Cannabis Ruderalis

Welcome!

Hello, Bymatth2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ralph Biasi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mr. Guye (talk) 01:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ralph Biasi

The article Ralph Biasi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

#Unsourced WP:BLP
  1. Hoax. Only mayor of Americana, Sao Paulo is Diego de Nadai.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ralph Biasi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ralph Biasi, Bymatth2!

Wikipedia editor Mr. Guye just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Stop icon

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Mr. Guye's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Ralph Biasi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ralph Biasi, Bymatth2!

Wikipedia editor Mr. Guye just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Write a helpful note for Bymatth2. It will be posted on their talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Mr. Guye's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Ralph Biasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Biasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Biasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Colonne Fabien

Hello Bymatth2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Colonne Fabien for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. - Phill24th (talk). 16:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Phill24th: Again, check in google books before you try to nominate a meagre stub!!! It's shoddy encyclopedia reviewing to speedy subjects because they're not well developed or well formatted.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Payne Jackson

Hello Bymatth2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Payne Jackson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. - Phill24th (talk). 16:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Phill24th: No kidding, it is you who ought to be speedy deleted from wikipedia. Newbies don't stand a chance here with reviewers like you. Please do a google search before trying to delete new content, however bad. OK? You ought to be embarrassed at trying to delete John Payne Jackson, which is now clearly a very good new article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply