Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎A Big Ask: new section
Line 494: Line 494:


I have made some slight changes to [[:File:Oommen Chandy, Chief Minister of Kerala.jpg|this]], what do you think about this ? I have a plan to nominate this, please do if there are any corrections. I hope nobody will object this based on EV, may be some of them will demand for the photograph with Ministerial actions, he he he <font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Mydreamsparrow|DreamSparrow]]</font> [[User talk:Mydreamsparrow|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#000000"><sup>Chat</sup></span></font>]] 18:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I have made some slight changes to [[:File:Oommen Chandy, Chief Minister of Kerala.jpg|this]], what do you think about this ? I have a plan to nominate this, please do if there are any corrections. I hope nobody will object this based on EV, may be some of them will demand for the photograph with Ministerial actions, he he he <font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Mydreamsparrow|DreamSparrow]]</font> [[User talk:Mydreamsparrow|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#000000"><sup>Chat</sup></span></font>]] 18:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

== A Big Ask ==

Hi Crisco. About 19 months ago I was working on a page where I had a conflict of interest and I couldn't bring the page up to GA myself, because I was abstaining from a section that included content about competitors. You were gracious enough to do that one section yourself.

There's a similar issue on [[Invisalign]], where most of the article is GAN-ready, but {{ping|Doc James}} has expressed concern about COI influences in regards to incorporating the content of three MEDRS sources,<ref name=Kun2014>{{cite journal|last1=Kuncio|first1=DA|title=Invisalign: current guidelines for effective treatment.|journal=The New York state dental journal|date=March 2014|volume=80|issue=2|pages=11–4|pmid=24851387}}</ref><ref name="Y Al. 2012">{{cite web | last=Y | first=Yu | last2=Al. | first2=Et | title=Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment. - PubMed | website=NCBI | date=November 9, 2012 | year=2012 | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24014170 | accessdate=August 10, 2015}}</ref><ref name="partone">{{cite journal|journal=Dental Update|date=April 2013|title=Invisible Orthodontics Part 1: Invisalign|first1=Ovals|last1=Malik|first2=Allbhe|last2=McMullin|first3=David|last3=Waring |pmid=23767109}}</ref> such as I attempted to do [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CorporateM/Invisalign here].

Medical claims have always been a sensitive area of Wikipedia (though perhaps less so for dental claims) and some areas are more sensitive to COI than others. It doesn't seem productive for me to attempt to author with with a COI. I know it's a big ask, but I thought if you had some time to spend doing this last leg of the article, it would be a huge help to all parties involved. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 22:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:40, 14 August 2015

This user is willing to be contacted in Indonesian.

User:Crisco 1492/NavBar For me.

Featured content

Nominated

Consider nominating

TFAs?

Article TFA date Rationale
Sorga Ka Toedjoe 30 October 2015 75th anniversary of Surabaya release
Amir Hamzah 20 March 2016 70th anniversary of death
Asmara Moerni 29 April 2016 75th anniversary of release

Useful links; future articles?

Java Industrial Film needs something.
Koesbini

Karja stuff

  • Laksitardjo
    Laksitardjo
  • Ngelmi Yatnamaya
    Ngelmi Yatnamaya
  • Serat Lambang Praja
    Serat Lambang Praja
  • Babad Cariyos Lampahanipun (vol. 1)
    Babad Cariyos Lampahanipun (vol. 1)
  • Babad Cariyos Lampahanipun (vol. 3)
    Babad Cariyos Lampahanipun (vol. 3)
  • Babad Tuban
    Babad Tuban
  • Kawruh Kalapa
    Kawruh Kalapa
  • Serat Pramanasidi
    Serat Pramanasidi
  • Serat Pramatisara
    Serat Pramatisara
  • Sandi Paramayoga
    Sandi Paramayoga
  • Synoniemen
    Synoniemen
  • Ngelmu Kawarasan
    Ngelmu Kawarasan
  • Serat Swaraningasepi
    Serat Swaraningasepi
  • Serat Jitaspara
    Serat Jitaspara
  • Serat Pararaton
    Serat Pararaton
  • Serat Wedhatanaya
    Serat Wedhatanaya
  • Serat Kaboetoehan
    Serat Kaboetoehan
  • Serat Kaboetoehan (alt crop)
    Serat Kaboetoehan (alt crop)
  • Babad Mataram (vol. 2)
    Babad Mataram (vol. 2)
  • Babad Mataram (vol. 4)
    Babad Mataram (vol. 4)
  • Babad Mataram (vol. 5)
    Babad Mataram (vol. 5)
  • Serat Jayabaya
    Serat Jayabaya
  • Serat Wirid Hidayat Jati
    Serat Wirid Hidayat Jati
  • Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 1)
    Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 1)
  • Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 2)
    Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 2)
  • Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 3)
    Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 3)
  • Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 3)
    Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 3)
  • Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 4)
    Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 4)
  • Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 5)
    Serat Babad Surakarta (vol 5)
  • Serat Prasidajati
    Serat Prasidajati
  • Serat Tajusalatin
    Serat Tajusalatin
  • Layang Panuntun Kamulyaning Bocah Wadon
    Layang Panuntun Kamulyaning Bocah Wadon
  • Serat Muhammad
    Serat Muhammad
  • Layang Balewarna
    Layang Balewarna
  • Serat Rekasaning Batin
    Serat Rekasaning Batin
  • Serat Purwawasana
    Serat Purwawasana
  • Serat Purwawasana
    Serat Purwawasana
  • Serat Piwulang Estri
    Serat Piwulang Estri
  • Serat Panitisastra
    Serat Panitisastra
  • Serat Widyakirana
    Serat Widyakirana
  • Serat Ngesti Darma
    Serat Ngesti Darma
  • Serat Asmaralaya
    Serat Asmaralaya
  • Serat Pustaka Raja Purwa (vol. 3)
    Serat Pustaka Raja Purwa (vol. 3)

Request part two

(So that the first half of the request can archive)

  • Simon Boccanegra  Done
    Simon Boccanegra  Done
  • Aida
    Aida
  • Aida
    Aida
  • La traviata  Done
    La traviata  Done
  • Requiem (not sure of the lithographer here; you'll need to check)
    Requiem (not sure of the lithographer here; you'll need to check)


Hope you're liking the results of your help, by the way! It should be a massive improvement to operas by the end of it. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yeah, they're looking great :D. I added Requiem above. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Think I'll do all the Les Troyens as a set. Treated this a bit differently to bring out the ink colour differences. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

La Prise de Troie
Les Troyens à Carthage


So, there's a name on the Aida cover (not the interior): C. We[i]denmüller, lit. [Not sure about that, but that's the only combination I tried that comes up as a surname. Should we move that one to en-wiki, as it's not quite old enough to be certain about the PD-70 status without more information on the lithographer? Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration goes well.

Right. Done. Also, I've uploaded a partially-finished restoration. Inclined to crop out the incidental 3D elements of the original to be safe by the end, by the way, but they're really minor, so I don't think they're much of an issue. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


You know, I don't feel so bad about asking you to get stuff for me if I'm rapidly working through what I asked you for. After all, it's not like the effort won't have dividends, right? Could I have:

and

? Think those are a nice collection of visually-interesting and important opera illustrations by other composers. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, no rush on the above. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll have to see what I can do. I've got a pile of Google Art Images requested on Commons too. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Have plenty to work on in the meantime, so it's not a rush at all. Whenever you have time. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, here's progress on La traviata. It's looking a lot better; still a little work needed. Like to upload after a while working on it; then you can use the "flick between images" trick to feel better about how much is left to do. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC) And it's done now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Liebesverbot
    Liebesverbot
  • Faust
    Faust
  • Ariadne auf Naxos  Done
    Ariadne auf Naxos  Done
  • Medea  Done
    Medea  Done
  • Etoile
    Etoile
  • Les Huguenots
    Les Huguenots
  • Alright, got 'em. Had trouble finding a couple of the lithographers, so most went local. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

L'éclair's coming along.... Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Chris, what's that plugin you use to download? Was restructuring Aida, and found gaps in the image coverage; http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b7000018k/f1.zoom.r=aida.langEN and http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8405736n/f1.zoom.r=aida and http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8436488g/f1.zoom.r=aida.langEN would fill a gap nicely, but I need to start getting the simple downloads myself. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • That workaround I emailed you before works, but only with the new viewer. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Having some trouble getting it to download properly. I can scale it, but it won't make the image. Maybe the page grabber is the problem? Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, L'éclair's done. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • What do you mean, "Make"? The image doesn't load properly, or you can't save? Make sure you're not going too big (max 6k*8k, I'd say). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hm. Maybe it's an XP thing? Or maybe I'm clicking the wrong button... Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's Ariadne auf Naxos done. That's half! Will wait a day or two for Rigoletto to start passing first. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking Das Liebersverbot next. Annoyed by the response to Ariadne... Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can't say I blame you. Good choice for the next image; Liebersverbot is one of my favorites. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ariadne passed in the end, though barely. So far, that means everything's passed. Not bad. Thinking of a short break to work on cleaning up Aida; there's a lot of good images in there that are somewhat poorly presented. And with all the work I did making it look good... Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The cover? That is looking great. No worries about breaks; we all need them. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The cover and a few other things. Think the following are all potentially featureable, with varying degrees of work.
  • Aida vocal score
    Aida vocal score
  • Verdi conducts Aida  Done
    Verdi conducts Aida  Done
  • Aida Act I, Scene 2
    Aida Act I, Scene 2
  • Aida Act II, Scene 2  Probably no work needed
    Aida Act II, Scene 2  Probably no work needed
  • Aida Act IV, Scene 2.  Done
    Aida Act IV, Scene 2.  Done
  • Modern performance of Aida  No work needed
    Modern performance of Aida  No work needed
Think File:Giuseppe Verdi, Aida vocal score title page.jpg might be the most problematic to get into articles. Will probably do it anyway, though, but it may not feature. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Completed:

One of yours, one of my catching up around the work I have set myself. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das Liebersverbot is going a little slow - the reconstruction is a little tricky - so I'm doing a new one to relax a little from it and Aida:
  • Original
    Original
  •  Done
     Done

Probably Aida after this, then Liebersverbot. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nice.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Y'know, I think knowing how to download these images might be a little dangerous. Expect the unexpected occasionally. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • In a country that recognizes the sweat of the brow doctrine, quite possibly. But I think the Coetzee case was a fluke, since he downloaded so many in such a short period of time. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
La favorite
I meant more me doing random things, instead of what I should be doing. Though I was somewhat good today. I used a different source file, though, as I found a higher-resolution, cleaner image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aye, that it is. It's addictive, though useful to the project. No worries about the source file; I noticed that when I checked out the article. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of this? I think I did a pretty good job, but I'm not sure if it needs more done. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a little erratic for a bit. Stressed out, so heavily favouring ones I can finish relatively quickly, because the hard ones can bog down after a bit. I'm still working on the harder ones, just whenever I get stressed about them, I do a couple easy ones to relax. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mockup of progress on Attila so far.
Noticed the Verdi image project was running a bit low on Verdi of late. I have two Aidas half-done, but I also have two Aida FPs in the sequence, so jumping to Attila a moment. Probably get Simon in as well, to get the Verdi percentage up a bit. As I was stressed out all week, I'm allowing myself a little randomness and free choice. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You have mail, by the way. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And that's the second set featured (presuming no-one changes votes in an hour or two). Third set ahoy! Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Slight break for soap. Could you suspend the nom? Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Think the front'll be done tomorrow. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord, that took forever. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And is also taking forever to get a quorum. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Right. Back to the opera grind! =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And another done. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Why aren't most of today's edits showing up under history? Sca (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Occasionally, the Wikipedia database lags. It usually resolves soon enough. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For some reason yesterday's edits by User Rainbow Unicorn haven't showed up in history today either. (Nor have mine.) Sca (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's just weird. Bug report it? Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
???? Sca (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Kiss (Munch)

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 04:56, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/AVI Records

Crisco, I was wondering whether you could take a look at this and decide whether you think it's okay for DYK, and if so, to give it a tick? I'm no longer in the right frame of mind to decide on the lede's characterization. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look and commenting. I was wondering whether you could also look at Template:Did you know nominations/Saint-Quentin-Fallavier attack. It has had some issues, and I did a partial copyedit, but later realized that while making the narrative clearer I'd also made it a bit stronger in terms of who the culprit is. I'm wondering whether the whole article suffers from this, which I guess would be a neutrality issue. Is this a problem throughout, only a minor issue that's easily fixed? And somewhat related, I thought there were grammatical issues throughout, which is why I copyedited a section as an example. Do you think the article still needs significant work? (Should George ask GOCE for help?) I appreciate this. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:32, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hudson's Soap advertisement
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Advertisement for Hudson's Soap with policemen (front). Wellcome L0069078 - Restoration.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Advertisement for Hudson's Soap with policemen (back). Wellcome L0069077 - Restoration.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Albert Reiss LOC ggbain-25651.jpg

Just to note, I did that restoration I promised. I just uploaded over. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Sock?

Sorry to message you, but just noticing a strange pattern on FP which might indicate something not-quite-genuine going on... I'm message you and Diliff as two of the more regular and knowledgeable editors on that page... I've noticed today there has been a lot of nominations by Alborzagros - in itself no MAJOR issue, even though most of them are (IMO) questionable... But under each one pretty much is a support from Rainbow Unicorn (with no reason given) and then a support from Jobas, again with no reason given... Again, no major issue with that, but notice the time stamps...

Just taking Jobas' time stamps they are as follows: Clevedon Pier - 11.22 10.08.15 Väike-Maarja church - 11.23 10.08.15 Taagepera Church - 11.24 10.08.15 3 cent US postage stamp ... - 11.24 10.08.15 Photograph of artist ... - 11.24 10.08.15 Irene Rice Pereira with ... - 11.25 10.08.15 Gillette Mach3 - 11.26 10.08.15 Sherman-Grant note - 11.27 10.08.15

Admitedly not all nominated by Alb, but still... I have the fastest internet connection Virgin Media will give me, but even I can't assess and edit 8 nominations in 5 minutes! Rainbow Unicorn has a similar pattern but I won't go into any further detail for now... Does this seem a little odd to you too? If nothing else, this seems to be someone supporting without actually looking at the pictures (I can't see any opposes from Jobas)... This surely should be a reason for getting all editors to give a verifiable reason when voting?

I appreciate not a lot can be done about this, but just wanted to see what your thoughts were... gazhiley 15:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Jobas has been running through FPC like that for several months now. I quite honestly can't figure out what the game is. Rainbow appears to be a new editor, at least based on the first edits. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • thanks for the reply... - glad I'm not the only one who has noticed this...gazhiley 14:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you zap this?

File:81f3bdb9fe6761ea00e5e5711f14b419.jpg There was nothing there except a redirect to File:Strange Cargo (1940 film).jpg-nothing linking to the numeric file page. Maybe we'd better round up a consensus because this is sooo controversial. :-) Thanks, We hope (talk) 23:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! We hope (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Annika Beck
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Annika Beck 2, 2015 Wimbledon Qualifying - Diliff.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?

I was wondering if it was not possible to make an exception for FU images in Sign? it is about the article, anyway. I mean it is illustrating the aricle, in a way. Hafspajen (talk) 13:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well. Hafspajen (talk) 14:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FA schedule

Hello Crisco,

Hope all is well. The Istanbul article you scheduled for the main page has a lot of problems and doesn't appear to be in a FA state. There's way too many bare link URLs, dates aren't formatted properly (see for example ref #40 and 45), dead links, [full citation needed] tags, and bibliography sources that don't point to any citation (i.e. Bloom 2009 and Düring 2010). Shouldn't these issues be a cause for concern? Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be in a FA state? Yikes, ok. @Crisco 1492: I still come onto Wikipedia. I can review the article sources (not at this hour though). There probably aren't too many things to change, though, because this article is quite stable, maybe 150 edits this year prior to John's copyediting. -- tariqabjotu 17:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Still a lot more than what the average article I write gets). If you can fix the referencing issues, we can run Istanbul for Republic Day in October.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, no problem. (And it seems like few edits for an unprotected article on a very large and important city.) -- tariqabjotu 02:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Marian Dawkins
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Professor Marian Dawkins CBE FRS headshot.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 00:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Can you help me move Elizabeth Keawepooole Sumner to Elizabeth Keawepoʻoʻole Sumner? Thanks!

Terjemah

Crisco, kamu bisa terjemahin kalimat ini nggak: The outbreak of World War II and the subsequent resource scarcity caused the British Raj to impose a limit on the use of filmstrip in 1943 to 11,000 feet,[58] a sharp reduction from the 20,000 feet that had been common till then. Erik Fastman (talk) 00:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Pecahnya Perang Dunia Kedua membuat sumber daya alam menjadi semakin langka, sehingga Kemaharajaan Inggris harus membatasi penggunaan filmstrip pada tahun 1943 menjadi 11.000 kaki (kurang-lebih 3000 m); sebelumnya, pembuat film diizinkan menggunakan 20.000 kaki (kurang-lebih 6000 m)." Mungkin bisa diperhalus lagi. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aviat Eagle II 2
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Christen Eagle II N49AE EDST.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 02:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Micrometer
A Featured picture candidate you edited has been promoted
An image you edited, featured picture status, File:Mahr Micromar 40A 0-25mm Micrometer.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New

I am just a monkey, no nothing about technicalities

Hey Chrizzz,

Added some of my new clicks, have a look, hope Haffy and Adam will also give their valuable comments.

DreamSparrow Chat 15:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • They're all useful, but 1) the cut-aways detract a lot from the full-resolution images and 2) the noise is a big minus. I frankly don't know how you got that much noise at ISO 320. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was actually with very dull light and coz of this heavy security system, we will not be able to find out a better position. Somehow managing and I know its effecting very badly but still, I thought, something is better than nothing. I hope I will only add better quality ones in future but not sure. I understand the creepy crop of Oommen Chandy but as you suggested before, making a close up one, I have done this. Will try a better one for this too. DreamSparrow Chat 16:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is of good quality but I don't feel to add this to the article, what you think ? DreamSparrow Chat 17:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The one you already put in the article probably has higher EV. The second one looks tense. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK overdue

Crisco, we're already a few hours overdue on a main page replacement; all that's available is a single prep. It looks a little long, but I checked how the main page would look, and the right side would still be longer than the left, so no worries there. If you can get to this in the next 40 minutes, we'll be in decent shape. Thanks for anything you can do. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the promotion. The bot, however, is complaining that File:Claudia Cardinale 1963.jpg isn't properly protected and won't proceed until it is; can you please take care of that? Sorry to have to bother you again, and thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • So it did. Why it didn't do so ten minutes earlier I don't pretend to understand. (I think this means I need to give the bot an extra ten minutes to see if it will take care of image issues.) As long as I have you here, do you think you'll be able to take on Template:Did you know nominations/Saint-Quentin-Fallavier attack that I mentioned the other day? If not, I'll try to find someone else. Thanks again for taking care of DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for looking. I think what I was most concerned about was BLP issues—whether the article was too strong in its depiction of the alleged culprit—but it's not an area I'm well enough versed in. If you didn't see any problems, then I'm not going to worry about it. There are a couple more old ones that I have in my eye, but I think one at least will be solved tomorrow; if not, I may ask you to give a second opinion. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peleuli

Can you merge the history of User:KAVEBEAR/Peleuli and Peleuli?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Madonna (Edvard Munch)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Edvard Munch - Madonna - Google Art Project.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 03:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Edvard Munch - Madonna - Google Art Project (495100).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 03:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slight Change

Chriss.....

I have made some slight changes to this, what do you think about this ? I have a plan to nominate this, please do if there are any corrections. I hope nobody will object this based on EV, may be some of them will demand for the photograph with Ministerial actions, he he he DreamSparrow Chat 18:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Big Ask

Hi Crisco. About 19 months ago I was working on a page where I had a conflict of interest and I couldn't bring the page up to GA myself, because I was abstaining from a section that included content about competitors. You were gracious enough to do that one section yourself.

There's a similar issue on Invisalign, where most of the article is GAN-ready, but @Doc James: has expressed concern about COI influences in regards to incorporating the content of three MEDRS sources,[1][2][3] such as I attempted to do here.

Medical claims have always been a sensitive area of Wikipedia (though perhaps less so for dental claims) and some areas are more sensitive to COI than others. It doesn't seem productive for me to attempt to author with with a COI. I know it's a big ask, but I thought if you had some time to spend doing this last leg of the article, it would be a huge help to all parties involved. CorporateM (Talk) 22:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Kuncio, DA (March 2014). "Invisalign: current guidelines for effective treatment". The New York state dental journal. 80 (2): 11–4. PMID 24851387.
  2. ^ Y, Yu; Al., Et (November 9, 2012). "Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment. - PubMed". NCBI. Retrieved August 10, 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  3. ^ Malik, Ovals; McMullin, Allbhe; Waring, David (April 2013). "Invisible Orthodontics Part 1: Invisalign". Dental Update. PMID 23767109.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crisco_1492&oldid=prev&diff=676135380

Leave a Reply