Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Notification: proposed deletion of InfoInterActive. (TW)
Notification: proposed deletion of Usage analysis.
Line 72: Line 72:


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 05:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 05:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Usage analysis]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Usage analysis]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>Dictionary definition of a term that is just two words put together, not a [[term of art]].</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Usage analysis|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> &spades;[[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]]&spades; [[User_talk:Premeditated Chaos|(talk)]] 21:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:47, 19 December 2019

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... and ten years awesome today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... and ten years awesome once more! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments in local time

Hello, Gary! :)

I'm the only interface administrator in the Albanian Wikiquote and Wikipedia and I'm continuously on the look out for new gadgets to bring to our communities. Your script about comments in local time seems like a good gadget I'd like to implement to the whole projects. As I'm still new at the interface administration, can you help me by telling how can I do that? What exactly do I need to add at the Common.js page? Also, can you explain what exactly does the script do? I get that it calculates how much time has passed from the moment the comment was made until the current time (this was the reason I liked the gadget and wanted to implement it for the whole projects). Does it do anything more than that? I'm a bit confused about the whole "local time" thing. Do we still need to set the time zone at the Preferences? - Klein Muçi (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding how to setup a new gadget, you'll have to ask someone else for that, since I'm not an administrator here, so don't know how to do it. This script takes the timestamp that normally exists in signatures, which are in the UTC timezone, and converts it to a relative date, in the user's local timezone (based on their computer's settings, not their Wikipedia settings). Adapting the script to another Wikipedia will be difficult; you should find a programmer to do it for you, preferably someone that speaks your local language. This is because the script needs to be told the format of the timestamps in your local Wikipedia, so it knows what to look for and replace. This can be found in the code, in the regular expression after document.querySelector('.mw-parser-output'). Then the script can be localized in the LOCALIZING THIS SCRIPT section. Gary (talk · scripts) 20:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I tried copy-pasting the code and translating the "localizing this script" part but it didn't work. Even as a normal gadget like it does in EnWiki. Unfortunately I didn't know how to tell the script the format of timestamps used in our projects so I guess I'll leave it until I find someone who can help (if I can). Thank you for clarifying things up for me! :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 01:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've opened a GAR on the The Killers article for which you are a main contributor. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding sourcing and other issues. Following the guidelines at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment, I'm letting you know in case you're interested in helping to resolve the concerns, though you are under no obligation to do anything. See Talk:The Killers/GA1 for more details. SilkTork (talk) 05:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Note link

Template:Note link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article InfoInterActive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this company passes WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE doesn't show anything but mentions in passing/primary sources/press releases and like.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Usage analysis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition of a term that is just two words put together, not a term of art.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 21:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply