Article contributions (210) · Did you know? (108) · Good article reviews (232) · Barnstars (55) · Scripts (31)

Archives

2004 · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Wikipedia:April fools/April Fools' Day 2009/Requests for adminship/Juliancolton Alternative. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Wikipedia:April fools/April Fools' Day 2009/Requests for adminship/Juliancolton Alternative redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gary. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Facebook Ads. Since you had some involvement with the Facebook Ads redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

re special:diff/558210565 was there consensus to close the list? I don't think there's any harm in having an un-maintained list, and keeping it up is the best way to allow people to add to it. Wondering if you could restore. Ranze (talk) 16:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you can go ahead and restore it. Gary (talk · scripts) 17:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You contributed Pearl Jam discography into making it promoted the Featured List. The split proposal will affect its status as FL. Please join discussion. --George Ho (talk) 00:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was going through the undocumented-templates backlog and encountered {{Article and date}}, which you created. I looked at it for a bit and couldn't understand why it would be used, since it doesn't seem to have any transclusions. Could you explain the usage of this template to help get it out of the backlogged category? Thanks! Enterprisey (talk!) 03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I added docs now. The template is not really useful. Gary (talk · scripts) 15:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Enterprisey (talk!) 06:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]