Hello, With regards to the spacing of the Record Against Selected Opponents section I appreciate your mentioning that spacing depends on the display size. I tried a different solution, this time reducing the number of columns to three. Does this work better? --SargentIV (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This works! Regards, --Florentyna (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Florentyna, stop revert to old BWF profile link! As the old page is no longer supported by BWF. If not working with player ID, just change the link address or just defunct the link to BWF profile, two ways.--Aleenf1 11:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, that the new one is also not working correctly. The right BWF-ID will not work with the changed template. --Florentyna (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change it, like the one with Lee Chong Wei, search the new URL, copy and paste.--Aleenf1 11:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably not very good. The useful information BWF-ID will be lost during this process. --Florentyna (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Florentyna, I can't believe you removed this contribution! The fact that a badminton court is very large like a basketball court is information the world NEEDS to know!!! ;) rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really a (wrong) thing everybody has to know... ;-) --Florentyna (talk) 13:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need to panic; the article is now semi-protected, so IPs cannot edit it.  Chzz  ►  16:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rune Massing is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rune Massing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 18:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Category:Taiwanese badminton players from those who are also in Category:Olympic badminton players of Taiwan, since the latter is a subcategory of the former. I am therefore going to revert your re-additions, but if you have a convincing reason why this should not be done, please let me know. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because every olympic badminton player is sorted twice in Category:Olympic badminton players by country and also in Category:Badminton players by nationality. The matter with the olympic categories is, that the overview of the badminton players is getting lost. For me the olympic badminton players and commonwealth badminton players categories (and so on) are making not much sense. One can let the categories for people dealing often with olympic games, but for normal work the badminton player by country categories should contain all the players of a country including the olympic players in the root category. --Florentyna (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I looked through some olympic sportsmen categories (volleyball players, ice hockey palyers). Everywhere the players are listed both in the olympic category and in the national category. So I think we should let this double categorization like it is. --Florentyna (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that this is the right categorization scheme; essentially, it leaves the category redundant. I am not going to re-revert, but I am going to open an RfC on this. (No, there's nothing inappropriate that you did; it's just that this categorization scheme is in my opinion inappropriate, and I've been removing the redundant categories whenever I ran into them.) --Nlu (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like redundancies very much, too. But here you would have to re-organize all the entries in the Category:Olympic competitors by sport. And for it seems, that a lot of people are satisfied with the current situation. Especially if there will be mixed into the catgorization even more subcategories similar like the Category:Olympic competitors by sport (for instance competitors at Commonwealth games, World Championships, Asian Games...), the main country category will be more and more useless. --Florentyna (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make them useless; they're supercategories, which is what they're supposed to be. Basically, if we keep adding supercategories to article pages, the article pages will be so cluttered with categories that the categorization scheme will itself become useless. --Nlu (talk) 17:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i replied on the talk page. Kante4 (talk) 17:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I come from the same village as Flandy and my great-grandmother's last is also Limpele. We are not Chinese Indonesians, we're Indonesians. CakalangSantan (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your edit because you deleted a lot of other content in the article (medal tables etc.) --Florentyna (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Florentyna, since the information of retired badminton players were very limited in Chinese websites, I could confirm 4 of them only. Here they are:

de:Cheng Jiao 程姣

de:Dong Fang 董芳

de:He Shangquan 何尚全

de:Yu Yuk Geor 游玉娥

--Wongpong (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Florentyna,

I've just gone through and new page patrolled all your articles about the IBF and WBF World Championships, adding WikiProject Badminton banners to them all. If you intend to create lots of new articles in the future (about badminton or anything else), please ensure you put WikiProject banners on the talk pages. If you do this for all new articles, you can apply for Autopatrolled status and reduce the workload on New Page Patrollers. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sri Lankan National Badminton Championships has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Intoronto1125 (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It (the deletion template) is the wrong template - national championships are in general notable (see for instance: A national championship season at the top collegiate level is generally notable in Wikipedia:Notability (sports). And this championship is much higher than a collegiate one). The article is "only" incomplete, but it is the only information I got from the references. By the way, it is the first time at all, that these data are published in English in an electronic document. --Florentyna (talk) 16:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]