Admins: If one of my admin actions is clearly a mistake or is actively harming the encyclopaedia, please reverse it. Don't wait for me if I'm not around or the case is obvious.

This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.

This is the second attempt by InedibleHulk to recruit users to make edits on their behalf. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the belated response. I'm not sure it's worth getting hot under the collar about. It's possibly unwise but the edits are fairly trivial. Even if I were to lose sleep over it, I doubt any action would survive a community review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HJ, would you consider a warning? IH may not know this behavior is unwise. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please range block me under /16 range for three months.197.3.245.242 (talk) 04:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am sending this message on another device to request you to unblock my account for another.

Was hoping you could unblock my account of 2600:387:15:1416:0:0:0:5. You blocked me after I made an edit to a shark finning article a few months ago. The edit was of good faith, detailing how the U.S. just a passed a law to ban the practice, and I added sources. I have been following this topic for a few years now and have edited the page before. I am not sure of the reason for the block. I went on to make another edit with good-intentions today but saw the block.

I apologize if this is not the correct way to submit an unblock request. If you could point me in the right direction to do so it would be much apricated.

~~~~Editor of good-faith 2601:81:8402:3EF0:74EC:EF5C:6F53:2D7C (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for unbanning me.

2601:81:8402:3EF0:48D1:F2D5:F159:E202 (talk) 01:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]