It inspired me to "buy" the album. So far, so good, thanks! As a critter from the Forests of Legend myself, I look forward to hearing their take on the place (and then reading the lyrics, because this singer sounds sick, in both ways). InedibleHulk (talk) 03:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

had no idea a random wiki username would spur someone to find the album, cool! BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 18:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can you please read what Tags are for, as you keep on misusing them. Slatersteven (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what this is in reference to, pal. BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 16:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You keep on adding tags asking for something to be attributed, we do attribute, read wp:cir. Slatersteven (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of adding inappropriate tags, try starting up a talk page thread asking who he is. Slatersteven (talk) 17:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The tags are correct enough, but your attitude is appearing to be in bad faith based on these comments now. BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 18:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No they are not, we do attribute it, both the writer and where he wrote it, that is what we mean by attribution we say who said it, we do so using his name. Slatersteven (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also read wp:npa and wp:tenditious. Slatersteven (talk) 18:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coming on to my talk page to question my competency is very much a personal attack on your part. Pointing it out is not. Thanks for coming out. BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 18:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK fine, I have tried to explain to you what you are doing wrong. Now its a warning. Next time you misuse a tag I will report you. Slatersteven (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you haven't 'explained to me what I'm doing is wrong,' you've attacked me and refused to explain anything. If you want to report me, go right ahead, I'm not the one being uncivil here. BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 18:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]