Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Hello, Gråbergs Gråa Sång! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and the same to you! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just incase. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GGS - Many thanks for your warm Holiday Season greetings! And again for your (and WW's!) help this year. All the best to you for a productive, and enjoyable, New Year. Kind regards GG/BlackTeaBlackTea (talk) 00:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In space, no one can hear you carol. Ho! Ho! Ho!

Clarityfiend (talk) 06:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You too! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

God Jul och Gott Nytt år *Treker! Hmm, let me know if that ping worked. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It worked!★Trekker (talk) 13:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grabergs Graa Sang! I just wanted to say thanks for all you do around here, and especially for your help at BLPN. It's such an important policy, and I'm glad we have people like you around to help. I wish you a very happy holiday season, and may the coming year bring you great joy and good fortune. And, if you don't celebrate Christmas, then please take it as a Happy Hanukkah, a great Dhanu Sankranti, a blessed Hatsumode, a really good Saturday, or whatever holiday you want to insert there. Zaereth (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zaereth Thanks and a Merry Christmas to you too! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your friend Bishzilla and all her socks wish you a happy and healthy new Jurassic era! Bishonen | tålk 08:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

You too, socks! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

IIRC these won't archive unless there's a timestamp at the bottom. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you!! Yolanda T. Marshall (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it shows: the discussion fills me with actual pain. It's 2022: artists sing their songs, tell their stories, paint their visions, and all that's perceived is only the color of their skin (broadly sepaking). –Austronesier (talk) 20:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is too much of that, absolutely. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quiet2 (talk • contribs) 11:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] For WP:PRESS?--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 17:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ianmacm I guess you can argue that This set of pages lists any press coverage of Wikipedia that covers or discusses Wikipedia as a project – that is, any aspect of Wikipedia overall, such as its structure, success, information, goals, history – or views on Wikipedia in general, and so on. is covered here, since they do talk about structure of WP a bit. And Milton Keynes Citizen has a WP-article, sort of. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's interesting because the media coverage shows some problems with understanding WP:GNG. There has to be significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to make a standalone article. The latest draft is here and most of the sourcing seems OK, but there have been NOTNEWS and ONEEVENT concerns.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't remove it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grabergs Graa Sang (+three O's on top of the A's)! The English Wikipedia has been experimenting with some new tools for new editors, called the Wikipedia:Growth Team features, which you might be aware of from the Teahouse talk. One of these features is a mentorship program, where new users are given an experienced editor to whom they can ask questions directly. This feature is only given to 2% of new users currently, but this test subject will expand to most likely 80% in the near future. Since there are only about 50 users signed up to be mentors, this will be a tough workload for us, which is why I'm reaching out to some Teahouse regulars to see if they're interested. The questions you'd receive are nothing you haven't seen at the Teahouse and are relatively simple enough to answer (you can see examples on my talk page). If you're interested, you can sign up here. Panini!^🥪 13:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gråbergs Gråa Sång! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reply tool might get here soon, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any interest in moderating reddit.com/r/pitbulls? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tazdeviloo7 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tazdeviloo7: That's a weird and completely random thing to ask a Wikipedia editor. This CANVASS attempt over at Reddit [2] wouldn't have anything to do with your and Unbiased6969's sudden appearance in the Pit Bull article, would it? Pinging @Valjean: who is involved in the content dispute as well. Geogene (talk) 03:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I being mentioned in this trash? I see you are uninterested in arguing facts about pitbulls, but are more interested in making accusations and conspiracies, so why are you on Wikipedia? To harass people and prevent improvements on a page you are clearly biased for? Gråbergs Gråa Sång, not sure who you are, but sorry this garbage is on your talk page. The stalking that is going on ain't my thing, so I am out of this thread. How is this even a thing allowed on wikipedia? Now quit pinging me in this trash and let me know when you're actually ready to discuss the subject matter and not create drama. Jesus.Unbiased6969 (talk) 04:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]