Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the Poland article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Wikipedia. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samotny Wędrowiec, many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --E-960 (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not responding earlier (re: this) - I'm glad you placed a discussion on each of the talk pages but the wording makes it seem as if you're suggesting it when in fact you already changed it. Still, the replacement maps are mostly as good if not better. The only one one where it really didn't improve the article was at Elbe Germanic peoples (this was reverted by Bermicourt), since the new map didn't contain any mention of Elbe Germanic and the original map was integral to the article. Since most of them are not contested I'd say it worked out. Prinsgezinde (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Fix these links from this:

1. 2 June 2018 — changes made without gaining consensus first
2. 2 June 2018 — changes made without gaining consensus first
3. 2 June 2018 — changes made without gaining consensus first

To this:

1. [1] 14:53, 2 June 2018 — changes made without gaining consensus first
2. [2] 14:55, 2 June 2018 — changes made without gaining consensus first
3. [3] 15:47, 2 June 2018 — changes made without gaining consensus first

So they lead to actual diff. and are in correct order GizzyCatBella (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for catching my error. --E-960 (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. And again, don't revert without a substantial thought about what you are doing, especially on that page. I understand that it might be hard to stay cool when you see such a massive assault on the Polish-Jewish related material (since Feb. 2018 I think?) but chill out; this is only Wikipedia.GizzyCatBella (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]