Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 38.105.132.130 - ""
→‎A kitten for you!: new WikiLove message
Tag: wikilove
Line 79: Line 79:


Thank you! <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/38.105.132.130|38.105.132.130]] ([[User talk:38.105.132.130|talk]]) 21:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Thank you! <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/38.105.132.130|38.105.132.130]] ([[User talk:38.105.132.130|talk]]) 21:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== A kitten for you! ==

[[File:Kitten-stare.jpg|left|150px]]
Thanks for your edits on One World Trade Center!

[[User:CookieMonster755|CookieMonster755]] ([[User talk:CookieMonster755|talk]]) 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>

Revision as of 01:12, 5 November 2014










October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Holmes Christian School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //goliath.ecnext.com/premium/0199/0199-7184211.html Robyn M. McCrory: Mayor: City of Lexington.(50 Leading...]" ''[[Mississippi Business Journal]]''. October 29, 2007. Retrieved from [[Google

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 86th Street (Manhattan) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Diamond Jim Brady]] (former – businessman and philanthropist <ref>{{cite web|url=http://gotham.fromthesquare.org/?p=100 |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes and refs

I started a thread regarding the use of "notes". Do chime in.

Peter Isotalo 15:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Epicgenius (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween cheer!

Thanks, K6ka. You have a happy Halloween, too! – Epicgenius (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive IP

A suggestion, I would ignore as reverting that many times on his page may lead to your own block. WCMemail 10:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Next time I encounter this user, I won't do it, but I've already reverted him many times, something I already regret. Epicgenius (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes. Look, first of all I don't think that their message was trolling. They have something to say. You (and many others) may not like it, but it's not for the lolz. Besides, we typically give users leeway on their own talk pages, and there is no reason not to do so in this case. I've heard far, far worse from blocked editors (with accounts!), and blanking talk page content should really only be done for clear vandalism or messing with others' words, for instance. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Drmies, thank you for adding your opinion. I admit I may have been wrong, but I had removed the content because it contained personal attacks, not just because I disagreed.

      However, I politely disagree with you on the point of their trolling; they made edit summaries like "Grow up", "this surely is the best way to build an encyclopaeida [sic]", "What a productive Wikipedian you are", "do you think you're being just a tiny bit disruptive", and "I loved your failure to post at WP:AIV by the way", to name a few. These edit summaries seem inflammatory to some, and they fall under the purview of trolling, even if only marginally.

      In any case, I won't do it again because it's pointless, and I apologize if you or anyone else has found fault with my actions. Epicgenius (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

      • Oh, I'm not saying they're a paragon of good manners... Drmies (talk) 15:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 1 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Long Beach, New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • estate developer, entered the picture. Reynolds had already developed four Brooklyn neighborhoods ([[Bedford-Stuyvesant]], [[Borough Park, Brooklyn|Borough Park]], [[Bensonhurst, Brooklyn|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Selena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brittany Maynard: "Her death, from barbiturates, was confirmed by her husband, Daniel Diaz, who noted that in accordance with Oregon law her death certificate listed a brain tumor as the cause." http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/04/us/brittany-maynard-death-with-dignity-ally-dies-at-29.html

Please leave brain tumor as cause of death. This is what is on her death certificate. A lung cancer patient may get pneumonia but in the end it's lung cancer that killed him. The article explains that it was assisted suicide. As Brittany preferred, it was death with dignity and it was the brain tumor that killed her, she just assisted in letting death happen sooner. She would not have taken the barbituates if she didn't have cancer that was going to make her suffering far worse before it killed her.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.105.132.130 (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your edits on One World Trade Center!

CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply