Admins: If one of my admin actions is clearly a mistake or is actively harming the encyclopaedia, please reverse it. Don't wait for me if I'm not around or the case is obvious.

This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.

Tom TheNumbersmith (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

TomAllenProductions (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) - see contribs

22 March 2012

• (User creation log); 21:55 . . Tom TheNumbersmith (talk | contribs) created a user account ‎
• (User creation log); 22:01 . . Tom TheNumbersmith (talk | contribs) created a user account TomAllenProductions (talk | contribs) ‎

Is it just me who finds that a little odd? --Famously Sharp (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is odd, not least because that's not something I would expect an editor with six minutes' tenure to know how to do, but that's not to say there isn't a reasonable explanation. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the MediaWiki software logs that account x created account y if you go to the signup page (Special:UserLogin/signup) while logged in. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I'm wondering how a brand new editor would find that page without clicking "Log in/create account" (which would only display while logged out). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Over at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, we have been trying to figure out exactly how the vote that ArbCom called for should be carried out, in particular in a proposal to use Borda Count for the purpose. Upon requesting clarification from ArbCom in the matter, it was suggested that the closing admins be asked for their input, since after all it's you who'll have to read the results. So, if you would be kind as to, at your convenience, provide your input into the current voting format proposal, or suggest other measures, it would be a great help. Thanks! —chaos5023 (talk) 23:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

I don't suppose you (or one of your talk page stalkers) could block 86.40.64.30? It's an IP sock of the indefinitely blocked User:Brianwazere, which he acknowledges at Talk:Jill Marsden (EastEnders). - JuneGloom Talk 19:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Dreadstar ☥ 20:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dreadstar! I see he returned under another IP, so I suspect he'll be back again later. - JuneGloom Talk 20:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

I spotted your name in the list of editors willing to do copyediting. Bloody Thursday (2011) is not a biography, but it has a prose that needs fixing. Thanks in advance Mohamed CJ ^(talk) 09:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a word with AndresHerutJaim when you get a chance please ? They seem to have forgotten that a topic ban started after their block ended. See User_talk:AndresHerutJaim#February_2012 and their contributions today. Thanks. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]