In the fine Wikipedia tradition, I am happy to give you this barnstar to recognize all your hard work. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For a great deal of hard work to improve articles on a wide range of topics. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on the La Trobes or Latrobes. Nice to see the articles developing. Victuallers (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 09:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Ewawer, thank you for your great job in expanding the article I created about mixed bathing. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 04:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for your awesome work on the Bikini article. I have been looking for a good copyeditor for so long now, that I find it hard to believe that the article finally has someone of you caliber to work on it. Aditya(talk • contribs) 13:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would you like to help us with the lead section oft the article : Proposals for a Palestinian state ? Would be very nice. Thank you Miraclexix (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please see the talk page? I have some issues with your edit. nableezy - 23:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised the heading of this section from We need your help! to Proposals for a Palestinian state, in harmony with WP:TPOC (Section headings). Miraclexix (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Thank you for the professional teamwork! Miraclexix (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of aircraft registration prefixes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia into Section 96 of the Constitution of Australia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. You were already advised back in January to start doing this. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you are having trouble understanding what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Commonwealth Grants Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goods and Services Tax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Income tax in Australia page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Brothel into History of prostitution. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Here is a sample edit summary. This is your third warning. If you don't understand what it is you have to do or why we need to do it, please let me know. Please start doing this or you could be blocked from editing.— Diannaa (talk) 21:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian Labor Party (Victorian Branch), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Thwaites (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Australian federal election, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stickee (talk) 12:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not edit warring, you are. The introduced material is very relevant and worthy of being mentioned. These conclusions are the unanimous words of the High Court of Australia. Surely this must merit extra weight.Enthusiast01 (talk) 12:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Return on capital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valuation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Energy in Victoria (Australia) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Enthusiast01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cabcharge Australia Ltd for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Cabcharge.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. The Colour in Anything (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just move the old page? The Colour in Anything (talk) 01:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cabcharge Australia has many companies and activities in its stable beyond its original activity of Cabcharge payment system in taxis. It now operates a taxi fleet through numerous brands, bus services, taxi booking systems etc. I propose to make Cabcharge deal with the payment system in taxis, and give a company over view in Cabcharge Australia Ltd. Enthusiast01 (talk) 01:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but you should definitely include the many controversies and criticisms found on the original page. The Colour in Anything (talk) 01:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Cabcharge Australia Ltd has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]