...for helping to solve a seemingly never-ending dispute on Talk:Yom Kippur War, for keeping the discussion soultion-orientated all the way, and for being really nice to work with :) Cheers! --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Revolution of 2013, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Freedom and Justice Party and Ahmed Maher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013–14 Tunisian protests → I hope this answers your question about the current events in Tunisia. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I, unintentionally, did not see while I was writing the inter-wiki references for the protests in Turkey.

And I guess that you have been reading all the statements there so you may have seen that I also wrote I would not aim to throw any stone to any wing and to any wiki user.

Therefore, I assume you did not misunderstand me. --Toksoz (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil–Egypt relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Would you mind keeping an eye on that article? User:Ersroitasent keeps breaking the 1RR and seems unwilling to discuss, and although I don't care much about reporting him, I would like the article to look decent. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, i can take a look on how it is developing from time to time. As for this user, i have checked his talk page and it appears he was warned before. So do you think i should give him another warning or should i simply report him? I don't really know how to deal with similar behavior since and i don't want to engage myself in an edit war either. Thoughts? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know. I very rarely bother to report or warn trolls, even though I probably should in some instances. By the way, thanks for stepping in. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mass Surveillance Dear, Fitzcarmalan. We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Mass surveillance, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to the privacy and global surveillance. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage. -- HectorMoffet (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcut WP:SETEC

Thanks for uploading File:Adly Mansour and Catherine Ashton in Cairo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't you see this? Wasn't that the license given? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mostafa Mahmoud march heading to Tahrir Square II.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mostafa Mahmoud march heading to Tahrir Square.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 18:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Revolution of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolution of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.GreyShark (dibra) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fitzcarmalan, I'm sorry for replying so late. I'm very busy in the outside world and sometime go on & off in Wikipedia. I've been willing to nominate for a name change of the article. But I haven't had the time to even check the article for progress. I'll see what can I do, in a convenient time. Thank you

P.S. I saw your user page and I liked it a lot :) --Universal Life (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries i can understand that. And thanks, appreciate it :) Fitzcarmalan (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for deletion the entry by mistake, I found my comment was duplicated, so unintentionally I erased it with the previous comment , I just fixed this mistake and thank you for the note.--Ibrahim.ID »» 05:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Coup of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think the contribution you make to wikipedia is biased and you are working for Egyptian government. I am totally against your views that are not of a neutral person. So I don't care if you revert my changes but I will continue to do so and make the things correct and neutral. Qjahid (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are making disruptive editing to wikipedia and the contribution are disruptive, please try to have consensus before you make things final and your wrong contribution may led to being blocked from editing. An example of it could be August 2013 Cairo sit-ins dispersal which should in reality be August 2013 Rabaa Massacre Qjahid (talk) 03:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Slashed personal attack and threats by a blocked sockpuppet. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Revolution of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasde dont threaten, it wont help you/ . Ive already mentioned its POV because of the title there that is in dsicssuin(Lihaas (talk) 19:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

When did i ever threaten you? I have nothing to threaten anyone with but you're the one who ignored all the discussions and since when does a title make a whole article POV. And also, why is the title POV? You never never gave any good reason because all you say is "POV fork". I was simply asking you to give a clear understandable argument, so don't try to make me look like the bad guy here. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Egyptian Revolution of 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sanaa

List of revolutions and rebellions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ennahda

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] --Panam2014 (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Ok. I will contact admin for vandalism --Panam2014 (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are being disruptive. The RM was to change the title only, not content inside the article. Please don't edit war. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You will blocked not me --Panam2014 (talk) 20:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Aswan tribal clashes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohamed Ibrahim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Can you help me to traduce the English article Ukrainian revolution of 2014 ? [2] --Panam2014 (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, i can help, but i don't think i'm allowed to translate an article with a similar shape. The orange tag needs to go and the disputes have to be resolved first so that it qualifies to be translated, i guess. I'm working on Habib Bourguiba and maybe soon on Muhammad Ali of Egypt because both are good quality articles. As soon as the problems are solved i will be glad to help. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Ukraine. Can you help me in this article of Ukraine between 1991 and 1996 ? --Panam2014 (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You mean translating it from French to English, right? If so, can you kindly ask an editor you know on the French Wikipedia if i'm allowed to do so? I just want to make sure there is a green light and that i'm not breaking any rules. Thank you. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I ask. There is no need for authorization. You just say that the article was translated from French. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done but please add more references. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. I noticed this article pop up on my watchlist, and I'd like to continue the discussion of this article there. In short, there never was any "Republic of Ukraine." The declaration of independence of Ukraine named the state "Ukraine," and the interim constitution was that of the Ukrainian SSR of 1978 (which was subsequently modified, but the state was named "Ukraine"[3]) I see no need as for why this article would even need to exist. I suggest redirecting it back to where it was. § DDima 03:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DDima: - Hello and thank you for your message. As you can see, I didn't feel comfortable about doing this in the beginning and i'm not very familiar with the subject at hand. However, I believe now that it is valid in a certain way. If you feel otherwise, please consider inviting more editors to comment on this before making any decision like redirecting or opening an AfD discussion. Regards. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you translate this article ? [4] Thanks --Panam2014 (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Habib Bourguiba, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Monastir and Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Tokyogirl79's talk page.
Message added 04:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

As a result of a community decision, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War. These sanctions are described at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:

• Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
• If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban.
• A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listed here.
• Please familiarise yourself with the full decision at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War.
• Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.

Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to . Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Donbass People's Militia, you may be blocked from editing. Please refrain from edit warring with other users and be aware of WP:3RR Львівське (говорити) 15:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lvivske: - You should certainly expect to have some of your edits challenged, especially when they are undue like this. So before you decide to "warn" me, please refer to discussing this on the article's talk page instead. And do tell me, when exactly did I violate the 3RR? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you were engaged in edit warring, it was simply a notice to be aware. --Львівське (говорити) 00:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the discussion at Template talk:Campaignbox 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. I think my argument about including Odessa in the campaignbox is appropriate. EkoGraf (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Can you create the articles in french wikipedia ? Thank you Fitz. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: - I will be very busy in the coming weeks and i'm just a few days away from my exams, so I don't think I will be doing any translation soon. However, I will take a look once i'm done. Can you specify which article(s) you want me to translate? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Kramatorsk clashes your opinion here would be appreciated. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@EkoGraf: - I have to check both articles first to see whether there really is content forking or not. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forking there is. But that's because I used the material from those articles for this one and wanted to cut down those other articles so there wouldn't be any forking. But before I could do that, that editor started the ruckus of deletion and forking. So I clearly stated on the discussion page that I will hold of on cutting down those other articles until the issue is resolved. If other editors want to keep the article than I will cut down those other articles and there won't be any forking. EkoGraf (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your position, but I think it should have been discussed on Talk:2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine before making the decision. As you can see, it is a very sensitive topic at the moment and is top in the news, so splitting or forking content should be proposed there first, I think. I'm still not sure if it merits a stand alone article, because although I agree with SkoraPobeda over there about the necessity of sub-articles, i'm still tending to consider RGloucester's point that the events in the article might not be directly linked. Give me 24 hrs so I can closely check the articles and I will gladly give you my feedback there. Regards. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems we may be coming to an agreement thanks to Arbutus the tree, check out the talk. EkoGraf (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided at the talk page sources showing the pro-Russians were armed, as well as the pro-Kiev guys and that both sides engaged in gunfights making it an armed riot. If you are still uncomfortable with this course of action, maybe we can compromise by separating Odessa in the campaignbox and marking it as Other like with the Afghan box, or mark the others in the box as military operations while Odessa under civilian unrest or some-such. EkoGraf (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Donbass People's Militia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

ChristopherDAOS (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ChristopherDAOS: - I don't know when and where did you come up from with that, but my last edit there was 2 1/2 weeks ago and was eventually uncontested, since the content in dispute did not meet the requirements of WP:WEIGHT and WP:LEAD among other issues. Also, this was going to be my last revert before bringing it up on the article's talk page. You're probably new here, so welcome, but please think twice before you attempt to blackmail other editors. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a summary of the Presidency Morsi with events? It is to write an article --Panam2014 (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: - You want a summary of what he did throughout his presidency or a summary of what generally happened in Egypt during that time? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Fitz. The two proposal. For french wiki in english or french. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It will be ready by tomorrow maximum. Sounds good? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you finished ? --Panam2014 (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Finish ? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you finish? Panam2014 (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not being able to keep my word and finish it on time. I've been preoccupied with many other things in and outside of Wikipedia, but now I can say I'm partly free. I will try to update my thread on your talk page (in the French Wiki) as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When the work will be finished ? --Panam2014 (talk) 12:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camille Lepage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Lepage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. damiens.rf 15:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ThaddeusB (talk) 14:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		Researcher's Barnstar
		I am both pleased and honored to present you with the Researcher's Barnstar in appreciation for your superb work improving the article on the film WInter Sleep. Excellent work! Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The honor is mine, thanks a lot! :) Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He became a member of the anti coup alliance ? Panam2014 (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently he is → [5] Fitzcarmalan (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

he did not participate in the event on June 30? Panam2014 (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He was Morsi's ally, so I'm sure he didn't. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I became Islamist ? I remember in 2005 Essam al Eryan Muslim Brotherhood has demanded his release. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, look at my contributions, I want to request the removal of items inutilies but I do not know how. Can you help me?--Panam2014 (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't understand what the problem is. Can you specify, please? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know how to create the page to vote for the removal of these unnecessary pages. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which unnecessary pages? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Third Republic, Egyptian Fourth Republic, Egyptian Fifth Republic, Egyptian Third Republic and Arab Republic of Egypt (1971–2012) --Panam2014 (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget Arab Republic of Egypt (1971–2012). Panam2014 (talk) 18:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - I nominated Egyptian Third Republic, Egyptian Fourth Republic and Egyptian Fifth Republic because I am convinced they are WP:OR and that they were forked from other articles. But I think it would wiser to simply rename Arab Republic of Egypt (1971–2012) to History of modern Egypt (1971–2012) and disambiguate it. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am agree. Can you rename ? Panam2014 (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really feel comfortable about it, given that the article was already proposed for deletion. Perhaps someone like David O. Johnson knows what to do with this one? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As it is I who made the request for deletion I withdraw to rename. Panam2014 (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Fitzcarmalan (talk) 04:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand where you are coming from, but this article is soon to be GA reviewed. An RM isn't necessary, only a WP:RM/TR. Regardless, such an RM would be disruptive to the GA process. Wouldn't it be better to hold off until that process is complete? RGloucester — ☎ 01:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Minya court rulings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Have you got a photo of former President Adly Mansour ? regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there are any photos of him around here.[6] I'm also not on good terms with the image policy, so I don't think I can be very helpful on this. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fitz Then you finish the job sources Morsi when? Because I'm writing the article? Thank you.

--Panam2014 (talk) 12:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to finish it in the next 2 days but I can't promise anything. The events that unfolded during Morsi's presidency are longer than I thought. In the meantime you can also take a look at 2012–13 Egyptian protests where you might find some helpful details. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Good luck and let me know if you have any questions. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will keep that in mind. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed in several occasions that you represent a part in Egyptian case and work for them as a Wikipedia editor. I have noticed your edits are unbiased in Egyptian and Islamists issues. Please refrain from doing so or you will be reported to be blocked by Wiki senior admins. --Usaeedi (talk) 08:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]