All England Championships information gained from Times Online newspapers, will eventually list all results of the tournaments including most rounds but some results are missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Racingmanager (talk • contribs) 23:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have adddressed the concerns at Template:Did you know nominations/Victoria Na. Can you please re-review the article? --LauraHale (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Florentyna. I removed the info from Reiko Shiota for two specific reasons. First, the sentence in the lead is a direct violation of WP:NPOV; it could only be added if clearly attributed to a reliable source. I removed the match record for two reasons: first, we generally don't provide match records for players--only their overall tournament results. Second, that record was basically useless, because it only represented a randomly chosen portion of her matches, and didn't even say when/where those matches occurred. Instead, we need to add her overall tournament record, and it needs to be verified by reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The highest levels of international cricket are Test, One Day International and Twenty20 International. Youth One Day Internationals are "One Day Internationals" in name only - they actually have no such status attached to them, nor do they have the "lesser" status of List A matches. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• For me from CRINT is played at the highest international and domestic level the reason for keeping. --Florentyna (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but it isn't the highest international level, as explained above. See also ICC Classification of Official Cricket under the section "ONE DAY INTERNATIONALS (ODI)". Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 20:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly the problem. A not explained mass removal of a protection template, what I reverted. Due to this, the articles are not more categorized in the correct way. --Florentyna (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you submitted a move request directly on the Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions page. Because the request was not posted at talk:Gurusai Datt, I have removed it and copied it here. Please resubmit your request using the procedure documented at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. While a bot normally will automatically post requests to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions, that bot has gone out of service and a replacement bot is still in development. Your request should be manually updated to that page, but if you wish to expedite that process, feel free to post your request there as well, using the date and time of the request at talk:Gurusai Datt. Thank you, Wbm1058 (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) - Gurusai Datt → R. M. V. Gurusaidutt More common name, R. M. V. Gurusaidutt: 21,600 Google hits, Gurusai Datt 4,060 Google hits --Florentyna (talk) 10:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]