Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
E-960 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
→‎One more fix: new section
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 6: Line 6:
==Response==
==Response==
Sorry for not responding earlier (re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:E-960&oldid=809941217#German_Language_map this]) - I'm glad you placed a discussion on each of the talk pages but the wording makes it seem as if you're suggesting it when in fact you already changed it. Still, the replacement maps are mostly as good if not better. The only one one where it really didn't improve the article was at [[Elbe Germanic peoples]] (this was reverted by Bermicourt), since the new map didn't contain any mention of Elbe Germanic and the original map was integral to the article. Since most of them are not contested I'd say it worked out. [[User:Prinsgezinde|Prinsgezinde]] ([[User talk:Prinsgezinde|talk]]) 13:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Sorry for not responding earlier (re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:E-960&oldid=809941217#German_Language_map this]) - I'm glad you placed a discussion on each of the talk pages but the wording makes it seem as if you're suggesting it when in fact you already changed it. Still, the replacement maps are mostly as good if not better. The only one one where it really didn't improve the article was at [[Elbe Germanic peoples]] (this was reverted by Bermicourt), since the new map didn't contain any mention of Elbe Germanic and the original map was integral to the article. Since most of them are not contested I'd say it worked out. [[User:Prinsgezinde|Prinsgezinde]] ([[User talk:Prinsgezinde|talk]]) 13:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

== One more fix ==

*In here:
--> User François Robere has made these three changes, even though the article is under strict consensus-required prior to any changes sanctions. This follows a pattern of editing by François Robere, where he continues to blank out entire sections of text even though many of the statements have been agreed to on the talk page such as this example here [[Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland#Academic book about the GG]], yet user François Robere goes in and blanks the text as in this edit listed above [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&oldid=844095826], or removes text which was restored after he removed it previously a few days back.<--

*Replace this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&oldid=844095826

*for this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=844095826&oldid=844089452&diffmode=source

So link leads to the correct diff. There is one other error but very minor so don’t waste any more time on it just fix the above.[[User:GizzyCatBella|GizzyCatBella]] ([[User talk:GizzyCatBella|talk]]) 18:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:08, 2 June 2018

Nice work

Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the Poland article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Wikipedia. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samotny Wędrowiec, many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --E-960 (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Sorry for not responding earlier (re: this) - I'm glad you placed a discussion on each of the talk pages but the wording makes it seem as if you're suggesting it when in fact you already changed it. Still, the replacement maps are mostly as good if not better. The only one one where it really didn't improve the article was at Elbe Germanic peoples (this was reverted by Bermicourt), since the new map didn't contain any mention of Elbe Germanic and the original map was integral to the article. Since most of them are not contested I'd say it worked out. Prinsgezinde (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One more fix

*In here:
--> User François Robere has made these three changes, even though the article is under strict consensus-required prior to any changes sanctions. This follows a pattern of editing by François Robere, where he continues to blank out entire sections of text even though many of the statements have been agreed to on the talk page such as this example here Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland#Academic book about the GG, yet user François Robere goes in and blanks the text as in this edit listed above [1], or removes text which was restored after he removed it previously a few days back.<--
  • Replace this link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&oldid=844095826

  • for this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=844095826&oldid=844089452&diffmode=source

So link leads to the correct diff. There is one other error but very minor so don’t waste any more time on it just fix the above.GizzyCatBella (talk) 18:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply