An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resulting trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laches.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gun serial number is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gun serial number until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  02:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Civil registration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Certificate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here. I think the move is fine, but it broke the talk page archiving system. Can you update the template so it links to the archives Talk:History of the Jews in Poland/Archive 7 and prior? TIA. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gun serial number, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a gun serial number can be any random set of numbers letters or a character string? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gun serial number. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gun serial number), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jordanian nationality law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BPAY, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You make some important points in your edits to the lede (lead) of the Murder article, but at present they appear to constitute original research. Statements in the lede do not require citations to reliable sources if the points made in the lede are discussed in the body of the article with citations to reliable sources. I did not see the points you made in the lede discussed in the body of the article (if I missed them, please let me know). I did not revert your edit because I think it's a valuable contribution if you can either provide citations in the lede or discuss those points in the body of the article (with citations to reliable sources). All the best - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 14:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-Jewish boycotts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Enthusiast01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Merit Protection Commissioner for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Template:Z166

John B123 (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source webpage is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. This article would probably not have been deleted had the appropriate attribution been included. — Diannaa (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article and added the required attribution. Please consider adding some Wikiproject templates to the talk pages of your article creations. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Official Secretary to the Governor of Victoria you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]