Content deleted Content added
Carolmooredc (talk | contribs) →Bias categories: celebrating now with wikilove |
→Bias categories: wooo barnstar |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::I would suggest not pushing the issue aggressively. Make some edits to [[Wikipedia:Categorization]] and give the change a little time to sink in. Maybe you could add a "Bias categories" section after the "Eponymous categories" section of the guideline. Of course, that's just my opinion so feel free to ignore it. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 02:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
::I would suggest not pushing the issue aggressively. Make some edits to [[Wikipedia:Categorization]] and give the change a little time to sink in. Maybe you could add a "Bias categories" section after the "Eponymous categories" section of the guideline. Of course, that's just my opinion so feel free to ignore it. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 02:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::I was thinking that after I finished being assertive ;-) in a couple places. So instead celebrating tonight giving out Wikilove using your script :-) [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc#top|talk]]) 02:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
:::I was thinking that after I finished being assertive ;-) in a couple places. So instead celebrating tonight giving out Wikilove using your script :-) [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc#top|talk]]) 02:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Thanks for the barnstar! I was wondering if that discussion would ever be closed... [[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] ⋅ [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 02:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:52, 8 March 2011
Please post comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk Page of that Article if it is relevant to all editors.
Green Line
|
|---|
Bias categories
Congratulations on the hard fought victory. Glad to see that there will be some consistency now and hopefully this will alleviate some BLP problems. Kaldari (talk) 02:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- We'll see if the most recalcitrant category tries to stage a counter-revolution :-) CarolMooreDC (talk) 02:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest not pushing the issue aggressively. Make some edits to Wikipedia:Categorization and give the change a little time to sink in. Maybe you could add a "Bias categories" section after the "Eponymous categories" section of the guideline. Of course, that's just my opinion so feel free to ignore it. Kaldari (talk) 02:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- I was thinking that after I finished being assertive ;-) in a couple places. So instead celebrating tonight giving out Wikilove using your script :-) CarolMooreDC (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest not pushing the issue aggressively. Make some edits to Wikipedia:Categorization and give the change a little time to sink in. Maybe you could add a "Bias categories" section after the "Eponymous categories" section of the guideline. Of course, that's just my opinion so feel free to ignore it. Kaldari (talk) 02:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! I was wondering if that discussion would ever be closed... Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)