I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scooby Doo characters. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're spending a lot of effort on an draft that will never get published, because it already exists. I'd recommend you concentrate your efforts elsewhere. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:25, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Victor Schmidt. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of minor DC Comics characters without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conner Kent69! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eve Teschmacher (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eve Teschmacher (character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 15:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Black Siren (arrowverse), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Black Siren (arrowverse) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Black Siren (arrowverse) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more sources to indicate independent notability from Lex Luthor's page or List of Superman supporting characters. Do not use Wikipedia as a citation. (already removed two of them so far)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eve Teschmacher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eve Teschmacher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Draft:Flying Graysons (comics). Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please have a look at the following guide:

• Wikipedia:How to delete a page

If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you used the Wikia page Meta-humans as a source, this source fails the general guidelines because it is a user-generated website (like Wikipedia is), you could use the sources mentioned on Wikia if they're not primary sources themselves (as in written by Warner Brothers) but by websites covering the series in the Flash-Arrowverse as a general media website. --Donald Trung (talk) 20:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would say you could use Heroic Hollywood and only to a lesser extend Batman-News because the latter is more invest in media related to DC Comics and thus less neutral. --Donald Trung (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dick Grayson, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank a page, as you did with this edit to Draft:Black Star (character). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black Star (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources. Not about one subject, but really a disambiguation list for four characters (all questionable).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of this article is WP:TRIVIA and does not belong in an encyclopedia. If you remember back to December, I requested that you discuss these huge additions before adding them to the article, much less creating a new article. You're also spamming links to List of minor Scooby-Doo characters on pretty much any page you can think of, which comes across as very disruptive. I understand that you may feel these are notable, but when an editor expresses a legitimate concern with your edits, you need to discuss and at least try to come to a consensus. There are also numerous significant typos in your article. I understand that English isn't your first language, but if you feel you are having trouble, you should ask for help. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and ignoring everyone who disagrees with you and doing whatever you want isn't a style of editing that's going to work here. Please either create a discussion or revert your edits, or I will be reporting you to WP:ANI. Regards, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 18:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]