NOTICE: Make sure if you're not using the "New Section" function that all new messages go at the very bottom of this page. Now, directory time:

The shows I put up are legitimate "Shadowhunters (TV Series)" is premiering on January 12, 2016 and "Guilt (TV Series)" and "Beyond (TV Series)" were picked up to series on November 5, 2015 check Deadline

The modifcation that I did The Adventures of Pinocchio was to add some file and sections. there is nothing wrong.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Giovannigiulio (talk • Special:Contributions/Giovannigiulio) 14:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already checked the Discovery Family Channel schedule and Animaniacs isn't on it. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. My bad. Thought it was, given what showed up on TV listings and whatnot. Electricburst1996 (talk) 00:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, just a note--if the vandals know you're upset, they'll keep doing it. You gots to play it coooool. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		For standing up to sleaze and arrogance when no one else had the guts. zzz (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At Dread Pirate Roberts (Silk Road), following these developments, in which you were completely uninvolved. Thanks! zzz (talk) 13:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richie Rich. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Electricburst, Thanks for your note and interest in this issue. Basically the answer to your question is that I asked for what I thought I could get. The E-cigarette article has attracted a number of fairly militant activists, some of which were previously Wikipedia editors (with varying levels of activity) and many of which were recruited by canvassing efforts on Twitter and electronic cigarette websites. Many of them spend 12 hours or more a day editing either the article or the talk page, and are determined to make the article present their POV that electronic cigarettes are the long sought panacea for tobacco addiction. It is a troubling situation.

In the past, every effort to bring the more extreme members of this group to ANI and get some sort of control over the incivil behavior, POV editing, and combative behavior has not been very successful. We end up with a large group of allies showing up on the ANI page claiming that the criticism is just a content dispute and counter-filing ANI charges against the handful of long term wikipedia editors who still have the patience to try to keep the article from becoming a sales brochure. The ANIs usually get closed as "no consensus".

So I don't know what to say except that I'm surprised that the proposal for a topic ban against TheNorlo has gotten as far as it has. I really appreciate that you weighed in here. But I think the solid movement achieved so far may lose momentum if we go for a permanent ban at this point. Formerly 98 (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Latin America). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bjelleklang - talk 20:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television#Amending the MOS centered around whether or not we want to deprecate the Broadcast section in articles, and if not, how we want that content to be presented. In the past it has been stuffed full of unsourced nation cruft, which we no longer support, but there's still some question as to what qualifies as an "English-speaking nation" and we need to work out the language details. If this is something that interests you, please participate! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		for being dedicated to helping fight vandalism and reporting it with very good summaries. TheMagikCow (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheMagikCow:, this is a great honor for me to have. Thanks! ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 15:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I assume they won't be aired because all of the programs they carry were mentioned at the upfront is either returning or new. But I'll assume that Inspector Gadget, Wabbit, and Be Cool Scooby Doo will air on Boomerang. They did mention airing original programming after all. Dcbanners (talk) 12:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The editor you are going back and forth with at Talk:List of programs broadcast by Boomerang ‎ is "The UPN Vandal". For several years, he has been adding fake future kids' shows (often Mario, Tonka, Ben 10, etc.) and/or making absurd "predictions" on talk pages. Discussing things with him is impossible. Asking him to stop does not work. I recommend taking each IP directly to ARV with the note "New IP for The UPN Vandal" and adding "{{ipsock|The UPN Vandal}}<!--- See [[User:SummerPhD/UPN]] for details. --->" to the top of IP's talk page. It is not a permanent solution, but shutting down a handful of IPs usually quiets him down for a week or two. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SummerPhD: I created a Long-Term Abuse page for him, found at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/The UPN Vandal. In researching for the page, I found out exactly why he was called the UPN Vandal, and found out he's been at this game since 2007. Hey, I felt he was worthy of a case file. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 23:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've updated my subpage. I'll take a look and see if there's anything else worth keeping and redirect it. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Electricburst1996. I read your message regarding the Cartoon Network's Template, and I also gave a look at all the changes listed in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. I can tell you that I've never done vandalism on that page but are the other users (registered or not) that they do, because I re-edit the template for two reasons:
1) There are some mistakes in spelling, date and more;
2) To resolve the matter once and for all Sonic Boom (and beyond), I created a section in his talk page entitled "Production by other companies", in which I explained in detail what the TV series you have to officially put in that paragraph.

Luigi1090 (talk)

@Luigi1090: The problem is, you weren't seeking consensus on the matter. And even then, other editors have expressed their feelings:

• "This show is shown on Cartoon Network, regardless of whether or not it's owned by Cartoon Network. Another issue is, I don't think the end dates need to be in the template when they are already found in the respective articles for TV series. That would be a bit redundant, I think."
• "I also don't think that the show needs to have executive producers in charge for Cartoon Network in order for it to be added. That seems a bit restrictive."

It's people like you that got the page fully protected for a week. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 11:36, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-restore1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. I have also nominated uw-restore2, 3 and 4 respectively. TL22 (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the mistake.I looked at the list of My Life as a teenage robot and said that it ended on Nick on Sep. 9, 2005 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:8B00:A42C:C155:45C8:16A0:D51C (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EB, some of your Phil A. Fry diffs don't appear to be working for me. Just a heads-up. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:, is it the code I'm using? ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 18:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it was a few mistaken pipes |. Easy to get confused with external and internal links—I've done it. Fixed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure if I understand your points with these two edits: [1][2]. Are you saying that they're just incorrect? This edit did remove a ton of stuff—the template is massive though. I'd have to see what guidelines exist for templates before commenting. I don't do much editing of templates. The simplification of broadcast dates is something I think should be done more of. The date ranges are unsourced, and there's zero presumption that any of that stuff is accurate. As you've probably heard me whine before, I'm not even sure if something like that could ever satisfy WP:V and to me it's just another page that can fall prey to numerical vandalism. How would you ever verify that reruns aired on Boomerang when nobody cares about reruns? Episode guides are not written for reruns. But that's a debate for another day. This edit does not seem constructive to me and I have reverted it. I'll have to look a little deeper, I guess. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Yes, I'm saying these - [3][4] - are incorrect. And as for this edit - [5] - it's the reasoning that did it in for me. "This looks like crap" is a pathetic excuse to simplify. My reasoning against simplification is that it would be confusing to the reader - they could think that a particular show ran until the end of the year, and by omitting gaps in a show's run, they could think that a show ran for all the years within the simplified range. But there's always two sides to an issue, I presume. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my edit removed when Iron Man did air on Nicktoons on May 1st. TheUpdates (talk) 22:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheUpdates: You didn't provide a reliable source. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm Look at the website it clearly states that they air in on a video at 1pm EST.^[1]

@Electricburst1996:

TheUpdates (talk) 22:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Just letting you know I removed the "Bunked" thing from the "List of Programs Broadcast by Disney" page because its been confirmed as "Bunk'd", the "Jessie" spinoff and was already listed under the upcoming live action shows. So I removed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijoshiexo (talk • contribs) 01:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EB, thanks for taking charge of the DICNeons+/Maelbros SPI report. I spotted him earlier, reverted a bunch of his nonsense and I'd apprised admin C.Fred that it might be Maelbros, but I was exhausted and fell asleep before I could get around to reporting. Anyhow, just wanted to thank you. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, the "vandal's version" I went back to was - yours. That's the problem with those articles: They don't cite sources. I can't really tell whether the current version is any more correct. Can you? Huon (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Well, it's pretty obviously unlikely that Out of the Box would've aired on broadcast TV, and Teacher's Pet didn't debut until 2000. The latter was a major tip-off to me. Also, the vandal in question was a sockpuppet of Maelbros. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:50, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Electricburst1996. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChrisRock1998.
Message added 20:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 20:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EB, re this, perhaps I'm misinterpreting it, but the statement "This show is, or was, airing on Boomerang" seems vague to me. What value is being served by making a reader guess whether a thing is or isn't on the block, or was, but now no longer is? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I decided on that phrasing as a catch-all term for shows that also aired on Boomerang, even if they no longer air on the channel. Now that you mention it, however, better phrasing could be used. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 16:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EB, I saw your edit at Cartoon Network. It might be of value to know that unlike many businesses where exceeding your budget = profit, films are different. I've always understood that a film typically has to gross twice its budget for there to be a profit. This has something to do with back-end deals, promotional expenses, etc. as detailed somewhat in this article. Hope this is of value to you. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't don't template my page again. I've been here 10 years and I'm not a newbie so don't treat me like one. Removing these "warnings" is my way of keeping my page clean. Anyways, what I did at 2015 in American television was remove duplicate sources. One story doesn't need a pair of nearly identical sources, its excessive and redundant. TomCat4680 (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add to this... Electricburst1996 users are free to remove warnings any time they wish from their own user talk page. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:05, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Came to say the same thing as Zack: see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages. Josh Milburn (talk) 00:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't ask for information? --D-D-Dark (talk), 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi EB. Was poking around and I noticed this. Any editor is welcome to remove warnings from their own talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:32, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to post two notices at User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Make that three notices within about 10 minutes. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Electricburst1996: I saw you on WP:ANI.I just want to give you advice that, you don't use words like "crazy" for other editors it will weaken your case, you should be polite, so that people will take you seriously. Second things is, you have digits "1996" in your name which give impression that you born in year 1996 and you are just 19 year old, with apparent age 19 and with use of words like "crazy" and exclusive interest in TV program articles, people will think that you are "just a kid". When someone apparently look like kid then even if you do good edits people see "something bad" in it. There is facility to change usernames, I suggest you to change your username "Electricburst1996" to "Electricburst1976", it will show that you are probably well matured person. It is sad but many times it depends on which editor is adding text to article than what text he/she is adding even if it is sourced. Cheers. --Human3015^{Send WikiLove}  03:53, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Human3015: What? And lie about my age? ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 04:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You no need to expose your age, you can drop year from username. Or keep 2096 (add 100 year). For example, 3015 in my username is actually year 3015 AD. I'm Human from future thats why my name is Human3015. I joined Wikipedia in this year only (2015), but instead of keeping 2015 I kept 3015 to give different look. You don't keep 1996, you are clearly looking like kid which is not good for you as a editor. --Human3015^{Send WikiLove}  04:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Human3015: I don't think I'll be changing my username. I don't want to do it if I'm under pressure to do so. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 04:29, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not useful advice. We encourage strong editors of all ages. EB needn't hide. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EB, I know you have strong feelings about this issue with TRPOD, but I have to strongly advise you to consider removing or striking through and apologizing for this post. Another editor's personal opinion about another user should not be used in a discussion about policy/guideline matters. The axiom is "comment on content, not on the contributor". You were on track when you commented that WP:CRYSTAL has to do with unsourced future events. Keep going with the on-topic comments that are reflective of the way the community already feels, but stay away from the personal zingers. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Done, replaced by a Request for Comment. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...info would be useful :) What discussion would you like me to take a look at at WPTV? There are a number of open/active ones. Only in death does duty end (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Only in death: "Heated discussion about future programming" is the one you should look at. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 18:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV#What_is_wrong_with_adding_an_empty_header_for_upcoming_programs_with_instructions_in_html.3F. I added an empty section with instructions within the edit html about what can be listed within a section. But "TheRedPenOfDoom" deleted the entire section with instructions. I have left it there so that anyone who wants to edit the section can see the criteria about what can be listed within the section. See his edits here.. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV&type=revision&diff=675828438&oldid=675822586

Am I violating any rule that prevents me from adding an empty header with instructions? Your reply would be gratefully appreciated. Manoflogan (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Manoflogan: I think he's asshurt about the fact that it was a future program section. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the CN schedule, you can see for tomorrow that the show is coming back at 9:00am. http://www.locatetv.com/listings/cartoon-network#17-Aug-2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.92.57.112 (talk) 02:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Electricburst, but they only put it on for that week to promote the Uncle Grandpa Babies Special, they didn't air it on Friday. Theexploringgamer (talk) 17:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-unsourced4im has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the Mixels part, but why did you have to change all the Pokemon stuff I put there. That took me a long while to edit... I'm going to revert it, and then put Mixels back. Please do not change Pokemon. The reason why I put Pokemon The Series XY is because I'm someone who likes sorting by date, and I don't like how Pokemon has been there since like 2002, put it series by series... so it's 2015.

Theexploringgamer (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC) By the way, I'm also autistic. Nice to see another editor close to my age. Theexploringgamer (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please illuminate me as to why this reversion was sound. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: per MOS:DATERANGE:

A pure year–year range is written (as is any range) using an en dash (– or {{ndash}}) not a hyphen or slash; this dash is usually unspaced (that is, with no space on either side); and the range's end year is usually abbreviated to two digits:

  •   1881–86;  1881–92 (not 1881–6;  1881 – 86)

Markup: 1881{{ndash}}86 or 1881–86

ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. bear in mind that it was the same edit you made with this edit.

I'm still not seeing the problem. In this edit, 2001–2015 becomes 2001–15, 2005–2014 becomes 2005–14, etc. The ranges have en dashes. The dashes are not spaced. The end dates are abbreviated. What's the specific problem? In 3 reverts nobody's actually explained what the specific problem is. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I figured it out. Grape reverted his own edits, then I reverted his reversion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Electricburst1996. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WWEPPVPosters.
Message added 18:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I say the series does meet notability guidelines, as it is an (older) program from the top preschool cable channel in the U.S. However, because of its age, it is hard to find much information on it; this does not mean that it is any less notable than another Nick Jr. program. Squiddaddy (talk) 20:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved CMT on the Viacom Media Networks wiki page from kids & family group to music and entertainment. You moved it back to the kids & family group when that is incorrect. I have my source from Viacom's website that states CMT is part of the Music and Entertainment group. ^[1] Ctrg298 (talk) 00:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can I ask you a question? LoBianco (talk), 3 September 2015 (UTC)

@LoBianco: Sure. Is this about my edit to the Cartoon Network page? ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 15:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Electricburst1996: Really there are two things. Ok, I start with the first: in the TV Shedule of Catoon Network ([6]) I see that Sonic Boom is almost always transmitted only on Saturday and Sunday, and all the episodes are replicas; I think therefore that the series is ended and now is replicated, or not? Thanks. LoBianco (talk), 3 September 2015 (UTC)

@LoBianco: Sonic Boom is clearly listed as "returning" on CN's 2015 upfront. Often, there is a lull between one season and another of a show that could possibly last months. In addition, there is no official confirmation that the show has ended/been cancelled, and it hasn't been 12 months since the previous episode aired yet. Once 12 months have passed with no new episodes or info, a show is officially considered "dead" unless something turns up later on. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 17:52, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Electricburst1996: Ok, thank you! The second thing would instead the page Sonic the Hedgehog (TV series). I was looking around and I found that the series was produced by Reteitalia in association with Telecinco. This can see on IMDb and in the credits ([7]). I thought to write it on the page, but I saw in the Histoy that other people had written this, but then you have reverted the edit. Can you explain why you did it? Can you keep the edit if I put a ref? As the two studies are respectively Italian and Spanish, the series is Italian-Spanish-American? Thanks and sorry to bother you. LoBianco (talk), 3 September 2015 (UTC)

@LoBianco: The reason it keeps getting reverted is because everyone who has added it so far is a block-evading sockpuppet of Giovannigiulio. Personally, I don't see how it is even relevant to the article. I think it would be in your best interest if you first seek consensus on the article's talk page, since most of the editors who added it were problematic to begin with. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Electricburst1996: Ok, thanks, I will write this on the talk page. But I can put the two studies in the infobox or is better to wait? LoBianco (talk), 3 September 2015 (UTC)

@Electricburst1996: Do you think that the show is American-Italian-Spanish or that it was only animated by Italian and Spanish studies? In this promozional image ([8]) there is the logo of Reteitalia (wich is part of Mediaset) so I think that the show is also Italian. LoBianco (talk), 4 September 2015 (UTC)

@Electricburst1996: What? You told me to talk about it in the talk page. LoBianco (talk), 4 September 2015 (UTC)

What? It's not my fault it didn't initially come to my attention you were a sockpuppet! ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted the linked edit as "Not constructive". The image in question needs a better licence-it was originally dual licenced as CC/GFDL and was about to be moved to Commons when someone found out that it depicted a copyrighted product cover and removed the licence. Unfortunately, they added the template [[Template:Do not move to Commons|

]] (which supposed to be for EU images from before 1923 whose artists died less than 70 years ago) without a reason. Why was my edit unconstructive? I'm fine with the removal,but check what you're reverting edits to. I still think the image should be tagged with [[Template:Non-free product cover|

]] and retagged as fair use (it may be needed to show bilingual Skittles packaging). If you disagree,explain your reasoning and what licence you think it should have. In any case it needs something better than what it has now. Hop on Bananas (talk) 23:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This one had no edit summary. I thought

-tagged files were supposed to list the date they should be moved to Commons. By the way,I got this one wrong-it's 2025, not 2024. I understand if you're reverting edits by new users, but please actually read what your reverting to and from. Hop on Bananas (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? I understand if you're too busy with other things or something like that, but it's been a week and you haven't responded to either query (this one or the one regarding the Skittles edit). Unless you actually think that

without a year to move to Commons is better than with one, I assume you didn't look at what you were reverting to and from. Anyway, I've reverted your edit, if you think this is turning into an edit war, bring it up at a noticeboard (which one would be appropriate) and see what the admins say. (By the way, is there a policy page that explains what to do in situations like this? I'll look for one. Hop on Bananas (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the following URL http://www.televisionpost.com/television/zindagi-launches-new-drama-in-afternoon-band/ as a source about a program being broadcast on Zindagi. This is the correct information and be corroborated by https://twitter.com/zindagi/status/633180202101682176 and https://www.facebook.com/ZeeZindagiTV/photos/a.228970673964964.1073741828.225241597671205/377607922434571/. This conforms to the guidelines listed by WP:SOCIALMEDIA. Would you consider this a valid source? I think that it does. Television post publishes blog posts about the television, movies and other media but the company also offers detailed research information for a fee. "TRPOD" feels that the source is in this case is some one's personal blog, so it should not be considered. But I think the site represents a valid source because the information is verifiable and attributable. Once again, the source is http://www.televisionpost.com/television/zindagi-launches-new-drama-in-afternoon-band/ See

• http://www.televisionpost.com/about-televisionpost/ and
• http://www.televisionpost.com/research/

Your advice on whether this site represents a reliable source would be gratefully appreciated. I would like to request feedback about the following commits if possible. I believe that the information does not violate the guidelines of WP:SOCIALMEDIA and WP:PRIMARY and therefore can be used as references to determine that a series indeed premiered on a particular date.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV&type=revision&diff=679854444&oldid=679851801
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV&type=revision&diff=679860434&oldid=679854444

Manoflogan (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a source for you guys.^[1] Better? :)

List of programs broadcast by MTV2 I did not remove your edits. LFL and Bellator were already listed in Special events; Guy Code is still in production; and I moved MTV shows not currently airing on MTV2 to Former. -_- MarcoPolo250 (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)MarcoPolo250[reply]

Again, I did not remove your edits! LFL and Bellator were already listed in Special events; Guy Code is still in production; and I moved MTV shows not currently airing on MTV2 to Former; and Fear Factor is currently airing in reruns! MarcoPolo250 (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)MarcoPolo250[reply]

@MarcoPolo250: If so, then explain why Wild 'N Out was removed completely. THAT I have a problem with. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 17:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up: IP editors are allowed to blank warnings.[11] See WP:BLANKING for what IPs may not remove from their talk pages (such as shared IP notices, active unblocks, etc.) Thanks– Gilliam (talk) 12:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EB, re: this edit (and similar), you might get quicker remedy if you include the name of the suspected sock in your edit summary. "Block evasion - ChrisRock1998" or something similar would make it easier for admins to understand who you're complaining about. Just a thought. Have a good remainder of the weekend. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hai, I have nominated the film article Loham for GA-status. Which is currently on "Hold on" time and there are some corrections to be done before it ends. Mainly copy editing for grammer and writting style. For making it a good article there are some suggestions referred in Talk:Loham. I invite you to make your contributions to it. Charles Turing (talk) 08:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should all the CN original series be grouped together, or should the subsection that says "Cartoon Cartoons" remain? Also, should the list of reruns on The Cartoon Cartoon Show/Top 5 be included, or removed? I added them because I thought CN geeks like me and you would be interested in it; however, it might make the table look cluttered.--Phil A. Fry (talk) 01:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Phil A. Fry: I think all the CN originals should be grouped together, not because of clutter, but because even for archival reasons, the Cartoon Cartoons name has long been retired. Take a good look at the current selection of CN shows on Hulu Plus - Dexter's Laboratory has actually been assimilated under the new "A Cartoon Network Original" banner that was first used with We Bare Bears. On the subject of The Cartoon Cartoon Show/Top 5, I'm indifferent to the whole thing. I couldn't give a damn if it stayed or not. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 01:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EB, I can't recall if we've ever discussed this, but regarding this, are you aware that you are not required to notify a suspected sock that they are a suspected sock? It's not like ANI--sock reports don't require notifications, and in most cases, (from my years of experience) there is no good reason to tip them off. In this case, the main Maelbros account has been socking for well over a year using sock accounts and IPs and it's not likely they'll ever log back in to their main, indeffed account to check out their warnings. I'm only bringing this up because I'd hate to see you invest time that you weren't required to spend. Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: I wasn't previously informed about this. Thanks for the memo. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 03:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Enjoy all the time you save! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given your lack of reason in objecting in identify The Disney Afternoon as "Disney-Kellogg Alliance", which disqualifies it for 3Opinion and the lack of any response to the RfComments, I intend to follow the rules that any information from reliable sources and will be adding back to the article per WP:NNC. Spshu (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Electricburst1996. You have new messages at Talk:The Disney Afternoon#Disney-Kellogg Alliance.
Message added 19:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Spshu (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Afternoon Avenue

Please don't remove better sourcing added to the Disney Afternoon Avenue as a part of the dispute over Disney-Kellogg Alliance. --Spshu (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was not my intention. That slipped under my radar as I was going back to a previous revision. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 19:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-error4im has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that and the other (talk) 09:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I was trying to find a reliable source for network switch for Impact Wrestling. I'm trying to find a source with a press release from Pop and/or TNA that is reliable enough to place it there. I wanted to use WrestlingInc.com, but I don't know if it's an ok source material.--Keith Okamoto (talk) 21:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but don't you have better things to do than to check my talk page and see what I do? Seriously it's getting ridiculous and enough is enough already. Please leave me alone and lastly have a great day. :) --HappyAppy10

@HappyAppy10: At least give some indication that you have read the notices on your talk page. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 16:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thanks for the reply. --HappyAppy10

So Transformers didn't air this morning? Carbrera (talk) 23:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just got several pictures from bloggers who recorded the broadcast this morning on Boomerang. It definitely aired. Carbrera (talk) 04:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice, you are digging yourself an even deeper hole the more you say in the ANI. Accept that you screwed up, tried to game the system, and accept whatever punishment comes your way. Cease all else. Do not try to defend this behavior, do not try to rationalize it. It was wrong, and you are sorry you did it. Trust me, you are only making this worse for yourself by continuing. --Tarage (talk) 06:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarage: I waved my white flag yesterday with this edit. I have not edited the page since. I knew I would do myself a disservice if I were to continue making an arse of myself. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 17:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you did the exact opposite of what I said to do. You kept talking, you didn't just take your punishment and move on, and now you are trying to play the martyr and fall on your sword. Stop. No one is saying you should stop editing, no one is saying you should vanish. Just take your whomping, learn from it, and move on. Stop the theatrics. --Tarage (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the boomerang has been thrown (even with me being its "thrower"), it can't be "unthrown." However, if you were to follow Tarage's advice and accept responsibility, admit what you did, admit what you did is wrong, apologise for it, and leave Spshu alone from now on (if he ever even does come back)... I'd drop it and quit commenting on the boomerang. Saying this is you "waving the white flag," is totally bogus, though. When you later go and pursue everything all over again... that's just not a display of "waving the white flag." Either wave it properly or don't pretend like you ever even thought about grabbing the bleach.Cebr1979 (talk) 03:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I hadn't realised your post to the Laff talk page was both after Tarage posted here and after you claimed this imaginary white flag of yours.Cebr1979 (talk) 05:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^^I only just now saw your apology at ANI and, given you made it based on what I have just stricken, I will honour the deal and won't comment on the boomerang further (though, as I said, that doesn't mean it's being "unthrown" - if others continue with it, that's their prerogative). Nonetheless, thank you for doing that.Cebr1979 (talk) 05:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to say this one last time, as bluntly and clearly as I possibly can. You are wrong. It was not a personal attack. Stop. If you can't let go of that, then there is no helping you. Stop playing this game of "I'm sorry but...". You were wrong, you are going to be punished because of it, end of story. The sooner you accept this, the easier it will be to resume editing once your punishment has passed. --Tarage (talk) 19:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but I don't want to be reminded of the boomerang for the remainder of the discussion, and I don't want to be mentioned. I want to keep myself out as long as I possibly can now. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 19:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, our deal was not "I'm sorry but..." which means you just broke it. You just can't stop! (...and you can want/not want whatever you want/not want. If someone wants to remind you of the boomerang, so be it. If someone wants to mention you, sobe it. You're gonna be mentioned a lot and the boomerang is gonna be discussed.Cebr1979 (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't what I said. You need to listen. People are going to tell you that you did wrong. You do not get to say "Okay, I got it, stop talking about it." You lost that when you did the wrong thing. Suck it up, let people say what they need to say, respond "Okay" and "I understand", and move on. Quit the theatrics. Stop playing the martyr. The more you whine and drag your feet, the longer it is going to take. You are only hurting yourself right now. --Tarage (talk) 20:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to stay out. They can still talk about me, I just don't want to be summoned. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're gonna get pinged, that's just how it is.Cebr1979 (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how this works Electric. --Tarage (talk) 21:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just don't reply to the pinging/summoning if you don't feel like it or don't think it will help. LjL (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you know by now that edits like this, where you reinstate unsourced content, contravenes WP:BURDEN. If you want to pull shows from the current schedule of a major network's programming, I don't particularly care. But if in doing so, you reinstate unsourced date ranges without adding references to support that content, you're running afoul of WP:BURDEN. Anyone who's edited these TV articles for long enough, and that includes you, should know that most of the date ranges that are submitted by casual editors are highly suspect and in need of impeccable references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I come to think of it, those were one-off airings from this month. Maybe we shouldn't count one-off airings in the date ranges. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 01:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've inquired numerous times in the past with no response so went with one over the other. Now I know.Cebr1979 (talk) 00:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]