Hello, With regards to the spacing of the Record Against Selected Opponents section I appreciate your mentioning that spacing depends on the display size. I tried a different solution, this time reducing the number of columns to three. Does this work better? --SargentIV (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This works! Regards, --Florentyna (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Florentyna, stop revert to old BWF profile link! As the old page is no longer supported by BWF. If not working with player ID, just change the link address or just defunct the link to BWF profile, two ways.--Aleenf1 11:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, that the new one is also not working correctly. The right BWF-ID will not work with the changed template. --Florentyna (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change it, like the one with Lee Chong Wei, search the new URL, copy and paste.--Aleenf1 11:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably not very good. The useful information BWF-ID will be lost during this process. --Florentyna (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Florentyna, I can't believe you removed this contribution! The fact that a badminton court is very large like a basketball court is information the world NEEDS to know!!! ;) rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really a (wrong) thing everybody has to know... ;-) --Florentyna (talk) 13:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need to panic; the article is now semi-protected, so IPs cannot edit it.  Chzz  ►  16:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rune Massing is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rune Massing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 18:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Category:Taiwanese badminton players from those who are also in Category:Olympic badminton players of Taiwan, since the latter is a subcategory of the former. I am therefore going to revert your re-additions, but if you have a convincing reason why this should not be done, please let me know. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because every olympic badminton player is sorted twice in Category:Olympic badminton players by country and also in Category:Badminton players by nationality. The matter with the olympic categories is, that the overview of the badminton players is getting lost. For me the olympic badminton players and commonwealth badminton players categories (and so on) are making not much sense. One can let the categories for people dealing often with olympic games, but for normal work the badminton player by country categories should contain all the players of a country including the olympic players in the root category. --Florentyna (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I looked through some olympic sportsmen categories (volleyball players, ice hockey palyers). Everywhere the players are listed both in the olympic category and in the national category. So I think we should let this double categorization like it is. --Florentyna (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]