Beginning to enter information you might be interested in regarding-1910-20 mens singles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Racingmanager (talk • contribs) 21:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, very good, very interesting. --Florentyna (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me about getting free photos of Sports. Sgxi (talk) 11:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is one of the biggest problems on wikipedia - to find free photos for articles. On the English wikipedia it is a little bit more easy, there you can upload small versions of nearly every picture under the fair use license to illustrate an article. Most images what I found are from flickr. For instance [1] has an adequate license for wikimedia commons (click on the page there on LICENSE) Probably all images from this photographer you can use for the commons. This image [2] for instance you can't use for the commons, because the license says: Noncommercial and No Derivative Works, but it must be both allowed. What is also allowed is to upload old pictures (author more than 70 years dead or pictures older than 70 years from unknown authors). If you have more questions feel free to ask. --Florentyna (talk) 12:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 18:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tell me such phrases but exactly what you mean. Florentyna (talk) 18:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i making some changes to your created template, hope you fine! --Aleenf1 12:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Florentyna (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few old ones (1967, 1969, 1970, 1971). First I have to locate them since I'm not very orderly and haven't used them in a while, and then my son (who lives 15 miles away) would have to help me with the rest since I'm terrible with computers. Please be patient and I'll see what I can do. Regards from one badminton lover to another. Badmintonhist (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've found three of the four books. One is coverless. I'll see if I can find the fourth one over the weekend. If you give me a mailing address I'll send you either the three or the four books within a few days. Don't worry about mailing costs, you'll pay your share when you send them back. Badmintonhist (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Florentyna. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I've declined your AIV request on User:Mvgcrown for two reasons. First you never warned, or in any way tried to discuss the matter with the user. Since WP:BLPCAT is a very technical rule, it's very likely that a new user wouldn't understand it. And we almost never block a user without explaining what they've done wrong, even in cases of blatant, aggressive vandalism. Furthermore, those edits are definitely not vandalism; the exact definition can be found in WP:VANDAL, but the basic idea is that vandalism only refers to edits designed to make Wikipedia worse, which clearly these are not. You may wish to review the vandal definitions on that page. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this is a little bit more tricky case, but also not good for the Wikipedia project. --Florentyna (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I agree with your sentiment as well. Since the user has continued, I've upgraded my informative statement to a warning. If the user persists, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page (I may not remember to check Mvgcrown's contributions) and I'll block. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Florentyna. I see you have added a badminton project tag to the sports club Østerbros Boldklub talk page, and wonder if you have a reference for Østerbros Boldklub having had badminton in its program?

I can see that an Østerbro BK is listed at the List of Danish National Badminton champions, but I think you have Østerbros Boldklub (Østerbros BK) confused with Østerbro Badmintonklub (Østerbro BK) - which in all honesty is a most understandable mix-up, as I made Østerbro BK a redirection article instead of just fixing the (commonly misspelled) link to Østerbros Boldklub at IFK Göteborg. Poulsen (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I must have a closer look on this, in the German WP it links to two badminton pages, but it can be assigned in a wrong way [3]. --Florentyna (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, in highlight section, that is heavily unsourced, please do not remove the templates. --Aleenf1 15:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]