Okeyes (WMF) (talk | contribs) AFT5 deployment notice |
Notification: listing of Category:SaarLorLux Open at WP:Categories for discussion. Tag: Twinkle |
||
(253 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
||
==All England== |
|||
Beginning to enter information you might be interested in regarding-1910-20 mens singles <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Racingmanager|Racingmanager]] ([[User talk:Racingmanager|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Racingmanager|contribs]]) 21:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: Yes, very good, very interesting. --[[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 05:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 == |
|||
==Images== |
|||
Please help me about getting free photos of Sports. [[User:Sgxi|Sgxi]] ([[User talk:Sgxi|talk]]) 11:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
: Yes, that is one of the biggest problems on wikipedia - to find free photos for articles. On the English wikipedia it is a little bit more easy, there you can upload small versions of nearly every picture under the fair use license to illustrate an article. Most images what I found are from flickr. For instance [http://www.flickr.com/photos/41377219@N02/7692537460] has an adequate license for wikimedia commons (click on the page there on LICENSE) Probably all images from this photographer you can use for the commons. This image [http://www.flickr.com/photos/gasi/2334286158/|here] for instance you can't use for the commons, because the license says: ''Noncommercial'' and ''No Derivative Works'', but it must be both allowed. What is also allowed is to upload old pictures (author more than 70 years dead or pictures older than 70 years from unknown authors). If you have more questions feel free to ask. --[[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 12:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> |
|||
== Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved! == |
|||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per [[H:DL]], causes errors for screen readers --> |
|||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; |
|||
|} |
|||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, |
|||
{| style="float: right; |
|||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" |
|||
|} |
|||
[[File:NPP unreviewed article statistics as of April 2, 2024.svg|thumb|400px|New Page Review queue January to March 2024]] |
|||
'''Backlog update:''' The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to {{no ping|Schminnte}}, who led with over 2,300 points. |
|||
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. |
|||
* The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username. |
|||
* To activate your account: 1) Go to [http://www.highbeam.com/prof1 http://www.highbeam.com/prof1] |
|||
* If you need assistance, email or ask [[User:Ocaasi]]. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration. |
|||
* A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at [[WP:HighBeam/Citations]]. |
|||
* HighBeam would love to hear feedback at [[WP:HighBeam/Experiences]] |
|||
* Show off your HighBeam access by placing <nowiki>{{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}}</nowiki> on your userpage |
|||
* When the 1-year period is up, check [[WP:HighBeam/Applications|applications page]] to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be. |
|||
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] 15:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0338 --> |
|||
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive. |
|||
== Your free 1-year [[WP:Questia|Questia online library]] account is approved ready == |
|||
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Next backlog drive|May backlog drive planning discussion]]. |
|||
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! |
|||
# Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer |
|||
# Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive). |
|||
# Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it). |
|||
# You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year). |
|||
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at ''wikiocaasi@yahoo.com'' and, second, email ''QuestiaHelp@cengage.com'' along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). |
|||
* A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at [[WP:Questia/Citations]]. |
|||
* Questia would love to hear feedback at [[WP:Questia/Experiences]] |
|||
* Show off your Questia access by placing <nowiki>{{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}}</nowiki> on your userpage |
|||
* When the 1-year period is up, check the [[WP:Questia|applications page]] to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be. |
|||
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 05:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0358 --> |
|||
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated! |
|||
== September 2012 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Florentyna|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Please make sure to include an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:Armbrust|Armbrust, B.Ed.]] <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|WrestleMania XXVIII]]</font></sup><sub> <font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|The Undertaker 20–0]]</font></sub> 18:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
'''2023 Awards''' |
|||
: Please don't tell me such phrases but exactly what you mean. [[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 18:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|74px|left]] |
|||
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Hey man im josh}} led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards|Awards page]] and the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards#NPP Hall of Fame|Hall of Fame]]. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing! |
|||
'''WMF work on PageTriage:''' The [[:mw:Moderator Tools|WMF Moderator Tools team]] and volunteer software developers [[gerrit:c/mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage/+/966286|deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October]], and then [[gerrit:c/mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage/+/967661|gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November]]. This concludes most major work to [[Special:NewPagesFeed]], and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/2023 Moderator Tools project#October 20, 2023: Final update!|wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October]]. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits. |
|||
== All England == |
|||
'''Recruitment:''' A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited. |
|||
Sorry, i making some changes to your created template, hope you fine! --[[User:Aleenf1|Aleen]][[User talk:Aleenf1|<font color="black">f</font><font color="red">1</font>]] 12:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
'''Reviewing tip:''' Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated [https://nppbrowser.toolforge.org/ NPP Browser] tool. |
|||
: No problem. --[[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 12:49, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
==IBF Handbooks== |
|||
'''Reminders:''' |
|||
I have a few old ones (1967, 1969, 1970, 1971). First I have to locate them since I'm not very orderly and haven't used them in a while, and then my son (who lives 15 miles away) would have to help me with the rest since I'm terrible with computers. Please be patient and I'll see what I can do. Regards from one badminton lover to another. [[User:Badmintonhist|Badmintonhist]] ([[User talk:Badmintonhist|talk]]) 20:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* You can access live chat with patrollers on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Pages Patrol Discord]. |
|||
* Consider adding [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist. |
|||
* To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]]. |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
:I've found three of the four books. One is coverless. I'll see if I can find the fourth one over the weekend. If you give me a mailing address I'll send you either the three or the four books within a few days. Don't worry about mailing costs, you'll pay your share when you send them back. [[User:Badmintonhist|Badmintonhist]] ([[User talk:Badmintonhist|talk]]) 05:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1216676254 --> |
|||
== New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive == |
|||
{{YGM}} |
|||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" |
|||
== AIV request declined == |
|||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''[[Wikipedia:New Page Patrol|New Page Patrol]] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span> |
|||
|rowspan=3|[[File:NPP Barnstar.png|right|80px]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
* On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. |
|||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. |
|||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. |
|||
* Each review will earn 1 point. |
|||
* Interested in taking part? '''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2024/Participants|Sign up here]]'''. |
|||
|- |
|||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]] |
|||
|} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 --> |
|||
==[[:Category:SaarLorLux Open]] has been nominated for renaming== |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>[[:Category:SaarLorLux Open]] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 11#Category:SaarLorLux Open|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Solidest|Solidest]] ([[User talk:Solidest|talk]]) 14:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I've declined your AIV request on [[User:Mvgcrown]] for two reasons. First you never warned, or in any way tried to discuss the matter with the user. Since [[WP:BLPCAT]] is a very technical rule, it's very likely that a new user wouldn't understand it. And we almost never block a user without explaining what they've done wrong, even in cases of blatant, aggressive vandalism. Furthermore, those edits are definitely not vandalism; the exact definition can be found in [[WP:VANDAL]], but the basic idea is that vandalism only refers to edits designed to make Wikipedia worse, which clearly these are not. You may wish to review the vandal definitions on that page. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 07:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
: I agree, this is a little bit more tricky case, but also not good for the Wikipedia project. --[[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 11:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::And I agree with your sentiment as well. Since the user has continued, I've upgraded my informative statement to a warning. If the user persists, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page (I may not remember to check Mvgcrown's contributions) and I'll block. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 22:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Østerbros Boldklub]] == |
|||
Hello Florentyna. I see you have added a badminton project tag to the sports club Østerbros Boldklub talk page, and wonder if you have a reference for Østerbros Boldklub having had badminton in its program? |
|||
I can see that an Østerbro BK is listed at the [[List of Danish National Badminton champions]], but I think you have Østerbros Boldklub (Østerbros BK) confused with Østerbro Badmintonklub ([http://www.badminton.dk/DBF/Klub/Info/?clubid=1133 Østerbro BK]) - which in all honesty is a most understandable mix-up, as I made [[Østerbro BK]] a redirection article instead of just fixing the (commonly misspelled) link to Østerbros Boldklub at [[IFK Göteborg]]. [[User:Poulsen|Poulsen]] ([[User talk:Poulsen|talk]]) 21:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
: I must have a closer look on this, in the German WP it links to two badminton pages, but it can be assigned in a wrong way [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Linkliste/%C3%98sterbros_Boldklub]. --[[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Lee Chong Wei career statistics == |
|||
Sorry, in highlight section, that is heavily unsourced, please do not remove the templates. --[[User:Aleenf1|Aleen]][[User talk:Aleenf1|<font color="black">f</font><font color="red">1</font>]] 15:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== New Super Series format == |
|||
I noticed that [[User:The tampan]] used a new format for the 2013 All-England Super Series Premier, but has gone further to using his new format for the [[2013 Korea Open Super Series Premier]] and is in the process of changing the formatting for the [[2013 Malaysia Super Series]]. I've been away for a while, have these changes been discussed, it's one thing to use a new format for a new competition, but to go back and change formats for completed events seems drastic. What are your thoughts?--[[User:MorrisIV|MorrisIV]] ([[User talk:MorrisIV|talk]]) 04:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:The tampan is still re-editing articles without providing an explanation for why he wants the new format. Personally, I think The tampan's edits have reached the point of wrecklessness. What options do we have to address this issue? I went to the [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Badminton]] page, but there is no comprehensive list of users so that a consensus could be reached. What do you think should be the next move?--[[User:MorrisIV|MorrisIV]] ([[User talk:MorrisIV|talk]]) 15:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::This is getting out-of-control, and frankly unacceptable. I think The tampan is claiming [[Wikipedia:Ownership of articles]] and is not responding to the discussion I attempted to begin on his/her talk page (which I find particularly egregious). I think we should go to [[User:Qwyrxian]] or someone else to resolve this issue.--[[User:MorrisIV|MorrisIV]] ([[User talk:MorrisIV|talk]]) 04:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Reach for consensus == |
|||
Since you are a listed member at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Badminton]] I am inviting you to reach a consensus at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Badminton]] regarding the format of brackets for tournaments, particularly the Super Series competitions.--[[User:MorrisIV|MorrisIV]] ([[User talk:MorrisIV|talk]]) 15:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:We just hae a debate on [[User talk:Drmies]] about the flag issues. Will the flag we practice currently object to the [[WP:MOSFLAG]]? |
|||
:: Right now I read this debate. I'm against the removal of flags. [[User:Florentyna|Florentyna]] ([[User talk:Florentyna#top|talk]]) 16:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::: Sincerely, I'm also not familiar with a list without flags, like misses a piece of information. --[[User:Aleenf1|Aleen]][[User talk:Aleenf1|<font color="black">f</font><font color="red">1</font>]] 16:29, 11 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Florentyna, you should read [[MOS:FLAG]] first before you simply revert, without a word of explanation: it's disruptive. The burden is on editors wanting to use those icons, and "I'm against" sounds like a matter of taste, not an argument based on policy or guideline. MorrisIV has arguments: as long as you don't have any, please refrain from reverting. BTW, what ''on earth'' is gained by having a flag in every single bracket? You should read the discussion on [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons]] for a variety of technical and other problems you probably never thought of, like how this works for the color blind or those without high-quality monitors. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Florentyna, your edit is obviously based on a misreading of MOS:FLAG; as I suggested to you earlier, your line, "flags should indicate the sportsperson's representative nationality", does not reflect the MOS: there is ''nothing'' in the MOS that says that flags should be used. I'll accept your good faith, thinking that this is a language problem. I am going to revert you one more time, and urge you to actually partake in a discussion, for instance in your WikiProject. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Article Feedback deployment== |
|||
Hey Florentyna; I'm dropping you this note because you've used [[WP:AFT5|the article feedback tool]] in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, [[User:Okeyes (WMF)|Okeyes (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Okeyes (WMF)|talk]]) 00:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:37, 11 June 2024
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
[edit]Hello Florentyna,
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/NPP_unreviewed_article_statistics_as_of_April_2%2C_2024.svg/400px-NPP_unreviewed_article_statistics_as_of_April_2%2C_2024.svg.png)
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/New_page_reviewer_of_the_year_cup.svg/74px-New_page_reviewer_of_the_year_cup.svg.png)
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:SaarLorLux Open has been nominated for renaming
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:SaarLorLux Open has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Solidest (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)