This is a Wikipedia user talk page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chacor.

I wouldn't call it a dispute, but I will try there first. Thanks for reminding me of it. Dev920 (check out this proposal) 11:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you still want an RFA, I would be happy to nominate you. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks!

— Saxifrage

My error. I thought all NASA things were fine-my dumb error. I just put it up for Speedy deletion.Mitchazenia 14:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed-its gone.Mitchazenia 17:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. I thought there was something funny going on when i saw Tony Blair tagged as {{hoax}}... --Guinnog 14:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I'm an acquaintance of Ed who has gone on a long Wikibreak and I fear he may not come back. In User:Ed/Statement he left your name in a list of debates he had. As a fellow Esperanzian of his, I'm concerned. If it's not too forward, could you please let me know what's happened between you and he, and also anything about this user. Thank you. DoomsDay349 18:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh... wow. I never even saw this side of Ed. I pretty much get it; he was aggravated at administrators exerting "unfair" (in his eyes) power, over him, mostly. If you promise to keep this between us, I think he's dead wrong. I see this stuff all the time; "Oh, the big nasty administrator is not being nice!" etc., etc., just because they didn't get their way. Yeah, it might be mean, but that's how I see it. Whatever. He was a fairly nice guy, to me at least, but if he plans on trolling like this I think we might be better without him...at least until he cools down. DoomsDay349 00:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chacor, just wanted to thank you for reverting User:FairNBalanced's unfounded edits on my user page. Much appreciated. :-) (→Netscott) 02:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, you beat me to it BadCop 07:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC) (Ryulong)[reply]

Hello, please confirm yourself for the meetup on the 24th by November 18. If you have any ideas or suggestions, please list them at the meetup page yourself. Thanks. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 04:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, calm down, so now driving mew crazy at this. Cyclone1 gets to keep his own but you never let me do mine. And what's that resaon for? — Alastor Moody _{(T + C + U)} 06:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're real trying to hurt my back, aren't ya? — Alastor Moody _{(T + C + U)} 08:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! I'll do that. i'll tell Alastor Moody, too. →Cyclone1→ 14:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you already did. Ok. →Cyclone1→ 14:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Though what you did is not so random, I, on behalf of E@L, award you this barnstar for your support. Randfan 18:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some created a RFAr against you and didn't bother informing you of it. So I guess I am officially notifying you of it. semper fi — Moe 04:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. The user and the case was reverted. :) semper fi — Moe 04:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is Konstable. According to your blatant personal attacks, I am a troll who should not be fed, yet you and others have invited me into an arbitration in which I will not take part. Hrm... So which one is it? Or was it your desire in the first place to have a one sided arbitration? And as to other admins that got de-sysoped for less that you were referring to, could it have been someone, say you, getting de-sysoped for being confirmed by checkuser to be following the will of the very banned user Daniel Brandt? Now you see, I am bringing this up because I remember you running for RfA and saying that it was a silly non-issue. Yet you think that I am an ultimate troll for lifing a mistaken block?--203.109.209.49 11:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Don't reply to the IP talk page, this IP is shared and is not really static - changes every now and then.[reply]

You said SIX DAYS AGO you were leaving. Your continued insistence on posting message like this very one using IP addresses is highly disruptive. If you want to go, just go, but don't disrupt how we work. Just leave, and no-one will bother you. – Chacor 11:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you see, I didn't think it was disruptive to ask people questions. I did leave, I came back for a quick message to Ryulong for which I was blocked as you very well know. And now people are making personal attacks against me. How am I disrupting the way things work here? What did I disrupt? Asking you questions? Posting goodbye messages to people? I will not be using User:Konstable again, and as people have a problem with me using socks I am using my IP, or would you rather I create User:AlternativeAccountK_2? In fact you personally posted a statement on the arbitration inviting me to comment and now I am a troll for doing so?--203.109.209.49 11:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? As far as I can see, I never made any insinuation that you should comment at the RFAR. Seriously, just ignore all of this and leave. This is wasting everyone's time, including your own. For the sake of everybody, stop posting, and we'll leave you alone. I'm willing to retract my RFAR comment if you leave. Just stop treating us like idiots, because it'll only stir up more anger and controversy. – Chacor 11:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]