An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resulting trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laches.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gun serial number is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gun serial number until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  02:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Civil registration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Certificate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here. I think the move is fine, but it broke the talk page archiving system. Can you update the template so it links to the archives Talk:History of the Jews in Poland/Archive 7 and prior? TIA. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gun serial number, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a gun serial number can be any random set of numbers letters or a character string? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gun serial number. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gun serial number), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jordanian nationality law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BPAY, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You make some important points in your edits to the lede (lead) of the Murder article, but at present they appear to constitute original research. Statements in the lede do not require citations to reliable sources if the points made in the lede are discussed in the body of the article with citations to reliable sources. I did not see the points you made in the lede discussed in the body of the article (if I missed them, please let me know). I did not revert your edit because I think it's a valuable contribution if you can either provide citations in the lede or discuss those points in the body of the article (with citations to reliable sources). All the best - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 14:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-Jewish boycotts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Enthusiast01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Merit Protection Commissioner for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Template:Z166

John B123 (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source webpage is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. This article would probably not have been deleted had the appropriate attribution been included. — Diannaa (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article and added the required attribution. Please consider adding some Wikiproject templates to the talk pages of your article creations. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Official Secretary to the Governor of Victoria you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavery in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Official Secretary to the Governor of Victoria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited General ledger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you add material without any source and then mark it as citation needed?Diff. I haven't looked too hard but I am pretty sure that multiple sources contradict this claim? I also don't understand why you are focused on things that are outside the temporal jurisdiction of the ICC, the ICC can't do anything about those so why is it relevant? Selfstudier (talk) 12:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added the points as to why the matters mentioned are outside the ICC’s jurisdiction to indicate, even before it starts, how one-sided the investigation will of necessity be. I was also going to add, to the effect, “and furthermore, the ICC investigation would look at any retaliation and counter-measure taken by Israel within the Gaza Strip, without regard to the actions by the Palestinians that led to them.” I’m sure these points are important to include and I’m sure I’m not original, though offhand I haven’t had the time to find the source. Also, these matters go to the court’s jurisdiction, and its limitations. Enthusiast01 (talk) 13:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it might be something like that. If you think the investigation is "one sided" then what we need are reliable sources saying that. Also any discussion along the lines of "who first caused the problem" (chain of causality) is going to go nowhere, how far back are you willing to go? 1917? Strictly in ICC terms, they cannot really go back to before they were set up, it is possible in some circumstances for the court to investigate things that took place before 13 June 2014 (continuing events, for example) and in any case, the ICC decides which crimes to prosecute, if any. A main idea of the ICC is to provide justice where none has been dealt. So to take the case of the teenagers, they were already subjected to trial and judgement so what would be the point in the ICC doing it again? Whereas in the case of the rockets, Gaza events, settlement enterprise, no such justice has been seen. As for the rockets, it is straightforwardly clear that the court has juridiction, idk where you have got the idea that they are excluded and really you should not include controversial statements like that unsourced.Selfstudier (talk) 13:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palestine Monetary Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Mandate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the 1RR at 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis. Please self-revert your latest revert or you may be reported and potentially blocked from editing. nableezy - 21:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you have continued editing since this notice and declined to self-revert I'll be reporting the violation to arbitration enforcement. nableezy - 14:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported to arbitration enforcement, please see here nableezy - 15:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Export

added a link pointing to Custom

Export control

added a link pointing to Sanction

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 20:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enthusiast01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Official Secretary to the Governor of Victoria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at Governor of Victoria. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Elections in Australia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia is not a compatible license. — Diannaa (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]