Hello Supersonic-bionic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Grandmasterka Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

The way I know is that for major releases, Ireland and the UK always have the same releases. A lot of the distributors are merged for them anyway - as far as I know Sony BMG's division for the two is Sony BMG UK & Ireland - only a few bother to seperate the two e.g. UMG. It's more than an assumption - it's common knowledge. Nearly all UK or Irish channels are available in both, while the MTV channels are intended for both (see MTV UK and Ireland). And I'm not exactly sure what you mean by my userpage. Do you mean the userboxes? - ^Рэд_хот 19:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I just noticed that Sony BMG have actually split Sony BMG UK & Ireland into SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (UK) LIMITED and SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (IRELAND) LIMITED (must have been quite recently) but the point still stands. - ^Рэд_хот 19:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just realised now, they haven't really - just on paper. If you go to sonybmg.ie the only useful link relating to Sony BMG is one to sonybmgmusic.co.uk. - ^Рэд_хот 19:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see. That makes it marginally less likely, but still overwhelmingly likely. It's like, if it was gonna be Sony BMG it was like 99% likely, now its just 97%. - ^Рэд_хот 19:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(I keep forgetting bits!) The userboxes are pretty easy, just see WP:UB. - ^Рэд_хот 19:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(I forgot ANOTHER bit) Looking at AATW's artists it goes back up to 99% likely as Cascada, Dannii Minogue, and Frankee have all had popular releases in Ireland. I did some searching on iTunes Ireland and all the other artists I checked were available for purchase too. - ^Рэд_хот 19:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I've now fully investigated AATW's artists. All the ones that are released, are on iTunes Ireland with AATW listed as the copyright holder. - ^Рэд_хот 19:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're releases are on iTunes Ireland which is one of the few places where the Irish and UK catalogues are seperate. This is the OFFICIAL Irish Singles Chart as of now (look at #1 and #5) [1] - ^Рэд_хот 19:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But notice it doesn't mention Ireland at all. Small-ish labels based in the UK usually don't. It's a bit messy cause Ireland has different release dates. It doesn't mention Cascada or Mick Modell VS Jessy in Ireland either but they're on the chart. It's probably to do with who distributes their CDs for them (it's probably not themselves since they're probably too small to make it economically feasable) - ^Рэд_хот 19:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know what kind of proof you want. I've shown you they've had popular releases in Ireland, and they don't mention Irish releases for them on their site, so in the very likely event that Mambo! will be released in Ireland, it won't be any different. - ^Рэд_хот 19:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Now I'm very confused. I've provided you with proof that AATW do have releases in Ireland, despite not saying it on their site. Yet you still seem to doubt it. I live in Ireland and know a great deal about Irish releases, and their relationship to UK ones, and can very close to guarantee you that it will be out in Ireland. But for the sake of absolute cetainty, I've e-mailed AATW to be completely, 100%, no-doubt, positively certain. - ^Рэд_хот 20:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Take a look at iTunes Ireland if you want. - ^Рэд_хот^{(t • c • e)} 15:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

First of all, I wanna say that it's quite my opinion, but TRL Italy had to remove the video from the playlist, because they couldn't sent the video! Neither France, Spain, the UK ore the rest of Europe are sending the video on music channels and the only Sony BMG to talk about this new single was the German one. On the British official site of Christina Aguilera there are no info about Oh Mother, while on the German it has been posted since a long time news about Oh Mother. That's why I think that Oh Mother was and will only be released in German-speaking-countries. Of course it could be that the other European countries will release this single in future, but I don't think so. Olliyeah (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's happening quite often that a musician is releasing a song only in those countries, for example Nelly Furtado. Hmmm, there isn't such a mess. I saw bigger problems. =) By the way, I changed the things I know they aren't right. Olliyeah (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, of course her Live-DVD will be released in all European countries!! =) Have you deleted the info about the Singapore chart..?!Olliyeah (talk) 21:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no no..it wasn't me! but why did you delete it..?! it's true and it has been confirmed.. and another question.. did you write that the video of Oh Mother is airing in the UK..?! it's just a question- I have no idea XD Olliyeah (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmm...the source for the sales in Singapore is in the reception part.. Olliyeah (talk) 17:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think we already knew each other...hehe Well, Croatia doesn't have an own charts site and this blog shows the sales of the Croatian music business, which are made by Billboard. Those grafics are made by Billboard and were copied from their site. I'm sorry, but I wasn't the one, who deleted the Airplay charts!! But usually you delete the Airplay sites, when an official single chart is there! I know it's annoying,but wikipedia wants it so. Olliyeah (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you edit the Burlesque sales in Christina Aguilera discography? The sales are over 455,000 copies. Source. Terneris (talk) 15:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.221.176.175 (talk) [reply]

If you want to undo several edits as you did on My Number One, then go to the history, click on the date of the version you want, then when that old page opens up, click edit and then save. It will override all edits since that version and return the page to that version. Grk1011 (talk) 03:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 09:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get you one and message you back, the current sales in the UK are around 505,000+ although it is only certified Platinum as it hasnt surpassed 600,000. Wneedham02 (talk) 21:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Heres Back to Basics' worldwide sales:

Back To Basics (2006)

• USA : 1.900.000
• Canada : 175.000
• Brésil : 20.000

• Australie : 170.000
• Nouvelle-Zélande : 25.000

• Japon : 110.000

• Europe : 1.430.000
  • UK : 500.000
  • France : 130.000
  • Allemagne : 220.000
  • Espagne : 30.000
  • Italie : 105.000
  • Pays-Bas : 60.000
  • Suède : 50.000
  • Autriche : 30.000
  • Suisse : 55.000
  • Finlande : 10.000

• Estimations mondiales : 4.300.000

Wneedham02 (talk) 18:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theyre correct, the guy who does them has worked out Christina's sales for years and Back to Basics hasnt sold over 300k in Canada its only just certified 3xPlats over there platinum being 80,000 at most 240,000 copies sold... These sales are based from 2008 the last UK sales were 505,000 = Platinum!... The link I have is blocked but check UKMix and you'll see Wneedham02 (talk) 16:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theres more than just him theres a few and they work them out really well, Ive asked them for a source of the UK B2B sales when they get one ill send it, but all there seems to be are shipment sales!Wneedham02 (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. If you can spare a few minutes your opinion would be appreciated at: Wikiproject/Discographies#Do music videos and other charted songs belong. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Greece Newsletter Issue XII (VIII) – March 2011

Project news This is the eighth newsletter of the WikiProject Greece, and the first after a two-year-long hiatus! Please comment on its form, the way it is delivered, its content etc. We need your ideas and contributions! Recognized content: as of publication, our project stands at 47 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 11 A-class articles and 102 Good Articles, making up 1% of its ca. 15,000 tagged articles and lists. Ongoing drives and discussions – You can help! Due to the restructuring of the administrative divisions of Greece as a result of the Kallikratis reform, a large number of administrative units and settlements need to be updated. Please refer to the discussions at the project talk page and the overview table for more information. Project members are requested to aid in checking the huge backlog of articles created by Pumpie (talk · contribs) for mistranslations and original research. This affects over 2,000 Greece-related articles and lists, and your help is vital! A new portal on Greek Macedonia has been set up: Portal:Macedonia (Greece). Please contribute by adding content and improving it and the other portals related to our WikiProject! Additional input is always needed in the ongoing deletion discussions about Greece-related articles. You can help with assessing unassessed articles for quality and importance (Guidelines).

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece/Outreach#Delivery options.

You didn't say what you were trying to do with an edit summary, and the positions were not supported by the source provided. status ϟ ^talk 21:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Remember to do both of the above next time, so your edits don't get reverted. status ϟ ^talk 21:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm a new editor, I've been editing "Christina Aguilera Discography" article lately, can you help me with some details please?

Hello, Supersonic-bionic. You have new messages at Template talk:Certification Table Entry.
Message added 11:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Muhandes (talk) 11:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... so nice to meet you. — 78.127.30.84 (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard is a trade magazine, The Scotsman has no ties to the music industry, and it can be argued that there's a conflict of interest (Metacritic's profile of Billboard). The ratings template is for ratings, and "favorable" is not a rating, so a score would be preferred. As far as circulation, Billboard (at least the latest I could google) was around 18,000, less than the figure cited in the Wikpedia article for the Scotsman. Also, the ratio shown at Metacritic or AnyDecentMusic valides using 2 positive to 8 mixed scores in the ratings template for this album. Dan56 (talk) 20:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only kind of consistency in articles that Wikipedia promotes is style and formatting, but even that shouldnt be "though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia as a whole." (WP:MOS) As far as what review to choose, each article has its own information available to it and how to distribute it into an article. I can imagine Billboard or some other "favorable" entry in the template for an article on an album that didnt receive many reviews, but if there are enough scores available to show an accurate representation of most reviews, the template doesnt need scoreless ones. BTW, the critical reception section of the Red article you mentioned is pretty shoddy; overlong quotes, poor paraphrasing, redundant mentions of ratings when the ratings are already mentioned in the template, etc. Dan56 (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I did replace the NYtimes entry, but it was removed by another editor. Dan56 (talk) 16:05, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedias arent about "variety". They are reference works, and they reference "the most reliable sources on a topic" and should only reflect those. If the majority of professional music critics gave the album a score that is reflected by sources like Metacritic or AnyDecentMusic?, then that is what should be reflected here. WP:ALBUMS articles and their critical reception sections arent supposed to spice things up by performing a balancing act and seeking positive reviews to offset the mixed or negative reviews, because that would be breaching the integrity and informal tone of an encyclopedia. This album got what it got, and that is what is being reflected. Please be "neutral in form": "Creating an article or section about a phenomenon's reception is not meant to be an complete list of all praise and criticism, but to provide readers with a representative sample of how that phenomenon has been received." Furthermore, "It is not the responsibility of any one editor to research all points of view." BTW, I dont see how the citation for Q lacking a url would be a problem; they're a print publication used by both Metacritic and AnyDecentMusic?, specifically these aggregate sites' entries for Lotus. Dan56 (talk) 19:37, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we should discuss each single's inclusion on the talk page of the discography. It's the most sensible way to solve this matter. We can talk about it here on your talk page here if you wish. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 21:46, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think we should add the Bionic WW sales that are in the B2B ww sales reference? --Watquaza (talk) 23:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add a "Legacy" section on Christina's page? --Watquaza (talk) 03:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For example, her influence on some artists like Jordin Sparks, Danity Kane and Adam Lambert. Plus her impact on the LGBT community. --Watquaza (talk) 04:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's leave the sales first, and then the certifications. It looks better like this! --Watquaza (talk) 05:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, give your opinion in this discussion. --Watquaza (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, mistaken link :S [2] --Watquaza (talk) 01:30, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, did you saw this? [3] --Watquaza (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, mistaken link. Here's the one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Christina_Aguilera --Watquaza (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chronisgr, I still believe you should be part of this wikiproject [4] --Watquaza (talk) 20:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing you've been doing all this time, contributing on Aguilera's articles. There are also some pending tasks in the project. --Watquaza (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your endless contributions on the Xtina's articles :) Watquaza (talk) 05:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Croatian chart is an official album chart, so I see no reason as to why you've deleted it. To say 1 chart per country is enough is silly, even for a small country. If the album has charted in more than 1 chart in a country, then I see no reason as to why it shouldn't be included, especially since other countries such as Belgium, South Korea and Taiwan have more than 1 album chart. So, i've included the album chart back in the Wiki page. Thanks, --StephenN17 (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that "Beautiful" (with Beverly McClellan) and "The Prayer" (with Chris Mann (singer)) are 2 official singles by Christina Aguilera ? Trnhgduoc2222 (talk) 01:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted the change you made at Congratulations: 50 Years of the Eurovision Song Contest, in which you changed the name of the Macedonia to "FYR Macedonia".

You may not be aware that you hit a hot-button issue here — something which has been dealt with in the past by our Arbitration Committee. See WP:NCMAC, which describes the accepted naming conventions for referring to the Republic of Macedonia in Wikipedia articles. Briefly, we are to call this country "Macedonia" — or, if the context requires the full official name, the "Republic of Macedonia". Qualifiers may sometimes be used, but only if absolutely necessary in a specific situation. The specific term "former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia" may be used very sparingly, and only "in contexts where the Yugoslavian past of the area or the political events surrounding the breakup of Yugoslavia are the most salient anchor point for disambiguation". The abbreviation "FYROM" should never be used.

You may not agree with WP:NCMAC, but you must follow what it says if you intend to keep working on Wikipedia. Repeated or flagrant violations are likely to result in a block, meaning you would not be able to continue editing Wikipedia at all.

In order to make absolutely sure no one can question whether you have been properly warned about this matter, I am including a standard scripted warning below. Again, this issue is taken very, very seriously here, and edit-warring on the subject will definitely not be tolerated.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Wesley♦Mouse 16:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]