I would say that there is vandalism in Macedonia (region) by 62.162.188.110 and user: Andrej Machkovski (sock puppets?). Even though it might be interpreted that they 'edit' in favour of 'ethnic Macedonian' irredentism, I would say they are harming your (?) cause and the article. Politis 15:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on Petar Poparsov, you know the drill.   /FunkyFly.talk_  22:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's a debate about how much "X-ian" one must be in order to be considered "X-American" (or X-Yian for that matter) and be categorized as such. The poll is here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Rules for lists of X-Americans. Kindly weigh in! :NikoSilver: 21:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That word's funny ;-) --Tēlex 14:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is so funny about it? De Fyroming is that ancient family that invented everything there is to know about anything that exists :-). Politis 14:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Bomac 14:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a non-Macedonian/non-Greek, posting that article was a real introduction to the intensity over the M-word!!!!

AWN:)

AWN2 14:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)AWN2AWN2 14:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I'm getting the feeling I have headaches from my own country's name ;-) Bomac 14:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :)

I have tried to clarify someone's post of the term "Vardar Macedonia" on my "Jews in the Republic of Macedonia" article. I am not sure if the term is a loaded Greek or Macedonian term -- take a look at the article if ou get a chance and let me know what you think. I have also messaged Telex to get his thoughts...

Cheers :) AWN2 16:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)AWN2AWN2 16:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that'll be the first article we're not bitching too much about! :-) :NikoSilver: 22:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sta se uci/govori u Makedoniji kada su Srbi u pitanju. Oni koji znaju o tom najvise su Makedonci i srpski istoricari za Makedoniju (mada ovi drugi uglavnom ukljucuju Srpsku Radikalnu Stranku i druge krugove koji ne priznaju makedonsku naciju; i samo ce mi prikazati velikosrpski makedonski POV, pa otpadaju). Ovde ima mnogo (citaj mnogo) naturalized Makedonaca - ali se oni ponasaju kao obicni Srbijanci - niti znaju ista o Makedoniji, ni njihovom poreklu.

Did you have no trouble understanding this, or should I translate to Cyrillic or English? Bye and glad to hear from you! --HRE 17:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Radikali pokusavaju da podignu srpsku manjinu u Makedoniji, i kako kazu, "srpske Makedonce", tj. Makedonce za koje kazu da su etnicki Srbi, a samo Makedonci po nacionalnosti. Dok (hvala Bogu) stranka najzad napusta svoje stavove o tome da su Makedonci u stvari Srbi, i tvrde da ukupno ima preko 200,000 "srpskih Makedonaca". Dok mislim da je to izuzetno previse preterano, oni smatraju tu o Makedoncima koji tvrde da su Makedonci i nista vise - ali priznaju Srpsku Pravoslavnu Crkvu (a koliko sam cuo, ima takvih). Jesi li cuo da su uspeli stvoriti Partiju Srpskoga naroda u Makedoniji (koja ustvari nema podrske kod Srba u Makedoniji)? --HRE 18:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nego ono sto mene zanima je (bas) srednjovekovna istorija. Ako ne znas sam licno o njoj detaljno, mozes mi i dati neki link (iako donekle, umem ja citati makedonski jezik). --HRE 18:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have anything to do with http://www.bomac.co.nz/? --Kiro Gligorov 11:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK - how about just saying he was Macedonian? --Kiro Gligorov 11:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you do have a point. However, he was a member of BMARC. It's not false date, it's incomplete data. At least it does not say he's not an ethnic Macedonian. --Kiro Gligorov 11:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you keep an eye for a time on Albanians in the Republic of Macedonia? A fanatic newbie, Objectivee, insists in restoring his utterly unsourced and biased edits, and menaces going on until he will have it his way. Bye, --Aldux 16:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, could you fill out and check the pronouns section? - FrancisTyers · 17:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talking of bad english... This phrase does seem to make sense. Am i not entitle to change it? Seems not.

(In any case between you and me there is no seperate history and if you beleive so please make some reffereces to you sources).

The lack of refferences is quite evident in the whole of the text. I do not see why i should provide bibliography for altering (in good faith) passages that state important but in a way unaccurate facts and do not have any reffences to back them up. In any case, i will do so if anyone asks me for it but i wont lose my time when it seems that certain people are quite satisfied with their wotk and do not accept comments and corrections.(but if this is the case they should not write here, really)

As for the ancient period paragraph. It is quite misleading since it does not refer to ancient times at all. Propably should exclude all the passage from text. It is indeed a controversial article and a very amusing one to follow up, from its creation to the seemingly result. Is like drafting a treaty between hostal tribes. The fact that large parts of the outcome derive from original contributions with very clear, highly nationalistic positions for the one (mostly) and the other side is absolutely charming.

Considering all that, i think that i propably could lower my expectations but of course not abandon them. This article has flaws and can be improved. The fact that is controversial should not be considered a problem. There is no thing like status quo ante in wiki as far as i know. In any case my alterations reffer to comonly accepted facts undisputed by all sides. I will sincerely continue keeping you company in your efforts. Thanks in advance Haas

ps: i am not a freak nationalist. The choice of words should be more carefull. You are lowering the level here Bomac (and may i add: an impresseive page, wow! I wonder if you can tell the same thing for yourself...)

No, no puppet. I was puzzled seeing the "freak comment", do not really deserve it i think. I could not see to who other than me you reffered to, at the time. So much ado about nothing... See you around Haas

Regarding the identification of "ethnic Macedonians" as 'Slavs', what do you make of it? Do you know what the different opinions are in ROM/FYROM? To be honest with you I do not know what to think. The Slavomacedonian Greek Pavlos Koufis, a (deceased?) local historian, is happy with Slavomakedones (see Aegean Macedonia) and I respect his work and the love for his region in norhern Greece. As you realise, it is just about impossible for Greeks to say 'Madedonas' and not to identify the word with the Greeks of Makedonia. Of course, the same applies north of the border. I wish there was something acceptable that Greeks could call 'ethnic Macedonians' in ROM/FYROM. Believe me, the term 'Skopianoi' is not at all offensive, people fall in love and marry 'Skopians', they go shopping and gambling in Skopia (what you would call Macedonia). Politis 13:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, what do you think about this Serbian POV on Macedonia? this thing. --HolyRomanEmperor 12:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, B. It's nice to see you're back from your wikibreak. --Telex 22:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Template:Geographical Macedonia, kindly read my edit-summary. •NikoSilver• 23:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, was this anon. edit accurate?--Tekleni 14:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now, what was that, "there are reliable sources"? I'm not removing anything, it's User:Vbb-sk-mk who removes a perfectly valid flag which is obviously in the public domain by claiming it's "unlicenced". And that's because he simply doesn't like it. Please don't blindly support such Macedonian nationalist behaviour, but review other users' edits before reverting. We're all trying to be neutral here, so having the two flags is the best we can get. Regards, Todor→Bozhinov 15:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Здраво Bomac, вака јас ја поставив статијата за Адам, и ја категоризирав како Македонски Артефакти, што беше избришано. Гледам дека сега како скулптури си ја ставил. Јас би препорачал сепак тоа да се Артефакти, бидејќи друго значење би имало скулптура. Поздрав Leks81 08:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please kindly reconsider