Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)
Thinkmaths (talk | contribs)
Line 28: Line 28:


{{ping|Salvio giuliano}} {{u|Thinkmaths}} This seems to be an obvious sock of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DawnOfTheBlood DawnOfTheBlood], and no, the irony is not lost on me {{smiley}} Based on the socks [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_14&diff=prev&oldid=637870460 comment] on an already archived discussion. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 15:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
{{ping|Salvio giuliano}} {{u|Thinkmaths}} This seems to be an obvious sock of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DawnOfTheBlood DawnOfTheBlood], and no, the irony is not lost on me {{smiley}} Based on the socks [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_14&diff=prev&oldid=637870460 comment] on an already archived discussion. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 15:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

{{ping|Darkness Shines}} What? I do not even know this guy. And I did not realize that it was an archived discussion, I have removed it now.[[User:Thinkmaths|Thinkmaths]] ([[User talk:Thinkmaths|talk]]) 16:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:12, 15 December 2014

Thank you

I just want to thank you for this article (I saw that you wrote it mostly; and other similar articles as well). I also see (on the talk page) that there was a discussion about the credibility of sources, so what's the final word regarding that? Best wishes. -- KWiki (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What discussion on the sources? I used for the most part academic publishers when I rewrote the article, and to not recall anyone questioning them? Darkness Shines (talk) 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

@OccultZone: I have sent you an email.

@Drmies: Would you be so kind as to delete this page please, or remove the comment from Nangparbat. Thanks. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Actually delete the page as Russavia is now all over it, [1] Darkness Shines (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TopGun: Re this I have appealed the block on this account, and should I return to editing it will be this account that I will use. Hence revoking access to my talk page and email would be kinda wrong. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck getting unblocked but you are currently blocked and the above ping and the email has nothing to do with the allowed use of your talkpage. There are other venues if your email / tp access is blocked. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing in the rules about me mailing another user when I am blocked that I know of? Can you link the relevant policy please. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cailil: OZ is not "working" with me. I can forward the mail I sent him if you like. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TopGun: You need to stop casting aspersions mate, I have never interacted with Nuclear Arm. Why do you seem to think I am the source of all your woes?

Anyway, as my talk page access is about to be stupidly cut off I wish all a merry christmas, and hope to see you all again one day. Cheers. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For Sal, or any other CU

@Salvio giuliano: Thinkmaths This seems to be an obvious sock of DawnOfTheBlood, and no, the irony is not lost on me Based on the socks comment on an already archived discussion. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Darkness Shines: What? I do not even know this guy. And I did not realize that it was an archived discussion, I have removed it now.Thinkmaths (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply