I hope you continue to enjoy editing. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help you with anything. Mccapra (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra, thank you so much for the food, it looks delicious! Thank you also for reviewing this article and all the others in the past and for always helping with stuff. Let me know if you need help with anything! =)--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 23:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you contributed now a couple of articles that appear to have had some sort of a weird Italian nationalist slant in places, earlier Vincenzo Duplancich and now Francesco Carrara (archaeologist). It seems these are being translated, so it's not clear if the extraordinary statements are present in the source text or added by you. Assuming good faith, it's the former, but still, please make an effort to weed out the POV claptrap when working on this. Thanks! --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joy, thanks for your message. Like I mentioned in the edit summaries, those two articles were translated from wp:it. Everything was taken from there. Specifically, regarding Francesco Carrara's paragraph Nationality, I agree with what the Italian editor wrote, which is why I din't cut that part. On the other hand, I also agree with you, and I think the paragraph needed sources and perhaps some rewording. However, I would've used templates instead of removing it.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 23:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean it's quite clearly controversial, Duplancich's article currently references glaringly over-the-top rude statements from Tommaseo. Documenting this 19th century discourse is legit as such, but it should be done with modern-day secondary sources, as opposed to direct quotes, because parroting these views verbatim hardly contributes properly to the modern-day reader's understanding of these issues. Surely some Italian social scientists talked about these issues in the last century and a half?

This is especially so for the case of Carrara, where the cited source literally did not do this purported cultural appropriation - I did not proofread all of it but I searched through it for typical signs of nationalism, but couldn't find much - it just seems like a reasonably neutral literary text, with nearly a hundred references to a variety of Croatian and Italian sources. If you can't verify a reference because it's not written in a language you can read, yet it's supposed to confirm a claim that is obviously going to be contentious, please tag it accordingly yourself.

If you agree with what is written it has to be based on some facts, and citing these facts is not optional just because you're translating. English Wikipedia has policies on verifiability and sourcing that may well be less lax than what exists on the Italian one, and your translation here binds you to these rules, there is no exemption for any translations from other foreign-language Wikipedias. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joy For Duplancich: I agree Tommaseo's quote is outdated; it's fine if you want to delete it, as far as I'm concerned (I did not add it only to leave it unexplained by secondary-sources' text; rather, the quote itself was a means to make the reader better understand what stated by Treccani, that is to show how Tommaseo disagreed with the Voce dalmatica--He collaborated to the creation of the weekly La voce dalmatica, promoting collaboration between Italians and Croatians, which was criticized notably by Tommaseo). As for Carrara: I forgot to check those references, lost as I was in translating the article and solving other problems relating to translation. After all, it all seemed reasonable to me. It's true I kind of agree with what that paragraph state(d) in the sense that I think Carrara was of Italian nationality (though his mother, Katerina Korda, might've been Croatian), and that if it's true that "some Croatian scholars have tried to insert his work into Croatian culture," as the paragraph stated, than I would frown upon such wrongdoing and, if the thing has been covered to some extent, which I do not know, mention it in the article. Anyway, it's all beside the point because what you are saying is right, the bit needed more sources to be kept.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the quote certainly supports the claim Tommaseo disagreed :) but this is a great example where a secondary source would be preferable to the primary source.

The discussion on Carrara's ethnicity seems vaguely interesting to me, and I'd have no problem in examining it together with you, but history teaches me that if we just left it like it was, it would lead to pointless flamewars between anonymous editors with an axe to grind. As a community, we've lost an inordinate amount of volunteer time and effort trying to figure out how to make e.g. Roger Joseph Boscovich's biography not be a shitshow, and there's sadly many other examples. It's just better to be safe than sorry. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joy Like I said, for Tommaseo it's fine, and what you say makes sense. For Carrara, if the the content was not supported by the sources or they weren't reliable it was right to delete the bit. And I also get what you are saying. So Carrara's article is fine now to me too. As for the ethnicity: interestingly, the article at wp:it mentions a "Croatian Katarina Korda." However, she is not mentioned in the Italian Encyclopedia nor, apparently, in any source. Curious that wp:it reports this.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 20:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sulejman Vokshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dervish Pasha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work - well done. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Denisarona, thanks =) --Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Russian Cities Far and Near, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to be clearer on what the topic is, and avoid referring to things in "This article" that are not in the article. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 04:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:力 If by "this article" you refer to the sentence "This article lists the names of Russian cities, sometimes with brief mentions of the presence of stone", then "article" is a badly used synonym of "report", that is, the 14th-century list in the manuscript, not Wikipedia's article.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 09:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? I thought it was a translation of the ruwiki article, which goes on to have a list of Russian cities. The topic should be notable, but the article does need cleanup (ideally inline referencing for something, plus the bibliography shouldn't be in Cyrillic) before I will move it back to mainspace myself. Feel free to ping me directly if you want a review; you can also use WP:AFC but that sometimes takes over 3 months. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 20:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

La lista dei dalmati italiani in Dalmatian Italians è ordinata in ordine cronologico: nella spiegazione iniziale della sezione si legge in chronological order of birth come è giusto che sia. Tu hai elencato i personaggi sportivi in ordine alfabetico quindi t'invito a inserire due parole di spiegazione sempre nella frase iniziale della sezione o li riordini secondo la data di nascita come stavano prima. Puoi regolarti come meglio ritieni, ma chi legge deve capire il senso logico di quella lista appunto ordinata secondo un riferimento cronologico o alfabetico, che comunque bisogna spiegare. Apprezzo i tuoi contributi e articoli tradotti dalla versione in italiano nonché mi hanno divertito i commenti di un amministratore croato riguardo un supposto 'tono nazionalista' che proprio non esiste, almeno da parte tua, ma probabilmente esiste un POV nazionalista da parte sua! Io sono cittadino svizzero italofono e certe prese di posizione mi suscitano sempre ilarità. Ciao e ti auguro una divertente collaborazione senza trovare inutili polemiche in questa pagina.--Zipezap (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Zipezap, ti ringrazio per la notifica: errore mio, vado subito a ripristinare l'ordine corretto. Sono felice di sapere che apprezzi il mio lavoro! Per quanto mi riguarda, cerco sempre di rappresentare le cose in modo impersonale e oggettivo. Speriamo un giorno lo facciano tutti. Buona serata!--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 22:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gedik Ahmed Pasha, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After I first warned you that I would report you, you posted this on my talk page. Smart. Now you made me decide to post this on yours, and to report you. I reiterate that what you have to understand is that you cannot put fake claims in Wikipedia or delete sourced content just because you don't like it.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 15:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one who is trying to force a certain version. I have told you to engage in the talk page, yet you went straight-ahead to reinstate your problematic version, thinking that this would somehow stay as it is? Again, try and find consensus in the respective talk page. If you continue, the article will most likely be protected from further disruption. Demetrios1993 (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean "trying to force a certain version"? Maybe it's you who see things differently. Here I am only reporting what the sources say (with quotes), while you want to delete what the sources and the quotes say. My version is not problematic. It had a few repetitions which I removed. All the rest is supported by sources. Period. Deal with it. What is problematic is that you made claims of "Serb ethnicity" for this individual, and now you are constantly reverting any changes that disrupt the way you (not scholars) see things.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 FDW777 (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Haldir Marchwarden. You've been warned for edit warring on this article per a complaint at the noticeboard. You are risking a block if you change the article again without getting a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]